Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Gutless QANTAS

Old 5th Jun 2018, 09:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: space
Posts: 284
Angry Gutless QANTAS

https://www.news.com.au/travel/world...cf9755629e9f4d

What a gutless bunch of pricks QANTAS managment are. TAIWAN is NOT CHINA. TIBET is NOT CHINA. The disputed islands in the South China Sea are NOT CHINA.
CHINA NEEDS TO BE STOPPED NOW!
zanthrus is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 09:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 758
I bet Jetset Julie and her Canberra minions had a significant hand in Qantas' decision. Qantas was on a hiding to nothing!
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 10:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 807
Qantas doesn’t sell tickets to Tibet or the South China Sea, and most of the UN (including Australia) recognises the PRC as the legitimate government of Taiwan. Bit hard to go against that when you want to do business in China!
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 10:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 36
Alan Joyce. You gutless, feckless, fcukwit.
Strainer is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 10:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 46
Posts: 508
So as a business leader what would you do? Cut of your nose to spite your face?

Look at the list of other airlines who have already changed, have you made online attacks against them?

So if Qantas said no........ Hmmmm your Beijing and Shanghai slots have been revoked? Hong Kong? Expansion into China and south east Asia. As a business leader one needs to think long term.

So I ask what would you have done?
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 10:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 400
We don't even fly there, it's a codeshare with China Airlines
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 10:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: All over the Planet
Posts: 758
Originally Posted by Chris2303 View Post
We don't even fly there, it's a codeshare with China Airlines
Those with a long memory and corporate knowledge will know that Qantas acknowledged a "One China policy" before operating to Taipei as Australia Asia Airlines in the early 1990s. What else is new?
Ken Borough is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 10:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 1,260
AUSTRALIA is NOT CHINA...but give it a few more years...
cattletruck is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 23:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,498
Originally Posted by cattletruck View Post
AUSTRALIA is NOT CHINA...but give it a few more years...
Anyone doubting the trajectory of the 'relationship' with China that Australia sleepwalked itself in, ought get themselves a copy of Professor Clive Hamilton's book 'Silent Invasion'. This is the book dropped by two publishers, of course in no way would a 'friendly' trading partner attempt to influence anyone. That Australia has allowed Chinese influence to the level it has, pumping house prices with illicit cash has meant that this issue got little attention outside the sphere of Australia's security and intelligence organisation who unlike the various weasels at all levels of politics actually work in the national interest.

Give little Napoleon a break. He is a bully only when he is the bigger man. Was very happy to use company funds where it suited him as a social campaigner. He is a reflection of modern Australia, happy to take the money from a brutal dictatorship, as he was to ignore the dystopian elements relating to personal conduct in the UAE that he willing exposed his customers to.
Rated De is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2018, 23:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 444
Why is it QF who are being attacked on this site when the reality is most governments (including Australia’s) and most other airlines and companies who trade with China have the exact same policy? Is it just an excuse for more QF bashing for any reason that exists throughout this forum?

dr dre is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 00:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Sand dune
Posts: 180
QANTAS bashing it may be but a decade of totalitarian rule from that excuse of a CEO has created this sentiment. You’ll forgive people for having a hair trigger when it comes questionable decisions.
Blitzkrieger is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 01:05
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alaska
Posts: 149
Originally Posted by cattletruck View Post
AUSTRALIA is NOT CHINA...but give it a few more years...
too true , unfortunately !
Rabbitwear is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 01:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: oz
Posts: 27
Qantas....standing up for SSM, but not DEMOCRACY
nefarious1 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 01:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 35
Posts: 79
Blitz and Rated De 1000% spot on. Dre don’t be so sensitive. No one is having a go at hard working QF Staff. This is all about what your boss and board have decided what your company stands for and doesn’t stand for at the behest of you and the rest of your colleagues. All with what seems zero accountability. Greed is king and AJ is a complete two faced little queen scared of China. No leadership at all except when talking up profits and turn around.
Captain Biggles84 is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 02:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Best Place!
Posts: 181
Bang on Dr Dre. BA, LH,Etihad, Malaysian, Garuda, Air Canada etc are but a few who have already done what Qantas has done. And don't forget EK - they banned their Taiwanese Cabin Crew from wearing the Taiwanese flag on their uniforms.

But hey, this isn't a Qantas or AJ bash...........
mmmbop is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 03:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 396
It’s not being sensitive it’s being accurate. This is the Australian government’s stance on Taiwan from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade website:
The Australian Government continued to recognise Taipei until the establishment of diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1972. Australia’s Joint Communiqué with the PRC recognised the Government of the PRC as China’s sole legal government, and acknowledged the position of the PRC that Taiwan was a province of the PRC.

The terms of our Joint Communiqué dictate the fundamental basis of Australia’s one China policy - the Australian Government does not recognise the Republic of China (ROC) as a sovereign state and does not regard the authorities in Taiwan as having the status of a national government.
So if you have a problem with how an Australian company refers to Taiwan then you should probably direct your malice toward Julie Bishop and DFAT as it is precisely in line with the Australian government’s guidance.

Comments refering to the CEO as a “gutless, feckless, fcukwit” or “two faced little queen” over this decision are naive of the diplomatic reality, naive of the commercial and demographic reality, crude and bigoted.

Past decisions by Qantas senior management have trashed the company and caused significant damage to my own career but these attacks are unjustified.
Beer Baron is online now  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 03:16
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Japan
Posts: 623
Keep it on topic folks. Look at the thread title.

The only real question for me is with which side do you empathize, the PRC government on the mainland, or the ROC government in Taiwan?
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 04:02
  #18 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,177
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Beer Baron View Post

Past decisions by Qantas senior management have trashed the company and caused significant damage to my own career but these attacks are unjustified.
Agreed. Joyce’s lifestyle choices shouldn’t enter in the discussion.

Though when you decide to take a very public and high profile stand arguing ‘principles’ it does look a tad hypocritical when you decide to compromise them later on.
Keg is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 04:33
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 807
Homosexuality is illegal in Singapore (and UAE). Shall Qantas make a stand and stop flying there?
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2018, 04:39
  #20 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 1,928
Not sure why they could not call it Taiwan? That’s what it is called in all the airports in mainland China.

What is the true danger to navigation is the constant calls the Chinese military make on 121.5 telling aircraft to get of their airspace. That is sometimes a long way from China when you can see the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Korea, or Japan etc out the window.

They just take take take, no consideration for the rule of law most of the time.
swh is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.