Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

QF144 Auckland to Sydney engine out

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

QF144 Auckland to Sydney engine out

Old 23rd Jan 2023, 00:10
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The townsville refueller has it on good advice, that is was a catastrophic thronomeister failure, that caused the shutdown

Last edited by timbo1; 23rd Jan 2023 at 00:11. Reason: typo
timbo1 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 03:56
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,010
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by timbo1 View Post
The townsville refueller has it on good advice, that is was a catastrophic thronomeister failure, that caused the shutdown
Perhaps it was a current generation engine which simply decided to “lie flat.”
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 07:25
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Upthere
Posts: 61
Received 10 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer View Post
Perhaps it was a current generation engine which simply decided to “lie flat.”
I've heard that instead of it being the left, it was the right phalange.
VHOED191006 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 07:55
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 314
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by VHOED191006 View Post
We all have one common goal: to reassure the public that flying is safe. Unfortunately, those effects are being diminished by the constant circus show and tomfoolery that the media displays. Perhaps we should all start a movement, directed at the media, to do a similar act of what the French did to their royal family!
I read an article a while back (can't remember where unfortunately) and it was titled something like "What the media gets wrong about aviation".

It went into quite a bit of depth, even criticizing the use of the term 'tarmac' for everything not grass at an airport. Of course, the majority of major airports have concrete runways, taxiways and aprons and tarmac is a road surface material.

Perhaps someone should set up a website, a la 'Media Watch' that highlights errors in the media v.v. aviation.

Lots of material. If anyone has time, look at the occasional article (space filler) in Traveler and other newspaper travel sections that occasionally rehash articles about various aspects of aviation. Not one of them seems to have even the benefit of looking at wikipedia, let alone even bothering to do a nanosecond of research, with very, very basic errors.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 18:15
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,293
Received 53 Likes on 23 Posts
The media kept saying they ‘lost and engine over the Tasman Sea’, I hope they can find it!
Ollie Onion is online now  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 21:48
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Age: 100
Posts: 1,298
Received 22 Likes on 11 Posts
I have been told that the failure was the quill shaft which drives the accessory gear box which is one of those failures that you don’t hear discussed as a possibility. Fairly instant way of winding an engine down.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2023, 23:56
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 272
Received 26 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion View Post
The media kept saying they ‘lost and engine over the Tasman Sea’, I hope they can find it!
And while we’re at it….there’s often a difference between an engine failure and an engine shutdown. The “lost” engine may have failed or it may not but it doesn’t have to “fail” to be shutdown.
C441 is online now  
Old 26th Jan 2023, 02:37
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: London
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective View Post
...it was a comment on how an MBA and having seen an aeroplane fly over once are about all the qualifications required to be an airport manager or a senior departmental manager in one of the most complex, specialist industries in the world.
It's not rocket science.
rb14 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2023, 05:23
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 70
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by rb14 View Post
It's not rocket science.
The main task of any manager senior middle or other is not to accept responsibility for anything, it's always somebody else's fault.
Cedrik is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2023, 10:24
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 314
Received 25 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Cedrik View Post
The main task of any manager senior middle or other is not to accept responsibility for anything, it's always somebody else's fault.
That never used to be the case, but some of the absolute drones and Dunning-Kruger case-studies in positions now it wouldn't surprise me. Even if they get wedged and look like having to take responsibility, they trot out all the weasel word 'reaching out' nonsense and 'resetting expectations, going forward, so they can 'celebrate' success'.
AerialPerspective is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.