Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Australian Airline Pilot: Respected Profession or 'Noose around your Neck'

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Australian Airline Pilot: Respected Profession or 'Noose around your Neck'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Aug 2023, 03:38
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,795
Received 425 Likes on 233 Posts
Originally Posted by neville_nobody
If that’s not enough then just have a look at the US tax rates compared to Australia for the amount of money you are being paid….
That really depends on domicile, some states are great, others you will get stung on payroll tax. But that being said, even the worst state would be better than the amount of tax we pay in Australia, when you add on all the hidden taxes we pay as well. Also depending on your level of investments the tax return system is very different with the IRS. Then everything is cheaper (depending on state taxes that is), cars, travel, basic food and housing. Just make sure you have a good health insurance plan, again nothing that's extra to what we pay in Australia, as most pilots will be required to have private insurance or pay medicare levies, however if you skimp on insurance in the US you will be facing huge bills if you attend hospital, and may not even get into some places in a timely manner (or at all) without insurance.
43Inches is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 03:47
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,074
Received 148 Likes on 66 Posts
That really depends on domicile, some states are great, others you will get stung on payroll tax. But that being said, even the worst state would be better than the amount of tax we pay in Australia, when you add on all the hidden taxes we pay as well. Also depending on your level of investments the tax return system is very different with the IRS.
Yes it is very location dependant and you can throw in land tax in some states there as well. However if you look at what is deductible and the overall amount of tax you pay you are a long way in front in the USA on high salaries.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 06:06
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 110 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
Local currency compared to local living costs is the important factor, however most of us understand that in general living costs in the USA are lower than in Australia. So if the US pilots are being paid much better than Australian pilots after conversion, then they are doing much, much better when compared to living costs. So the point still stands that Australia is far behind them in real terms.

PS the US "smallest aircraft" hourly rate for the US airlines is an A220 or A319, not a widebody. The US "largest aircraft" payrates are for 787/777 or A350 no where near as big as an A380.
Yep, fair enough. I was only trying to say that for those in Aus you don’t have to be poorly paid. That top rate I quoted was for the 787.
ScepticalOptomist is online now  
Old 13th Aug 2023, 09:52
  #244 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Goblin Town
Posts: 209
Received 209 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
Conversion isn’t useful - it’s the currency in the country you live that’s important.
What you are looking for is Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) which is available on the OECD Data page: OECD Data: Purchasing Power Parities

Purchasing power parities (PPPs) are the rates of currency conversion that try to equalise the purchasing power of different currencies, by eliminating the differences in price levels between countries. The basket of goods and services priced is a sample of all those that are part of final expenditures: final consumption of households and government, fixed capital formation, and net exports. This indicator is measured in terms of national currency per US dollar.

Here is the data for the last 10 years - it is evident that in 2022 A$1.419 buys you the same as US$1.00.
So, if you want to know what you should be earning in Australia, in order to have Purchasing Power Parity with your US peers, simply take their US$ rates x 1.419



Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
Top of scale (4th year) Capt widebody 2023 rate: $409/hour. Monthly guarantee approx 78.5hrs.
You'll need A$603 per hour to hold Purchasing Power Parity with your US peers - but wait, even at that rate you'll pay 45% tax in FY2324. Your US peers, should they choose to live in California (highest State Tax), will top out at approximately 37.6% tax

Not saying the US is a better place to live, or not - but merely comparing like for like in the profession.

Last edited by RealSatoshi; 13th Aug 2023 at 15:22.
RealSatoshi is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by RealSatoshi:
Old 13th Aug 2023, 22:53
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,795
Received 425 Likes on 233 Posts
On the coin those airline pilots are on now, the USA is definitely a better place to live. It really is a place where if you have money you can use it, granted there's a few more nuts around, but most of the problems with living in the USA is when you are at the lower end of the income spectrum. As a pilot there's really no better place to be, the GA and Warbird scene is unparalleled, airshows everywhere, cheap planes, lots of places to fly, FBOs to look after you, no CASA, other flying folk are friendly and down to earth.
43Inches is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2023, 13:33
  #246 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Goblin Town
Posts: 209
Received 209 Likes on 65 Posts
Could it be that the proverbial 'Noose' is slowly unravelling - Advertising for Pilots at the Woolies entrance must be a new LOW



Last edited by RealSatoshi; 15th Aug 2023 at 02:22.
RealSatoshi is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 03:45
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,300
Received 334 Likes on 127 Posts
For QANTAS or for Woolies?
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 05:29
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,339
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
Advertising for Pilots at the Woolies entrance
Or Woolies must be needing night fillers and the labour hire company they've outsourced it to are recruiting?
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 07:04
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,304
Received 426 Likes on 213 Posts
Plenty of ex-Qantas employees are doing fulfilling work for Woolies and other supermarkets.
Lead Balloon is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2023, 12:49
  #250 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Goblin Town
Posts: 209
Received 209 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer
For QANTAS or for Woolies?
It seems to be a very tight race


RealSatoshi is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by RealSatoshi:
Old 16th Aug 2023, 01:37
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,300
Received 334 Likes on 127 Posts
More questions than answers RS.

Is a ‘Replenishment Associate’ a bartender?
HTF is ‘Team Member’ a job title?
WTF do ‘Night Team Members’ get paid $2 a month less than ‘Team Members’?

I’m somewhat relieved a Dash 8 captain is paid more than the bakery manager at Woolies. No wonder QANTAS is try to recruit there.
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2023, 03:23
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In the soup
Posts: 214
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Cross post from US thread

A QLink equivalent US regional is now offering USD$175000 signing bonuses for direct entry captains, plus a USD$50k yearly retention bonus. No reason Aus carriers shouldn't be offering something similar for an ever shrinking talent pool. This hits a little harder than a Woolies ad


DropYourSocks is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2023, 04:33
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,467
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by DropYourSocks
A QLink equivalent US regional is now offering USD$175000 signing bonuses for direct entry captains, plus a USD$50k yearly retention bonus. No reason Aus carriers shouldn't be offering something similar for an ever shrinking talent pool. This hits a little harder than a Woolies ad

What about those who haven’t got the 1,000 hours flying on a FAA licence to sit in the left chair? Even though they have 1,000s of hours on type in the left chair operating under a foreign licence.

Doubt that there is any way to get around this FAA requirement….

The last Dash 8 operator that I flew for in Australia baulked at my request for a salary increase when I fronted management. The discussion went quickly south immediately after I made my demands, that were reasonable.

I’d already made my mind up before the meeting if I didn’t get what I wanted. My resignation immediately followed! And I wasn’t the first one to do this.


Most of the regionals will not negotiate, even if your only trying to get a donut.

Last edited by Duck Pilot; 16th Aug 2023 at 20:41.
Duck Pilot is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2023, 04:44
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 189
Received 113 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by RealSatoshi
It seems to be a very tight race


So our ‘Valued’ dash 8 FOs who smash out 4-6 sectors days in CTAFs are paid the same as a wollies customer service team member. Where the f@$k did we go wrong as a profession?
davidclarke is offline  
The following 6 users liked this post by davidclarke:
Old 16th Aug 2023, 05:04
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: In the soup
Posts: 214
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Duck Pilot
What about those who haven’t got the 1,000 hours flying on a FAA licence to sit in the left chair? Even though they have 1,000s of hours on type in the left chair operating under a foreign licence.

Doubt that there is any way to get around this FAA requirement….

The last Dash 8 operator that I flew for in Australia baulked at the my request for a salary increase when I fronted management. The discussion went quickly south immediately after I made my demands, that were reasonable.

I’d already made my mind up before the meeting if I didn’t get what I wanted. My resignation immediately followed! And I wasn’t the first one to do this.


Most of the regionals will not negotiate, even if your only trying to get a donut.
No way around the 1000 part 121 time unfortunately. That's just a fact of life we've all had to deal with. I posted more so to show that a lowly US regional can pay a 50 seat RJ captain $300k* for their first year and still be viable. Why shouldn't Aus pilots make similar?

I also think it's interesting that Rex is offering their $30k signing bonus. It's the same thing the US regionals started doing in 2017, and the dollar amount is even almost the same. Can't help but wonder if in 6 years from now we'll see the same gains in Aus as the US has had in that timeframe.

*read the fine print of signing bonuses, not all that glitters etc...*
DropYourSocks is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by DropYourSocks:
Old 22nd Aug 2023, 10:02
  #256 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Goblin Town
Posts: 209
Received 209 Likes on 65 Posts
It is being reported that Qantas is close to ordering an as yet undisclosed number of Boeing 787-10's as a replacement for it's ageing Airbus A330 fleet:

Qantas Airways nears new Boeing 787 widebody order

If this is indeed the case, with the emphasis being that it will be a replacement for the A330 - then it is prudent to raise a few insightful points before the A330 Replacement propaganda machine moves to TOGA Thrust!

Let's start by acknowledging the B787-10 differences when compared to the current B787-9:
  • 5.27m Longer
  • 0.1m Higher
  • 44 kN more Total Thrust
  • 1 292 Nm less Range
  • 15% more Pax Capacity (Configuration Dependant)
All this is obvious, but it raises a question on how the Strategic Imperatives will be framed to get it across the proverbial line...(again).

Why is this hyperbolic question important - well, here you go:
When comparing the entry level A330, A330/A350 SFF and B787 rates in the current EBA, there is a lot of evidence that some sort of Strategic Imperative will be sought or explored

B787 Captain = A330 Captain +18.36% and A330/A350 SFF Captain +12.73%
B787 First Officer = A330 First Officer + 37.03% and A330/A350 SFF First Officer + 30.49%

We all say times have changed, but have they really - It is difficult to imagine that the company will blindly accept higher crew rates (for the same function aka A330 Replacement ), at the magnitude outlined above, without first exploring other avenues to create yet more downward pressure...

This is not fact, but a hyperbolic opinion for which all should be prepared - who knows what leverage they will pull next.
RealSatoshi is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2023, 10:24
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: centre of my universe
Posts: 309
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Those numbers don’t really account for a few other things. 321XLR is also a 330 replacement. Those crews much cheaper on SH award. All longer range flying done by 787-10 will be cheaper than having 332’s operating eg BNE-LAX. The company has done the Math. Turfing the Old OT rule set is definitely part of equation. It’s actually cheaper to have PSN too.
Poto is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2023, 12:47
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Poto
Those numbers don’t really account for a few other things. 321XLR is also a 330 replacement. Those crews much cheaper on SH award. All longer range flying done by 787-10 will be cheaper than having 332’s operating eg BNE-LAX. The company has done the Math. Turfing the Old OT rule set is definitely part of equation. It’s actually cheaper to have PSN too.
The differences are not night and day. 321 flying will be done on the Short Haul Agreement (not award) vs widebody aircraft on the Long Haul Agreement (not award). Hourly rates for a short haul pilots are higher than 330 pilots. The difference would be if the sector requires 3 crew for the 330 and if there are night credits or other additions to pay. Without running a spreadsheet, I would say the difference is not that great, and probably not enough to influence what aircraft flies the route. I would think capacity and fuel burn would be much more a factor. Regarding the 787 to 330 comparison, what is really important is what the total scope of flying will be and looking at how many hours you have flown, number of days worked and how much you get paid. There will be a sector length where 330 conditions will see you paid more than the equivalent on the 787, however, the 787 gets paid more on the shorter sectors (that the 330 mostly flies). I don't think there are many complaints from 787 FOs and Captains when they compare their pay to 330 pilot pay (yes, there is the elephant in the room regarding SO pay rates).
theheadmaster is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2023, 19:06
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Towards the Front
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
Haven’t they tried Altara at QF? Not a foreign sub contractor, but still a step in that direction.

Upgraded is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2023, 22:43
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Dirty South
Posts: 449
Received 22 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ScepticalOptomist
Yep, fair enough. I was only trying to say that for those in Aus you don’t have to be poorly paid. That top rate I quoted was for the 787.
Interesting metric. Safe to assume that there aren’t any first year 787 first officers and zero fourth year 787 Captains at Qantas ? For the sake of the argument let’s assume 12- 15 years to 787 FO and 25 - 30 years for 787 CA. Not so different in the U.S for the Captains, however the U.S. FO may be anywhere from 1 to 12 years depending on the airline. If my assumptions are correct, here are the comparative pay U.S pay rates for your example -

787 FO $285.22 (USD)

787 CA $417.54 (USD)

Even If we ignore buying power, cost of living, exchange rates and taxes; your statement defending QANTAS pay isn’t accurate.






JPJP is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.