A320 mess Sydney
Yeh, nobody ever made a mistake in Ansett
A review of events associated with the introduction of the B747 indicated that organisational factors involving both Ansett and the Civil Aviation Authority led to a situation where there was increased potential for an accident of this nature to occur. These factors included deficiencies in the planning and implementation of the introduction program for the new aircraft, particularly with respect to manuals, procedures and line training. In addition, all regulatory requirements were not observed, nor were they enforced.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South of equator
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely with Ollie, Studentindebt, burnt_out etc on this one.
If there isn't enough time to brief after report, then there isn't enough time. 99% of the time its sufficient.That 1% then the flight departs late, so be it. Safety before OTP. If they want 100% OTP the airline can pay for me to come in earlier.
Bet if if they reduced your report time to near nothing you'd be up in arms! (i find it odd that some are not already about a 15 min briefing time! How is that safe?)
If there isn't enough time to brief after report, then there isn't enough time. 99% of the time its sufficient.That 1% then the flight departs late, so be it. Safety before OTP. If they want 100% OTP the airline can pay for me to come in earlier.
Bet if if they reduced your report time to near nothing you'd be up in arms! (i find it odd that some are not already about a 15 min briefing time! How is that safe?)
Most airlines would be using iPads and a few minutes spent reviewing FP/WX/NOTAMs prior to arriving at work definitely reduces the pressure, particularly for a multi sector day. I'm much more relaxed when I arrive at work 80% prepared already and only need to deal with last minute stuff once I get to the aircraft.
I've already worked out my fuel figure, set up the JEPP app for the route and entered the aircraft registration in the performance apps. If the aircraft arrives with a new MEL which requires a complicated operational procedure or the rostered F/O calls in sick at the last minute and I need to do his job until the replacement arrives I'm not overloaded.
I've already worked out my fuel figure, set up the JEPP app for the route and entered the aircraft registration in the performance apps. If the aircraft arrives with a new MEL which requires a complicated operational procedure or the rostered F/O calls in sick at the last minute and I need to do his job until the replacement arrives I'm not overloaded.
Can someone confirm if in the JQ Preliminary Cockpit Preparation section of the eQRH SOP there is a line item of EFB/QRH check.
if it is in the JQ eQRH, then why no ATSB mention of the missed SOP in the cockpit?
If not in the JQ eQRH, then why no ATSB mention of this (as it is an unadulterated Airbus procedure). Surely having a SOP item in the cockpit is better safeguard than relying on it from memory at sign on?
if it is in the JQ eQRH, then why no ATSB mention of the missed SOP in the cockpit?
If not in the JQ eQRH, then why no ATSB mention of this (as it is an unadulterated Airbus procedure). Surely having a SOP item in the cockpit is better safeguard than relying on it from memory at sign on?
Observation: Date of incident occurrence to date of report release = 514 days and yet still has basic error in report of two different aircraft regos (-VFK and -VFX). Wonder what else is incorrect in the data on which recommendations have been made to the operator?
