Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Hijack attempt on Malaysia Airlines

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Hijack attempt on Malaysia Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st May 2017, 15:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 156
Received 106 Likes on 24 Posts
MH128 Returns to Melbourne after passenger attempted to gain access to flightdeck

https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/384154
A320 Flyer is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 15:14
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hijack attempt on Malaysia Airlines

**********BREAKING NEWS***********

Suspected hijacking attempt on MH128 Melbourne Kuala Lumpur and returned shortly after departure with passenger attempting to enter cockpit claiming to have explosives.

Melbourne airport in lockdown. Some flights being diverted to Avalon. All roads are blocked off around the airport

MORE TO COME
Metro man is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 15:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: FL290
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Malaysian cant get a break. Sounds like all are safe
1a sound asleep is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 19:33
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Secret
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would you look at that... Aussie cops first thing they do ask to stop filming them. Again.

Malaysia Airlines flight grounded in Melbourne after man threatens to blow up plane
Moneymoneymoneymoney is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 22:06
  #5 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 832
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Money recurring,I suggest that your criticism be directed toward the instigator of this incident rather than the guys who have to go in and sort out his mess.

After the 2 major events of the last few years,the last thing Malaysian needs is a wannabee hijacker stirring up trouble !
TWT is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 22:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
The AFP guys are a counter terror outfit. Similar to SAS - you don't want them filmed.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 23:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,220
Received 123 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
The AFP guys are a counter terror outfit. Similar to SAS - you don't want them filmed.
You're got that wrong, Sunfish. they don't want to be filmed. They don't want any evidence of ol' mate falling down the stairs. 6 times....
KRviator is online now  
Old 31st May 2017, 23:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Filming of CT/Special Forces Pers

Even the Australian media respect the fact that CT/Special Foeces personnel are not to be filmed, or, at a minimum, their faces blurred. It is to protect the personal safety of those personnel and also so that their operational tactics are not disclosed to possible adversaries. That would be why they asked passengers to stop filming.
Minimbah is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 23:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
I was under the impression that it was get down and put your phones down because if your holding a phone up then your not getting down.
logansi is offline  
Old 31st May 2017, 23:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
From the news, quoting some footy player...
"Staff grabbed the object, which we're not sure what it was, he was claiming to blow the plane up with, and walked it back to the front of the plane."
If true where is the LRBL on that aircraft? It would surprise me if it was towards the front?
compressor stall is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 00:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't transferring passengers onto buses seperate them from any neferious contents of hand baggage and so further reduce the risk?
Decision making in a dynamic, constantly evolving environment with incomplete information, where have I heard that before?

I'm sure they did the best they could with what they had. We can always criticise & question in hindsight, with the facts available to us, and an analysis at our leisure.

Last edited by CurtainTwitcher; 1st Jun 2017 at 02:52. Reason: spelling
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 01:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Couple of updates:

Herald Sun says:

LATEST: A MAN who claimed to have a bomb on a Malaysia Airlines flight from Melbourne had been released from a psychiatric facility yesterday, police say.
And police confirm:
device onboard #MH128 was a music player about the size of a shoe
logansi is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 02:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
90min wait.

I assume these Special Forces were all called out of bed at the odd hour? Or are these guys on standby 24/7?

Bit odd considering the AFP Facility is 500m away. The media didn't buy the Chief Commissioners excuses this morning for the wait either, got nailed.
wheels_down is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 04:01
  #14 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 832
Received 34 Likes on 19 Posts
Report: Police cock-up delayed MH128 evacuation for over an hour (VIDEO) | Malaysia | Malay Mail Online

Confused communications didn't help.
TWT is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 04:19
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
The "alleged" perpetrator was bound up like a suckling pig, better point my semi automatic at him just in case.

The crew and passengers appear to have done a good job in "neutralising" the threat, hand him to the baggage handlers for special care.
Icarus2001 is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 04:54
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,072
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Not sure I would be sitting on my hands for 1.5 hours if a guy had threatened the aircraft with a bomb. Possibly they figured out he wasn't the real deal, or he conceded once he was tied up but who's going to take that risk?

Maybe someone should ask why passengers are funding the AFP if they are not there when actually needed?

Sure someone can sleep in, miss the phone etc, but just send a squad car round there and haul him out of bed and whisk him to the airport. Doesn't take 90 minutes to do that.

I'm getting the impression this is another installment of that early 21st century work called 'Security Theater'
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 04:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Not sure I really see the logic....suspected/possible explosive device on board. So keep the passengers on the aircraft with it.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 05:10
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,254
Received 195 Likes on 90 Posts
Aviation management consultant Trevor Jensen said the delay in the police response seemed to be excessive, and may have caused more stress to passengers.
Didn't Trevor go ballistic at people when he didn't get his way?
Lookleft is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 05:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by IsDon
Just how certain are you that the perpetrator was acting alone?

Until absolutely certain everyone on the aircraft is who they say they are and are not involved in the incident the threat still exists. But of course, you know better.
Yes, but why are you keeping the passengers, the supposed device, and an aircraft full of fuel, in close proximity? If the device had been real, this would seem to overwhelm any potential issue from a possible other perp.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2017, 05:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 247 Likes on 107 Posts
Your ignorant diatribe further demonstrates you have absolutely no idea.
Why the personal attack? Further demonstrates? Is there a pattern?

Just how certain are you that the perpetrator was acting alone?
I didn't mention he was acting alone. The aircraft was on the ground. Mute point.

Until absolutely certain everyone on the aircraft is who they say they are and are not involved in the incident the threat still exists.
What threat? If an accomplice had the ability to detonate another (?) device they would have done so in the air, not wait until the aircraft was parked in a remote spot on the ground. Ergo, no bomb threat, only a possible accomplice to track down.

The second line was a joke, lighten up.
Icarus2001 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.