Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Auckland to New York Qantas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Aug 2022, 23:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,439
Received 218 Likes on 75 Posts
Auckland to New York Qantas

As part of the financial results today it was announced a new route Auckland to New York on the 787 commencing in 2023. It also said the flights are timed to connect to Australian desinations. Will this go Auckland direct to NYC like Air NZ or are they talking NZ to OZ to connect to an international service?
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2022, 23:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,301
Received 359 Likes on 197 Posts
Not exactly earth shattering, they were flying AKL-LAX years ago.

Must be when the next slate of 78s are due to arrive.
dr dre is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2022, 23:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Ollie Onion
As part of the financial results today it was announced a new route Auckland to New York on the 787 commencing in 2023. It also said the flights are timed to connect to Australian desinations. Will this go Auckland direct to NYC like Air NZ or are they talking NZ to OZ to connect to an international service?
this is just another scheme to use non australian based staff, these flight's will be crewed by cheaper more compliant nz based flight attendant's. no crew rest needed
unobtanium is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2022, 08:06
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: melbourne
Posts: 787
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by dr dre
Not exactly earth shattering, they were flying AKL-LAX years ago.

Must be when the next slate of 78s are due to arrive.
Yeh,he said 3 new 78's are coming next year.
I would be using Air NZ if i was travelling,thats for sure.
blubak is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2022, 09:50
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,439
Received 218 Likes on 75 Posts
Originally Posted by Beryllium Erbium
If I'm going via Aukland to the States it's with ANZ, a far superior product.

Likewise, always good to have fallback options though.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2022, 13:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Why would anyone (at least from Australia) want to go via Auckland in the first place?
havick is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2022, 14:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: NSW
Posts: 267
Received 180 Likes on 58 Posts
Why would anyone want to travel on QF over almost any other carrier if you didn't have to. If you are going via AKL, you'd want to be travelling air NZ.
cLeArIcE is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2022, 14:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 452
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by havick
Why would anyone (at least from Australia) want to go via Auckland in the first place?
Well just think about it for a minute assuming you are going to New York.
I would much rather transit through AKL than LAX any day thanks.
On eyre is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2022, 15:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: messemate way to bondi icebergs
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by On eyre
Well just think about it for a minute assuming you are going to New York.
I would much rather transit through AKL than LAX any day thanks.
100% AKL transfer is way better than LAX.

QF are forced to have a crack at this because they dilly dallied with their A350 Sunrise clickbait propaganda. If they got their A350s when they were supposed to, the travelling Australian public would be bypassing NZ all together en route the NYC.

AirNz are a good product (better is debatable) and AKL is much better than JFK. QF had to react on that route.
drshmoo is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2022, 01:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel capacity

I imagine the route has been planned via AKL due to range issues when flying westbound against the prevailing winds. Northbound is not so much of an issue provided holding times are reasonable at JFK.
tamaki1 is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2022, 12:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Queensland
Posts: 172
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give me the QF J cabin anyday over the current NZ hideous J config.
Wonderworld is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2022, 04:05
  #12 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,881
Received 154 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Wonderworld
Give me the QF J cabin anyday over the current NZ hideous J config.
When I read your post last night, I had a look at the ANZ J cabin layout. It’s very strange indeed!!
SOPS is online now  
Old 27th Aug 2022, 05:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Foran is dumping all the Kiwi ‘innovations’ in bizarre product design and is going with the more conventional German options starting in a few years.



PoppaJo is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2022, 17:28
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 344
Received 64 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Beryllium Erbium
You should try it some time, it's not behd.
When QF101/100 used to operate to LAX it was always full, often oversold every night. It was a very popular option. Albeit it was the same aeroplane all the way through from MEL but for MEL-LAX traffic it cut out the side-show at SYD and usual inevitable aircraft change and was two reasonable sized sectors and not one short one then 14-15 hours.
AerialPerspective is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2022, 02:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SA
Age: 63
Posts: 2,326
Received 136 Likes on 99 Posts
Seems to be an option worth considering, especially if there are reasonable connections to a range of Australian and New Zealand cities or easy and reasonable stop-over arrangements. I recall that ANZ briefly operated AKL-SYD-LAX.
sunnySA is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2022, 03:26
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: in a bubble
Posts: 99
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by unobtanium
this is just another scheme to use non australian based staff, these flight's will be crewed by cheaper more compliant nz based flight attendant's. no crew rest needed
Probably some truth to this however I’d imagine the savings using NZ CC would be minimal in the grand scheme of things. All of the b789s have CC rest facilities. No sleeping on seat.
onezeroonethree is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2022, 07:06
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 108
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by onezeroonethree
Probably some truth to this however I’d imagine the savings using NZ CC would be minimal in the grand scheme of things. All of the b789s have CC rest facilities. No sleeping on seat.

inb4 Qantas sell the crew rest bunks to passengers and then make the crew sleep over lower yielding economy seats
Sparrows. is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2022, 18:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,281
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Thank goodness we have the peanut gallery to advise QF and others how to run the airline!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2022, 22:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
Originally Posted by AerialPerspective
When QF101/100 used to operate to LAX it was always full, often oversold every night. It was a very popular option. Albeit it was the same aeroplane all the way through from MEL but for MEL-LAX traffic it cut out the side-show at SYD and usual inevitable aircraft change and was two reasonable sized sectors and not one short one then 14-15 hours.
The operation failed when the 747 AKL-LAX was replaced with a 330 which carried on to JFK. The high value freight which was carried on the 747 from LAX-JFK now went on a Polar or Atlas aircraft meaning the 747 freight capacity was no longer required. As the Qantas 330 product was no match for the ANZ 777 from AKL-LAX, the loads collapsed and the route was canned.

The 'genius' of silo-ing departments…...
C441 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2022, 00:06
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by onezeroonethree
Probably some truth to this however I’d imagine the savings using NZ CC would be minimal in the grand scheme of things. All of the b789s have CC rest facilities. No sleeping on seat.
quantas will spend a dollar to save a cent, the costs involved in hiring nz crew flying and housing them in syd for training, sending managers over to 'setup and oversee' operations, all to shaft the australian crew. good jolly's for the execs though, need to visit there troop's overseas often for photo op's and yammer post's
unobtanium is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.