Jetstar and Ballina again
Maybe, or maybe I am going to apply some common-sense to grasping claim...
Where on earth did you get you information traffic?
Not exactly a reputable source..
triadic,
Re Ballina, my initial review, and it could be flawed, ie aerodrome list (Plan B) Proposed C 180 - 8500, E 8500 - 6500, G 6500 - 0007, Original C 180 - 8500, G 8500 - 0007,
No mention of SAFIS anymore?
If no SAFIS and only E inserted from 8500 to 6500 then Plan B changes for Ballina will be earth shatteringly.............................
.........Microscopic!
As I stated on the other thread Plan A - Fantasy Plan B - Confidence Trick
Airservices = Chutzpah!
Re Ballina, my initial review, and it could be flawed, ie aerodrome list (Plan B) Proposed C 180 - 8500, E 8500 - 6500, G 6500 - 0007, Original C 180 - 8500, G 8500 - 0007,
No mention of SAFIS anymore?
If no SAFIS and only E inserted from 8500 to 6500 then Plan B changes for Ballina will be earth shatteringly.............................
.........Microscopic!
As I stated on the other thread Plan A - Fantasy Plan B - Confidence Trick
Airservices = Chutzpah!
https://engage.airservicesaustralia....qanda#tool_tab
Portable and cheap ADSB traffic systems for VFR were approved in July 2020, so the game has changed. A Sky Echo ADSB in/out VFR box is the size of a fag packet, mounts on the window of any lighty and costs $900 - every user and other IFR can see each other out to 40miles. These incidents would virtually stop overnight if CASA were to mandate ADSB in CTAFs where RPT operate.
Midair collision USA
Watch a video sometime of a jet crew below say 5,000’ and see how much free time they have to look out of the window. I really am quite invested and eager to see all traffic relevant to me, but I often don’t.
Originally Posted by roundsounds
This recent accident in the USA highlights midair’s still occur within controlled airspace and I’m sure the Cirrus would have been equipped with the latest tech.
Directed traffic, see and avoid, what could possibly go wrong. Well now we have an example. Lets hope that an A320 or 737 can survive the impact that the Metro did.
Originally Posted by Lookleft
Directed traffic, see and avoid, what could possibly go wrong. Well now we have an example.
SFIS will save you!
(I have no idea what deep insights the Santa Fe Indian School has about airspace categorisation and service provision, but I'll trust Airservices and CASA on this one. Or maybe it's the Southern Forests Irrigation Scheme...)
(I have no idea what deep insights the Santa Fe Indian School has about airspace categorisation and service provision, but I'll trust Airservices and CASA on this one. Or maybe it's the Southern Forests Irrigation Scheme...)
Bloggsy I didn't say that the Metro got DTI, but the SR22 was given traffic on the 172. I can't answer what the Metro pilot was thinking other than he thought he had an engine failure.
10J.... Any date this year would be a stretch of a long bow, but maybe ASA don't have a long bow? As you would know consultation (in AvSEF) still needs to take place and a safety case provided to industry and then when agreed (?) upon an AIP SUP needs to be drafted and approved by CASA and then distributed, not only to those near BNA/MNG but to all that may use/transit that airspace, followed by an education program. ASA have not yet demonstrated any professionalism in this proposal and certainly no transparency in their thinking. Maybe it is time to think outside the box and for ASA to seek outside input?
Of course, if there is political pressure, anything is possible.
Of course, if there is political pressure, anything is possible.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Abeam Alice Springs
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
See this link for further info: https://consultation.casa.gov.au/sta...eq-congestion/
https://engage.airservicesaustralia....mation-service
Updated info on BNA SAFIS on portal, August 12 is now target date, they are running webex online consultation forums every week until then.
Updated info on BNA SAFIS on portal, August 12 is now target date, they are running webex online consultation forums every week until then.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OZZZZZZZZZZZ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
- SFIS is not a separation service, it does not provide clearances, and it does not sequence aircraft into an aerodrome.