Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

REX to transition to ATRs, start domestic jet ops

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

REX to transition to ATRs, start domestic jet ops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Feb 2022, 22:50
  #1801 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 618
Received 154 Likes on 49 Posts
Interesting opinion 43” but I see it very differently. .
Qantas’s debt was actually lower this half than the previous half. Sold off underused property.
Net debt is now at $5.5bn. Prior to COVID it was at $4.7bn in a much higher interest rate environment.
Not much of an increase in debt and the terms of the debt will be much better.

Qantas have weathered the extreme adversity of COVID surprisingly well. Despite not asking for a bailout, they received hundreds of millions of dollars in government assistance. They have used the pandemic to be fairly ruthless in reducing costs. Ground handlers and cleaners all outsourced, pushing through company-wide multi-year wage freezes, or possibly worse for our cabin crew colleagues.

It is looking like the world (and even WA) is emerging from COVID restrictions so I expect Qantas to return to bumper profits, having trimmed their costs and increased their domestic market share.

All that being said, I think QF IR are a disgrace they treat their employees very poorly, but I don’t think they’ll be going broke.
Beer Baron is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2022, 23:13
  #1802 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
It is looking like the world (and even WA) is emerging from COVID restrictions so I expect Qantas to return to bumper profits, having trimmed their costs and increased their domestic market share.
The world in moving out of Covid and into international security issues, International travel will cop another hit and interest rates to pay for the military escalation and covid debts are starting to mount already. QF will not be in a low interest environment for long. To put this in perspective, Rex so far has $40 mil in actual loans debt out of $77m line of credit at currently 2% of used credit (as per the 1/2 year report), these amounts are group wide, so the loan amount is spread among the pel-air ventures AAPA and other things. It owes PAG $70mil out of a total of $150mil, however that is convertible notes, so PAG can be given/take Rex shares at discount instead of debt, the loss was more because of more draw down of PAG investment, however cashflow and net available liquidity was stable. Virgin will be the same arrangement with Bain supporting losses, if any, until it stands up on it's own and then there will be a float. The aim here will be for all entrants to take market share from QF and force openings in the slot system into the main hubs. QF has had to sell/lease back assets to keep debt to a minimum and does not have an equity partner it can trade shares for equity at present, it has run out of high value assets to sell, so you wont be seeing much more of that coming up. At present the QF sale act restricts it from selling anymore shares to an overseas investor so that avenue is blocked. From what I see of QF at the moment its loads are not huge and they are struggling to crew everything. Add to that industrial stands that spell last ditch efforts to cut costs like cutting loose EBAs instead of negotiating. QF is in trouble there is no doubt, and its enemies are no longer on their knees, with another seemingly well backed entity coming as well, while I don't see Bonza as a huge threat it will suck passengers from the system overall. I see absolutely no chance of QF returning to huge profits in any near term scenario.

Last edited by 43Inches; 26th Feb 2022 at 23:32.
43Inches is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2022, 23:33
  #1803 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Al's Diner
Age: 64
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
QF is currently over 70% domestic owned. A couple of $b there in foreign investment if they really wanted, they just don’t want to dilute the share price whilst debt is a relatively cheaper option.

They also have much greater diversified business as opposed to Rex and even Virgin. A goliath FF program expanded into insurance etc and an exponentially growing freight business.
Potsie Weber is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2022, 23:40
  #1804 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Current foreign ownership as of the last notifications was just under 36%. No investment firm would be interested in 14% of a company unless they saw significant ROI, they would want significant returns and some for of meaningful board representation for Billions in investment, this has been the issue for a long time. Virgin had the same problem with too many entities spoiling the broth and none able to control direction to the point it was worth investing in. They just had Veto controls to ensure VA didn't cross their paths and interfere with their own agendas.

They also have much greater diversified business as opposed to Rex and even Virgin. A goliath FF program expanded into insurance etc and an exponentially growing freight business.
I agree to a point, but the cash cow for QF is its domestic operation, every opposition airline knows this, and it is always quoted as the "underlying profit maker". The FF program and other sundries are worth very little without QF airlines at the helm.

All you have to do is read the pilot responses to the customer complaint in the other thread about how QF pilots have no avenue to pass on critical customer suggestions to management that might be heard to see how fractured the company is.
43Inches is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2022, 23:54
  #1805 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,173
Received 201 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
... It owes PAG $70mil out of a total of $150mil, however that is convertible notes, so PAG can be given/take Rex shares at discount instead of debt, ...
Rex has currently drawn down $75 million, not $70 million. And PAG can't be given shares at a discount. The convertible notes issue to PAG is clear on a number of things. PAG determine the form of settlement - shares or cash - not Rex. And if PAG elect to take shares the issue price is $1.50 - if the shares are trading below that then Rex has to cover the difference. PAG are not going to be diddled by Rex on that deal.

Originally Posted by 43Inches
... At present the QF sale act restricts it from selling anymore shares to an overseas investor so that avenue is blocked.
The Sale Act does not block another shares placement so long as subsequent to the placement foreign ownership doesn't exceed the threshold 49 percent articulated in Part 3 of the Act. Qantas could easily launch another $1.5 billion equity raising through institutional placements and manage the foreign component.



MickG0105 is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2022, 23:56
  #1806 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
has run out of high value assets to sell, so you wont be seeing much more of that coming up
They could partially float Jetstar. Could still keep a large chunk of it but looking at its numbers pre pandemic, certainly would generate many billions. I know that probably won’t happen under AJ but it will one day under a future boss. Certainly is a business ripe to be partially offloaded.

Sell off Jetstar Japan and for heavens sakes just close Jetstar Asia.
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 26th Feb 2022, 23:58
  #1807 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
The Sale Act does not block another shares placement so long as subsequent to the placement foreign ownership doesn't exceed the threshold 49 percent articulated in Part 3 of the Act. Qantas could easily launch another $1.5 billion equity raising through institutional placements and manage the foreign component.
That still doesn't buy them a partner willing to pump funds in the likes of Bain and PAG, QFs big partners in crime such as emirates are also treading water, and QF burned its bridge with SQ. On that point you will probably find SQ probably getting cosy with either VA or Rex soon for on carriage. Share dilution is not something you do willy nilly, if the books really start looking bad the share price is likely to tank. My thoughts are that VA is going to seriously challenge QF in the domestic scene over the coming years, Rex will eke out a niche like it did with regional services. QF will have to temper its fever pitched hold the line at 60% however as it will be bleeding cash to do so.
43Inches is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 00:17
  #1808 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,173
Received 201 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
That still doesn't buy them a partner willing to pump funds in the likes of Bain and PAG, QFs big partners in crime such as emirates are also treading water, and QF burned its bridge with SQ. On that point you will probably find SQ probably getting cosy with either VA or Rex soon for on carriage. Share dilution is not something you do willy nilly, if the books really start looking bad the share price is likely to tank. My thoughts are that VA is going to seriously challenge QF in the domestic scene over the coming years, Rex will eke out a niche like it did with regional services. QF will have to temper its fever pitched hold the line at 60% however as it will be bleeding cash to do so.
You don't seem to understand how institutional placements work - why would you look for a partner when you can just get cash?

And share dilution isn't an issue because of those share buy backs, much maligned as they were from some quarters. The buy-backs afford Qantas significant flexibility in re-issuing shares via equity raisings. They could likely raise $1 billion next month without raising a sweat.

And it's probably worth noting that Qantas, even on the heels of those pretty ordinary HY1 results, is trading at a 37 percent premium to the placement price of the last institutional placement. As troubling as the last two years has been for the industry I'd much rather be in Qantas's shoes than Rex’s, or Bonza's (thongs, most likely for them).
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 00:33
  #1809 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
I think you really don't understand that a company can't just generate infinite shares from ever producing more shares. First they have to be worth something, to get the desired return, then there has to be willing buyers which is usually not an issue, and then you have to avoid diluting investors shares already invested. Every time you float more shares each share loses value, which turns off potential investors if that continues. Coles is going down a similar path to QF at the moment, its quest on dominating market share is seeing it setting up stores to compete with its other stores sometimes within a km of each other. The onus is then placing ever increasing pressure on labor to cut costs in staff numbers and conditions which are now below award. QF wont get away with that for pilots as its in a highly competetive environment so its starting with the stood down FAs and other segments. The writing is on the wall for both companies.
43Inches is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 02:02
  #1810 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,173
Received 201 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
I think you really don't understand that a company can't just generate infinite shares from ever producing more shares. First they have to be worth something, to get the desired return, then there has to be willing buyers which is usually not an issue, and then you have to avoid diluting investors shares already invested. Every time you float more shares each share loses value, which turns off potential investors if that continues. Coles is going down a similar path to QF at the moment, its quest on dominating market share is seeing it setting up stores to compete with its other stores sometimes within a km of each other. The onus is then placing ever increasing pressure on labor to cut costs in staff numbers and conditions which are now below award. QF wont get away with that for pilots as its in a highly competetive environment so its starting with the stood down FAs and other segments. The writing is on the wall for both companies.
No one is talking about infinite shares; that's simply a nonsensical straw man. Qantas bought back well over 500 million shares between 2012 - 2019; that gives them the flexibility to re-issue share via an equity raising without significantly diluting share value. That is not something that Rex has in its bag of tricks.

Rex's HY1 results are comparatively much worse than Qantas's. Rex's revenue for the half of $116.5 million was down by just $9 million on HY1-21 but their operating loss (EBITDA) was over $33 million. That compares to an operating profit for HY1-21 of $24.8 million off of revenue of $125 million. That's nearly a $60 million swing over a year. What's the fundamental difference between the six months to December 20 and the six months to December 21? Jet ops. It should be ringing alarm bells.
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 02:12
  #1811 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Yes, but its apples and oranges, Rex is in a rapid expansion phase, most would have a breakeven mark at two years plus with extremely steep startup costs in the first two years, I wont even add in Covid. QF is purely in damage control with its international ops on life support and its domestic just coming out of hibernation. Rex could probably drop a share float tomorrow and pick up 100mil in cash flow if it wanted to, as you said it's a matter currently of cheap loans add to that not wanting to dilute the share mix. Virgin did similar just before it crashed in a heap. There is a vast difference to floating shares for expansion or for life support and the market will respond accordingly.

PS in comparing the two airlines, they both had the same % increase in revenue of just over 34% Rex and 31% for QF. Comparing share value, Rex each share has a net tangible value of +$1.28 per share, where Qantas the tangible value has gone further negative to -0.35cents. That last bit really shows how bad QFs debt position is, the company has no tangible value if you broke it up.

Last edited by 43Inches; 27th Feb 2022 at 02:26.
43Inches is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 04:39
  #1812 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 1,173
Received 201 Likes on 99 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
Yes, but its apples and oranges, Rex is in a rapid expansion phase, most would have a breakeven mark at two years plus with extremely steep startup costs in the first two years, I wont even add in Covid. ...
Well, Rex's now halfway through that two year rapid expansion phase. How are they doing?

Originally Posted by 43Inches
Rex could probably drop a share float tomorrow and pick up 100mil in cash flow if it wanted to, ...
You cannot possibly believe that. Rex essentially doubled its issued shares with the PAG deal. There is no way possible that they could issue another $100 million in shares. That's just rank nonsense.

Originally Posted by 43Inches
... There is a vast difference to floating shares for expansion or for life support and the market will respond accordingly.
Well, we saw exactly how the market responded to Qantas's share placement "for life support" in late 2020. $1.36 billion raised from the institutional placement and the shares are currently trading at a 35 percent premium to the issue price.

Originally Posted by 43Inches
... Comparing share value, Rex each share has a net tangible value of +$1.28 per share, where Qantas the tangible value has gone further negative to -0.35cents. That last bit really shows how bad QFs debt position is, the company has no tangible value if you broke it up.
Now you're getting close to what Qantas's short-term problem is - I'm surprised no analyst has commented on it yet. That said, that "market" you were quoting earlier values their shares just north of $5 a pop. That is how the market views their recovery and future earnings potential. Through the pandemic Qantas's FF program alone generated four times the revenue and eight times the profit that Rex could manage in a very good year. But if you want to go long on Rex, I doubt anyone will look to get in your way.
​​​​​​​
​​​​​​​
MickG0105 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 05:04
  #1813 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Well, Rex's now halfway through that two year rapid expansion phase. How are they doing?
They are half way through their start up capital, so that says it all. The $150million was startup capital, that's what it's for, not sure what people expected that it just sits in a bank account and they would be profitable off the bat. They also just announced expansion to 30 aircraft so that says they are bullish on the next 12 months. So the answer is things look as though they are on plan, nothing spectacular, nothing bad.

You cannot possibly believe that. Rex essentially doubled its issued shares with the PAG deal. There is no way possible that they could issue another $100 million in shares. That's just rank nonsense.
Rex raised $150million to start up the jets on a share conversion deal, there is no doubt with the current 'actual' value of the company another deal worth $100 or even $150 million would be easy. Again this is QFs problem, they are losing big investors for blind faith mom and dads and other bets rather than commercial sense. If you were a large company looking to invest why would you bet on QF, theres no way to re-coop losses, the company is worth less than 1c per share in assets. You then have the issue that most of cash is tied up in the company maintaining profitability, so then the net tangible drops negative, thats why its worth -.35 cents a share. Rex you could buy in now and sell its assets for the price you paid for the shares, very low risk to a large player.

Well, we saw exactly how the market responded to Qantas's share placement "for life support" in late 2020. $1.36 billion raised from the institutional placement and the shares are currently trading at a 35 percent premium to the issue price.
Fools and their money soon parted. Joyce is good at spin, but the fundamentals are very bad for QF with all the competition going its way. QF and Telstra share the 'national' identity con, where Australians buy into anything at stupid prices just because they feel it's Australian. All they are doing is padding Joyces retirement plan as he spins creative accounting to make a lame duck look like it could win the Melbourne cup.

Now you're getting close to what Qantas's short-term problem is - I'm surprised no analyst has commented on it yet. That said, that "market" you were quoting earlier values their shares just north of $5 a pop. That is how the market views their recovery and future earnings potential. Through the pandemic Qantas's FF program alone generated four times the revenue and eight times the profit that Rex could manage in a very good year. But if you want to go long on Rex, I doubt anyone will look to get in your way.
This is far from short term, the creative accounting involved selling the silverware behind the scenes. The paydown in debt you mentioned that happened this half was bankrolled by the sale of QF owned Mascot land and facilities, some $600 million of assets gone exchanged to lease it back. QF has been gutted like VA was to the point its an operating shell with no physical value. That will never return to where it was.
43Inches is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 05:08
  #1814 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Dubbo
Posts: 97
Received 89 Likes on 34 Posts
Is that you John Sharp?
MikeHatter732 is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 05:12
  #1815 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Nope, just a realist, and I'm not just on Rex, I feel Virgin will be strong the next few years as its now in good position cashed up with cheap leases. As I said QF stuffed up and should have pushed for a handout for it and VA, it's better having debt nobbled opposition than a now financial giant backed lean operation.
43Inches is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 06:43
  #1816 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 96
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
I notice we haven’t heard from PoppaJo re pax loads for a while. That might be due to the fact load factors are really starting to pick up.

Using the past two weeks as an example, the total seats available on a significant amount of flights are in the single digits. Furthermore future bookings are looking very strong.

The MEL-OOL route seems to be the exception where they aren’t making the numbers at the moment.
transition_alt is online now  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 07:18
  #1817 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BBN
Posts: 984
Received 94 Likes on 45 Posts
Either way 43 is not an Aussie, not sure why they are so pro Rex all of a sudden.

The give is all in the spelling. We spell it Mum, not Mom. Post 1817.
SHVC is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 07:38
  #1818 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oz
Age: 68
Posts: 1,913
Received 295 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally Posted by transition_alt
I notice we haven’t heard from PoppaJo re pax loads for a while. That might be due to the fact load factors are really starting to pick up.

Using the past two weeks as an example, the total seats available on a significant amount of flights are in the single digits. Furthermore future bookings are looking very strong.

The MEL-OOL route seems to be the exception where they aren’t making the numbers at the moment.
Has most certainly been an uptick in demand across the board within the last week, mask removal rules across the east coast will boost confidence. We are only 4 weeks to run until Q4 when the big players are planning on 100% capacity.

Looking at the Rex numbers, today was busy, yesterday some good and bad patches. Mid week not overly fantastic but but better as the week closes out. Melbourne to Gold Coast however is not pretty as you say. Sydney should be busy for all this week with Mardi Gras etc.

April should hopefully be a good month for everyone with demand surging and everyone back at full rosters!
PoppaJo is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 07:55
  #1819 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 306
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Took off from ML (RWY16) to SY the other day directly behind REX. We had 175 punters on board. They outclimbed us by 7000’ at ALBAK. I don’t think they had many on board……… unless they were going full rated at best rate
No Idea Either is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2022, 07:58
  #1820 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
This is a traditional low time for leisure travel in Australia, but possibly some uptick this year due to people travelling to catch up with family and get some face to face business done post covid. Queensland might stay a bit sedated with the weather pattern that's smashing them at the moment. I've noticed a few people doing silly things like going to the pacific islands during hurricane season just because of pent up travel bugs. Things you would normally avoid unless you really needed the cheaper fares. There's also not much or no cruising at the moment so that whole sector of leisure travel is still completely missing.
43Inches is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.