Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

No new LAME positions at QF for the next 6-8 years.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

No new LAME positions at QF for the next 6-8 years.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2019, 11:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No new LAME positions at QF for the next 6-8 years.

Qantas Engineering have just announced they will be NO new LAME positions for AME,s for the next 6-8 years!!! What does that say about career advancement....or lack of. There is now very little point in AME,s spending there own time and money on training if QF is never going to recognise their hard work. It also weakens the ALAEA membership and any ongoing negotiations.

Feel free to comment.
PV
Pterois Volitans is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 00:15
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here and there....currently here.
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
No new ones even due to natural attrition (leavers, retirement etc.) having to be back filled, or no new ones even to fill those potential vacancies to keep numbers stable?
Tom Sawyer is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 01:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: australia
Posts: 61
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Are Qantas going down the same road as Cobham and others. Reducing the expensive skilled workers and replacing with contractors like Oceania and Aerocare who are responsible for all of the ground handling and push backs etc. They call it "engineering on demand"
SuPeRcHaRgEd is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 02:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Sawyer
No new ones even due to natural attrition (leavers, retirement etc.) having to be back filled, or no new ones even to fill those potential vacancies to keep numbers stable?
Replaced by Cat A licences
Maxmotor is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 06:05
  #5 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,486
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
What could possibly go wrong?
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 06:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kichin
Posts: 1,050
Received 695 Likes on 191 Posts
QF going down the same road as Cobham? because that’s been a roaring success. The 717 now has a very bad reputation as an unreliable aircraft because it was maintained “on demand” and by the lowest bidder. If QF truly go down this path, they will become a laughing stock.
gordonfvckingramsay is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 06:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,625
Received 600 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
QF going down the same road as Cobham? because that’s been a roaring success. The 717 now has a very bad reputation as an unreliable aircraft because it was maintained “on demand” and by the lowest bidder. If QF truly go down this path, they will become a laughing stock.
They all ready are .
dragon man is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2019, 07:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Under the big blue hangar
Age: 40
Posts: 240
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Just remember managers are short term contractors. I can remember one short rotund manager telling all the AMEs about 11-12 years ago that you will not get trained and you have reached the pinnacle of your career. Then he got booted and albeit a small number of AMEs were trained, but they were trained. And last year one manager with a scottish accent also said that there will be full B1 training for AMEs this year(2019). That obviously hasn't happened. It is hard to know who to believe and when to believe them. Cat A licences are the saviour, obviously.
Bootstrap1 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2019, 12:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts

This sums it up well.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2019, 23:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 40
Posts: 149
Received 20 Likes on 6 Posts
They don’t train Lames = shortage of qualified guys/girls = reason for imported workforce to ‘fill’ self made shortfall = downward pressure over wages.

Hopefully in 5 or 6 years time some politician will be able to say “why didn’t train engineers 5 or 6 years ago?” - but then that probably wouldn’t be in the national interest...
Johnny_56 is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2019, 09:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: aviation heaven, australia
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gordonfvckingramsay
QF going down the same road as Cobham? because that’s been a roaring success. The 717 now has a very bad reputation as an unreliable aircraft because it was maintained “on demand” and by the lowest bidder. If QF truly go down this path, they will become a laughing stock.
Maintenance on demand is not the problem with the B717. Its the muppets at Qlink and the CAMO. There are some really good guys at Cobham 145, as there are at QF. Qlink is NOT QF.

QF is already doing maintenance on demand. The difference you are speaking of is the LAME-less tarmac which QF still do not do. Whats funny is every time I look over and see the good old QF boys doing a push back I have a little chuckle which gets particularly louder when its raining or cold as I'm sipping my coffee in the engineering van. Probably some time this century I hope they realise that chucking chocks, placing cones and telling a pilot brakes off is not being an engineer.

100% agree that Qantas is going to have some tough years ahead, and the shortage of engineers in Oz is only going to get bigger!
empire4 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.