Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Airbus eats Paperwork

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2018, 03:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Or a label on the inlet - No Storage Here.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2018, 08:07
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,337
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
They just need "Remove Before Flight" flags hung on them.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 28th Feb 2018, 08:31
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NZNS/YBBN
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by itsnotthatbloodyhard
Excellent news. They can put stuff in the pack inlets instead.

If it’s the same mob we use in Auckland, then they come across as more of a mature-age work experience program.

Jetstar and Aerocare, which manages ground crews in New Zealand, released a notice saying engines must not be used for the placement of any foreign objects.
On Tuesday, a Jetstar spokesman said while the incident "didn't impact the safe operation of the aircraft, we take it very seriously".
"Since this occurred we have updated our procedures which includes a specific warning about not placing items in the engine cowling and improved detail around checks and responsibilities of the aircraft dispatch process."


https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/trave...lipboard-scare
ozziekiwi is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 06:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: At work
Posts: 293
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a lot about this incident that concerns me. However if we put aside the fact that it happened, why the hell did the Captain have to do all the leg work to find out the details from various sources. Surely Jetstar has an operations centre that should have bent over backwards to investigate and inform the crew what had happened. How does it make it better to impede the Captains ability to make a sound decision but not proactively giving him/her all the details up front?
I had heard Jetstar don't have ACARS, but surely they have a bloody sat-phone? Or is it just an old HF patch?
belowMDA is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 06:58
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 52
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Jetstar definitely do have ACARS, Sat Phones only on the new A321’s and yes a very annoying HF patch.
Unfortunately it’s not uncommon to have issues trying to get through to Maintenance Watch which may have happened in this case
HOOROO is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 08:35
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,433
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
In his case they were having to converse with the Company on HF which is hard to do at the best of times. Also the real-time engine data isn’t controlled by Jetstar and has to be sourced from Qantas so takes forever.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 22:10
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,380
Received 209 Likes on 95 Posts
The pilot checklist will be amended to read:
Before Starting Engines:
*Ask ground crew to hold up their clipboards, and conduct a count of those who do not have a clipboard showing.
*If the count is Zero, proceed with engine start.
Ascend Charlie is online now  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 22:15
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by itsnotthatbloodyhard
Excellent news. They can put stuff in the pack inlets instead.
You win the internet this week.
havick is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2018, 23:52
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,936
Received 393 Likes on 208 Posts
The engine damage was caused by silica gel dessicant bags which were accidentally left inside the air intakes for the port engines. When the take off run was initiated, the gel bags were unfortunately sucked through the engines and caused major internal compressor and combustion chamber damage.

megan is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 00:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't it be easier to re-certify the engine to accept clipboard ingestion?
michigan j is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 09:55
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,878
Likes: 0
Received 246 Likes on 106 Posts
No mention of the despatch/starter who probably called clear to start two?
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 13:05
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: shoe box
Posts: 380
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
“While this incident didn’t impact the safe operation of the aircraft
Really?.....
Sue Ridgepipe is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 13:36
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Herod
Nice to see that the Captain "scrambled". I should think after landing, he probably boiled, and if he had found the culprit, that man would have been fried.
So dispatchers are trained to examine aircraft for serviceability now....
glad rag is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 15:54
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,494
Received 105 Likes on 63 Posts
Everybody involved around an aircraft should keep aircraft servicability in mind, and if something odd is noticed, they should bring it to the crew’s or push chief's attention. Over the years, I have occasionally been called out by a loader to check a hold door, or an oil/hyd leak, and I never mind checking.

The incident in this thread reminds me of the BA double cowl unlocked incident.

What ever happened to:

“Ground from flight deck, can I have your checks please?”

“Yes flight deck; all equipment removed, all hatches and holds secure. All intakes clear, beacon rotating, tug connected, chocks removed, standing by”.

?
Uplinker is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 20:34
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
So dispatchers are trained to examine aircraft for serviceability now....
Anyone who works on the ramp around operating airliners should be trained on the basics. This is the basics. When was the last time you saw anyone other than an Engineer or Pilot picking up FOD? It’s rare even with the trained folk now days. The ramp culture of times past has been diluted to the point that it’s rare to see it raise its head. Don’t worry though, you can fly to the Goldie for $98.
framer is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 20:52
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 145
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
This type of incident is the end result when you have Poorly paid/poorly trained Ground Staff!
Boe787 is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 22:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tent
Posts: 916
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Surprised passengers did not report confetti.


Surprised the pilots pressed on for a "considerable time" if they had concerns about the engine that was indicating and operating normally.


- Serious question, What is the procedure for keeping the paperwork dry for the ground crews when it is raining?
Bend alot is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 22:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dunnunda
Posts: 252
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Serious question, What is the procedure for keeping the paperwork dry for the ground crews when it is raining?
There isn't one, its common through winter to be handed 3 or 4 sheets of dripping wet paper that by this stage often resembles toilet paper.
GA Driver is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2018, 23:44
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,094
Received 479 Likes on 129 Posts
Don’t get wound up, the safety of the flight was never effected.
framer is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2018, 01:44
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,412
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Sue Ridgepipe
Really?.....
Sue, modern engines are certified to ingest much larger/harder items than a clipboard - bird ingestion tests are far more challenging.
Perhaps some small deformation of a few fan blades where they impacted the metal clip on the clipboard and some impact damage to the acoustic lining aft of the fan after the big bits got flung outward.
Now, if he'd left a large wrench in the inlet....
tdracer is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.