Home Quarantine for Aircrew
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the front of a vintage Dash 8 that should be in a museum
Age: 51
Posts: 1,254
Home quarantine would be better than being in a hotel that’s set on fire! On day 10 this happened
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-...tion/100656756
What more could go wrong?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-11-...tion/100656756
What more could go wrong?
Last edited by Duck Pilot; 1st Dec 2021 at 09:19.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: They seek him here, they seek him there
Posts: 140
Well, its now two and a bit full business days since Dom P’s (updated) media release stating the 14 day Flight Crew iso period would be reduced to 72 hours.
The current Public Health Orders commenced just over an hour prior to his media release. It contained all the other changes highlighted in the media release but, as best as I can tell, there is no relief for Flight Crew isolation periods within.
I will happily stand corrected if I am misreading the Order or if there is other information in the public realm I am not aware of.
Given how quickly Public Health Order changes have been made in the past, perhaps its time to get back on Twitter and/or keep writing to the local member to keep Dom P to his word.
The current Public Health Orders commenced just over an hour prior to his media release. It contained all the other changes highlighted in the media release but, as best as I can tell, there is no relief for Flight Crew isolation periods within.
I will happily stand corrected if I am misreading the Order or if there is other information in the public realm I am not aware of.
Given how quickly Public Health Order changes have been made in the past, perhaps its time to get back on Twitter and/or keep writing to the local member to keep Dom P to his word.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 765
Correct - still 14 days for crew and 72 hours for pax - disgraceful the power these “Health Departments” wield. Absolutely zero justification (I'd love to know if they actually THINK there is a valid reason for the discrepancy between pax and crew!) provided for what is an obviously ridiculous rule. Anyone who can, please exert pressure on the powers that be…
Last edited by josephfeatherweight; 3rd Dec 2021 at 02:06.
Nunc est bibendum
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,581
Takes a while to update these things… particularly when they’ve changed.
Everything I’ve read publicly says ‘72 hours’ for aircrew so that’s what I’m going with at the moment. If they want to take me to court to fight it I’ve plenty of screen shots of government websites that indicate the current requirements.
Everything I’ve read publicly says ‘72 hours’ for aircrew so that’s what I’m going with at the moment. If they want to take me to court to fight it I’ve plenty of screen shots of government websites that indicate the current requirements.
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 128
Sure makes following the rules difficult when what we are given makes it next to impossible to follow.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: They seek him here, they seek him there
Posts: 140
When the will is there, the NSW Government has been quite quick in amending Public Health Orders after a decision is taken. I suggest that the will is not there for this particular change, hence the contention that further lobbying from interested parties may be needed.
Last edited by GaryGnu; 3rd Dec 2021 at 03:11. Reason: Removed paragraph
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 765
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 730