Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar Boeing 787 refurb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2023, 04:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Round the corner
Age: 61
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Smile

Its good news for the crews on the Jq 787 fleet. After their treatment during covid from all quarters, its a welcome change.

As far as other individuals negativity, I think you will find that most simply dont care what you think.

MCD

ManillaChillaDilla is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2023, 05:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 151
Received 119 Likes on 35 Posts
Some of these comments are amazing.

Looks like extra frames are on the horizon as well.
LostontheLOC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 12th Nov 2023, 06:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,185
Received 213 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by Potsie Weber
Yes, paid in full to Dixon. $4.1m bonus when he ordered them in 2005.
Where specifically is this "$4.1m bonus" referenced?
MickG0105 is online now  
Old 12th Nov 2023, 18:07
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 252
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by LostontheLOC
Some of these comments are amazing.

Looks like extra frames are on the horizon as well.
There ain’t no more frames coming. Not in the Boeing variety at least.
GA Driver is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2023, 18:18
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 151
Received 119 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by GA Driver
There ain’t no more frames coming. Not in the Boeing variety at least.
We will see how this comment ages.
LostontheLOC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 12th Nov 2023, 19:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
When someone told you more frames coming, did you ask them what nations flag was on the tail?

D checks will require considerable downtime for many years. Someone else will need to fill the gap, it sure won’t be locals. Won’t want those Asian LCCs taking market share.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2023, 21:09
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Suitcase
Posts: 80
Received 20 Likes on 10 Posts
Wouldn’t be surprised if some mainline 78’s were borrowed during the downtime due D-checks. Just like how the A330s were borrowed some time ago. Didn’t mainline just increased their orders of 78’s?
Hollywood1 is online now  
Old 12th Nov 2023, 21:14
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Posts: 2,471
Received 318 Likes on 118 Posts
Originally Posted by Hollywood1
Wouldn’t be surprised if some mainline 78’s were borrowed during the downtime due D-checks. Just like how the A330s were borrowed some time ago. Didn’t mainline just increased their orders of 78’s?
Given the fact that mainline is short of airframes and it’s restricting wanted growth, I highly doubt they are going to hand over a couple of 787’s to Jetstar for a few years.
morno is online now  
Old 13th Nov 2023, 02:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 151
Received 119 Likes on 35 Posts
It's clear that's there's not enough of them, so either get rid of them or at least double the fleet! With the 100mil investment it's looking positive.
LostontheLOC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 13th Nov 2023, 07:11
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,339
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Hollywood1
....Just like how the A330s were borrowed some time ago....
Think you'll find that "borrowed" is selective memory.
The A330/B787 Qantas/Jetstar shuffle was a result of the inability to get the 787 to JQ on time (read QF stuffing up the order). JQ needed a widebody. Once they had enough, the A330's could come back to QF so they could retire the 767.
JQ had the 787 for 4 years before QF got one. Joyce wouldn't commit whether JQ will get the 321XLR first. Doesn't say much for mainline when all the flash new "game changers" go to JQ first.

Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2023, 19:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Round the corner
Age: 61
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Talking

Traffic is correct.

The constant chorus of " well informed " detractors have been proved wrong. The 787s are staying at JQ.
The narrative that they were always going back to QF has once and for all been proved to be incorrect as it always was going to be.
Its great news for the 787 crews. End of story.

MCD
ManillaChillaDilla is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2023, 23:59
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by ManillaChillaDilla

The constant chorus of " well informed " detractors have been proved wrong. The 787s are staying at JQ.

MCD
You’re spinning it the wrong way.

What was on the whiteboard in Collingwood in 2019? That’s right, 3 to be sold and a further 2 EOI to the buyer should they want more. The fleet was heading out the door.

2022 onwards the dynamics changed.

Margins soared. That part of group is making green earnings for the first time ever. The decision has now changed to hold them. Great for everyone, but don’t act like the past was unicorns and rainbows.
PoppaJo is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by PoppaJo:
Old 14th Nov 2023, 01:16
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
What was on the whiteboard in Collingwood in 2019? That’s right, 3 to be sold and a further 2 EOI to the buyer should they want more. The fleet was heading out the door.
What else was happening in 2019 ?

The EBA was being negotiated and the pilots actually started PIA.

This was nothing but scare tactics but nobody fell for it, apart from maybe you.
a_pilot is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Nov 2023, 02:21
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,439
Received 219 Likes on 75 Posts
Come on, no one knows what is going on behind closed doors, I would be amazed if anyone in Collingwood had any influence whatsoever in whether the 787s are or were being sold off. Certainly pilots have no influence on it, they are not refurbishing and installing lie flat rest because of Pilot pressure, they are doing it because someone in Qantas has said ‘India’ is an untapped market and the flights will require inflight rest.
Ollie Onion is online now  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 03:24
  #35 (permalink)  
ebt
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 236
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
Come on, no one knows what is going on behind closed doors, I would be amazed if anyone in Collingwood had any influence whatsoever in whether the 787s are or were being sold off. Certainly pilots have no influence on it, they are not refurbishing and installing lie flat rest because of Pilot pressure, they are doing it because someone in Qantas has said ‘India’ is an untapped market and the flights will require inflight rest.
And let's be honest, things may change considerably between now and when the first frames go in for their refit. The plan back in 2007 was that the -8s were a stopgap until the lower seat-km cost 787-9s come in, and then they were going to replace the A330s over at QF. For a laundry list of reasons, that has changed. Now JQ longhaul must be paying its way, but as Bali, Japan and Korea are likely to become XLR territory (if it can make it), pushing the -8s onto longer routes is not a bad idea, especially if you can tap the large volume, low yield markets like India and the thicker SE Asia routes.

Yes, they should have had crew rest from the start, but these were never intended to hang around as long as they did. So, yeah.
ebt is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 03:24
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
they are doing it because someone in Qantas has said ‘India’ is an untapped market and the flights will require inflight rest.
More likely someone in Jetstar said, Qantas have established good returns on Indian market, let's take it.
The The is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 14th Nov 2023, 03:40
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
Come on, no one knows what is going on behind closed doors, I would be amazed if anyone in Collingwood had any influence whatsoever in whether the 787s are or were being sold off.
Correct. It was a decision Gareth made, and signed off by Alan. MS was then sent in to get rid of them. He put 3 on the market.

Gareth wouldn’t be doing that as a scare tactic. Sure, they never made money, drag on the business, but he would actually just do it to p!$$ off the pilots, a form of punishment for striking against him, regardless of cost. That’s the sort of people this group deals with. Same garbage over in the west at the moment.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 09:20
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Round the corner
Age: 61
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by PoppaJo
You’re spinning it the wrong way.

What was on the whiteboard in Collingwood in 2019? That’s right, 3 to be sold and a further 2 EOI to the buyer should they want more. The fleet was heading out the door.

2022 onwards the dynamics changed.

Margins soared. That part of group is making green earnings for the first time ever. The decision has now changed to hold them. Great for everyone, but don’t act like the past was unicorns and rainbows.
Its nearly 2024 mate. Im not really sure what you are trying to achieve. Refferencing 2019? What ever works for your argument I guess but why the angst?

No one mentioned anything about unicorns and rainbows. No crying bus driver interviews on tv during covid for the JQ 787 crew.

Get some holidays or bid onto a wide body fleet PJ. You obviously need a change from whatever you are doing currently.

MCD
ManillaChillaDilla is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 12:04
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by ManillaChillaDilla
Its nearly 2024 mate. Im not really sure what you are trying to achieve. Refferencing 2019? What ever works for your argument I guess but why the angst?

No one mentioned anything about unicorns and rainbows. No crying bus driver interviews on tv during covid for the JQ 787 crew.

Get some holidays or bid onto a wide body fleet PJ. You obviously need a change from whatever you are doing currently.

MCD
Correct, it’s time to long move on. However those above had a crack at those from 5 years ago, not me, and was simply advising that these people might have been right back then, but they are wrong today. But to simply say these people have always been wrong, and are just out to bitch and moan, every single day, isn’t right. Don’t use a change in market dynamics to throw people under the bus, who now hold an invalid point vs prior. Of course they are all wrong today, and if anyone today carried on that the fleet was going, well they need the head checked.

Last edited by PoppaJo; 14th Nov 2023 at 12:28.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 16:18
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Its nearly 2024 mate. Im not really sure what you are trying to achieve. Refferencing 2019?
Mate, yes, its nearly 2024, but back then so many people mentioned that the Jetstar 787 is dead and gone.

Only now we can see who was right or wrong and I finally get to have my say.

No point arguing with such know it all's back then. Only 5 years later we can see now how their knowledge was so full of 5hit.

Last edited by a_pilot; 14th Nov 2023 at 16:30.
a_pilot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.