Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Glen Buckley and Australian small business -V- CASA

Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Glen Buckley and Australian small business -V- CASA

Old 19th Jul 2021, 04:39
  #1701 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: melbourne
Age: 56
Posts: 686
missing messages

both the text message and the contact have have gone. Will contact my provider and check if they can be retrieved, cheers
glenb is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2021, 11:14
  #1702 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: S33E151
Posts: 993
By chance, might you happen to have an old backup (time machine) drive stashed somewhere?
V-Jet is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2021, 21:40
  #1703 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: melbourne
Age: 56
Posts: 686
question to the Ombudsman

Dear Mark of the Commonwealth Ombudsmanís Office.



Thankyou for providing me your finalised response regarding my complaint regarding CASA. I apologise for the delay in responding as I have been involved in a house move. As you are aware the CASA action has left me destitute and bankrupt, as I have personally lost many millions of dollars, and as you are aware several other businesses were forced into closure. The financial and human toll that this has taken on the wellbeing of my family, and me is totally unwarranted and unneccesssary.The impact has been significant to say the least.



I feel compelled to have a response on record, and I am in the process of preparing that response.



In order to assist me in finalising the response, may I put one important question to you.



There is no doubt that since the introduction of Civil Aviation legislation in 1938, multiple flight training organisations operating under a single authorisation was fully sanctioned and approved by CASA. There is no doubt that this is the truth. This can simply be evidenced, by the Latrobe Valley Aero Club operating under the AOC of a Charter Company in Bairnsdale, up until the day they joined APTA.



When Latrobe Valley transferred from its previous operator to APTA, CASA declared APTAs operation illegal, placed trading restrictions on the business for 8 months that prevented it taking on new customers. CASA also wrote to existing customers advising them of that fact that they were operating illegally and subject to regulatory action.



Can I request an explanation as to why no consideration was made regarding this fact i.e. CASA allowed other Operators to do this but determined that I was operating unlawfully.



It would appear to me that this would be the starting point of any investigation, although you chose not to address this critical factor.



If I could request an explanation as to why no comparative analysis was made, I would be highly appreciative.



Yours thankfully,



Glen Buckley
glenb is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.