Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Malindo Magic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st October 2018 | 11:28
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 71
From: Wanaka, NZ
Originally Posted by RAC/OPS
ah yes, the final check to make sure everything’s right, double check what each other is doing and you’ll never get it wrong....
My experience as a TRI in the simulator with Indonesian and (to a lesser extent) Malaysian crews. One guy will fly it into the ground and the other guy will just sit there and not say or do anything to alter that outcome. And it doesn't matter who is driving, Captain or FO. I've seen it happen time and time again. It's totally mind boggling to see one guy crash a perfectly good aeroplane whilst his buddy is busy looking for the right page on a checklist, or otherwise doesn't give a toss about his own life or those of the passengers.

Last edited by gulliBell; 1st October 2018 at 11:49.
gulliBell is offline  
Reply
Old 1st October 2018 | 18:49
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 721
Likes: 1
From: Doomagee
5000 or 6000 is nothing compared to what pilots have to put up with flying into and out of Melbourne. Makes every other city like a fun day out.
Berealgetreal is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd October 2018 | 02:56
  #43 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 246
Likes: 7
From: The world's most liveable city
As mentioned, the MEL departures are not RWY specific and neither is the airways clearance, which may have something to do with the propensity for ATC to change runway configuration at the drop of a hat....
I think the explanation for runway changes have been covered ad nauseum in other threads however I’ll say it again here. ATC cannot nominate (or continue to use) a runway which has in excess of 20kt crosswind or 5kt tailwind - or any tailwind if the runway is not dry. These are not rules that we like but we are stuck with them until our customers pressure airservices or CASA to change them. CASA, the airlines, the insurance companies, and lawyers (and most of the experts on here) will have our arses if there is an incident where disregard of those rules could have possibly played a part.

I always specify the runway as part part of the clearance (runway 34 Keppa 1 departure) or say ‘information November, runway 34, cleared to....’ etc on clearance delivery but the vagaries of Melbourne weather, or TMA requesting LAHSO may mean that the runway will change before you push back. As an aside the ATIS may have been nominating a runway configuration for an hour or more and some pilots are still surprised that they’re not for 34 when given taxy instructions.
RAC/OPS is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd October 2018 | 14:25
  #44 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 1,304
From: Australia
Judging by the flight path displayed on the Google map. Looks like the PF ripped into a smart climbing left turn blindly chasing the FD needles within seconds of rotation. Be hilarious if it wasn't so serious..
Centaurus is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd October 2018 | 01:52
  #45 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 3
From: Sydney
Or simply engaged autopilot, without thought, after rotation.
Smells of children of the magenta line to me.
Bankstown Boy is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2018 | 01:43
  #46 (permalink)  
fdr
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,429
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Originally Posted by Centaurus
Judging by the flight path displayed on the Google map. Looks like the PF ripped into a smart climbing left turn blindly chasing the FD needles within seconds of rotation. Be hilarious if it wasn't so serious..
repaint the radome as a red nose.
fdr is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2018 | 05:41
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Asia
AirAsia did the same thing in Sydney. Switched on the AP soon as wheels off the ground and it just followed where the crew incorrectly programmed it to go. They didn’t know any wiser. Thank Christ the tower had eyes on it drifting over to 16L.

Seems to be a lack of basic knowledge around the basic operations of a circuit. Malindo turned into the downwind leg of 34, assumed all standard? AirAsia turned left over 16l with traffic on approach/rolling down the runway.
wheels_down is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2018 | 07:28
  #48 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 28
From: Country Victoria, Australia
Originally Posted by wheels_down
AirAsia did the same thing in Sydney. Switched on the AP soon as wheels off the ground and it just followed where the crew incorrectly programmed it to go. They didn’t know any wiser. Thank Christ the tower had eyes on it drifting over to 16L.


I thought their effort was even better. The IRUs were aligned on a point thousands of miles away, and they had the maps in plan mode, 'cos that was the only way they could see Sydney....
mrdeux is offline  
Reply
Old 6th October 2018 | 10:10
  #49 (permalink)  
fdr
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 4,429
From: 3rd Rock, #29B
Originally Posted by mrdeux
I thought their effort was even better. The IRUs were aligned on a point thousands of miles away, and they had the maps in plan mode, 'cos that was the only way they could see Sydney....
Mr D; my ribs are hurting from laughing, thanks.

Two "first world airlines" had fun with stuff like that. One lot decided to do an instant align at the holding point, for an aircraft with a TOGA Map updating function, which raised the eyebrows of the FO, the newbie but senior driver having just reached up above his head and cycled the IRS to do the quick align. At which time, ATC gave them an immediate TO clearance. The restrained FO started to say they couldn't accept the TO clearance, but the driver pursued the setting sun, and departed. At rotate, the driver was surprised to have no attitude, and no map. It was a nice day to float around VMC dumping 100T of dino sauce. The other guys got warnings on align, and reinserted the existing position without crosschecking. At liftoff, the map of course was set at the position of the manufacturers factory, some 7000nm away. 50T later the guys got to do it all again from the same place.

The compass/map check on entering or linei up saves some messing about.
fdr is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 03:32
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 297
From: Oz
Attention CASA.

Ban these bastards.

QZ8501 now we have JT610. Another 189 dead.

I have written once this year to you regarding this carrier and I will be writing again.

I don't want any carrier within this airline group within Australian Airspace.

Not only are they a risk to themselves, they are a risk to my crew and passengers operating within the same airspace as them.

Last edited by PoppaJo; 29th October 2018 at 04:00.
PoppaJo is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 03:49
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 2
From: Dunnunda
CASA must take action if they have any integrity, enough is enough. Peoples lives before Canberra Politics.
TULSAMI is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 03:52
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Here here. I'm not one to knee jerk but the ban should cover its subsidiaries (Malindo) and be effective immediately. They are a joke and an embarrassment. Can anyone honestly say they are surprised?
Jeps is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 05:01
  #53 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 659
Likes: 16
From: Lost, but often Indonesia
Originally Posted by PoppaJo
Attention CASA.

Ban these bastards.

QZ8501 now we have JT610. Another 189 dead.

I have written once this year to you regarding this carrier and I will be writing again.

I don't want any carrier within this airline group within Australian Airspace.

Not only are they a risk to themselves, they are a risk to my crew and passengers operating within the same airspace as them.
LionAir JT 610 crashed 6 hours ago but you already "know" it's due to pilot error. Get a grip...
Octane is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 05:46
  #54 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,401
Likes: 141
From: NSW
Two things: Many moons ago last century a charter pilot in Brisbane one evening entered ROME not ROMA in the GPS and started heading off in the wrong direction. When quired by ATC confirmed he was going to Roma...oops and he wasn't Indonesian. A Euro contact in Indonesia who owns an airline there, operating B737's, just sent me a message saying "the engine manufacturers will be checking their insurances!"...
TBM-Legend is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 06:41
  #55 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 609
Likes: 114
From: Eagles Nest
Big business trumps politics , they won’t get banned .
Toruk Macto is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 06:58
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Harbour Master Place
Originally Posted by Toruk Macto
Big business trumps is politics , they won’t get banned .
Fixed it for you.
Though a US study, it is likely to be true here as well: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens

CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 11:35
  #57 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 588
Likes: 99
From: Australia
This is from the DFAT smart traveller website. Perhaps CASA will read this and also take some action.

https://smartraveller.gov.au/Countri...indonesia.aspx

"Following the fatal crash of a Lion Air plane on 29 October 2018, Australian government officials and contractors have been instructed not to fly on Lion Air or their subsidiary airlines. This decision will be reviewed when the findings of the crash investigation are clear (see Local travel). The level of our advice has not changed. Exercise a high degree of caution in Indonesia overall, including Bali. Higher levels apply in Central Sulawesi and Papua provinces."
Cloudee is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 20:43
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
As was mentioned in another thread this outfit has a safety score comparable to QF on airlineratings.com so I am completely satisfied.
Jeps is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 21:04
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 2
From: Europe
Originally Posted by Jeps
As was mentioned in another thread this outfit has a safety score comparable to QF on airlineratings.com so I am completely satisfied.
Do they have a 'Chairman's lounge' too? /sarc
Rated De is offline  
Reply
Old 29th October 2018 | 22:58
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Western Pacific
Last August I was stuck trying to get to Bali having been booted off a flight using staff travel. Ended up going to MEL and jumped on a Malindo flight the next morning. On a 6:40 flight the seatbelt sign was on for perhaps 5:50 on a flight that was glass smooth the vast majority of the time. Having flown many years in Asia, I know this to be a sure sign (excuse the pun) of a poor commander. Basically, the mind set appears to be rather than make a decision (on/off) the default setting is to leave it on, therefore always be "covered". Whether this is due to a poor understanding of weather radar or simply an inability to stand by your own command experience I don't know. But, whatever the case, if a minor decision like that is beyond the abilites of the crew, God forbid if real, game changing decisions have to be made.

When we finally arrived in Bali (good weather, dry runway) the "landing" was so poor I honestly thought we were going to be another runway excursion statistic. Sideways, full braking, no braking, sideways the other way, full braking again, etc..... When the plane finally came to a smoking halt, my 5 year old daughter said "That was great fun daddy, just like a roller coaster". Never again.
Onesixty2four is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.