Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Qlink Cobham 717s payload limited

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Qlink Cobham 717s payload limited

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st January 2014 | 21:12
  #41 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 112
Likes: 29
From: Queensland
Base Pay Rates

I know 0tto's question was for just the Cobham Captain base pay but I thought I'd give them all for anyone that is interested.

From the various agreements:

Cobham:
Captain
FY12/13: $155,000
FY13/14: $158,875

First Officer
FY12/13
1st year: $85,250
2nd year: $89,125
3rd year: $93,000
4th year: $93,000
5th year+: $100,750

FY13/14
1st year: $87,381
2nd year: $91,353
3rd year: $95,325
4th year: $95,325
5th year+: $103,269

Eastern (Regional Jet - Single Aisle):
FY12/13
Captain: $153,734
First Officer: $99,928
(Could not find data for FY13/14)

Sunstate (Regional Jet - Single Aisle):
FY12/13
Captain: $140,688
First Officer: $91,447
FY13/14
Captain: $144,908
First Officer: $94,190

Last edited by Check_Thrust; 1st January 2014 at 21:45. Reason: Clarification that Eastern and Sunstate rates are for single aisle regional jet aircraft
Check_Thrust is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2014 | 22:53
  #42 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 5,596
Likes: 37
From: Sydney, Australia
Talking

C'mon Rob. It's Qantas. It'll be somewhere between 0 and 3% with the flat 3 looking the likely option.
Keg is offline  
Reply
Old 1st January 2014 | 23:31
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 808
Likes: 31
From: Home
You'll be doing well to even get 3 out of them at the moment!
Going Nowhere is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 03:32
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,188
Likes: 961
From: Seat 1A
Believe...

Originally Posted by Troo Believer
tell the public. They have a right to know.


and



Does Eastern or Sunstate have "operated by" on the side of their aircraft?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 03:38
  #45 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
There is no way Ansett flew DC9s from CBR to BNE. It didn't have the range nor performance.
TAA must've had better DC9s than Ansett then because I flew in one SYD to Townsville in 1980, and they often ran MEL-BNE-MEL, both longer stage lengths than CBR-BNE.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 04:03
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,188
Likes: 961
From: Seat 1A
MEL-BNE-MEL, both longer stage lengths than CBR-BNE.
C'Mon Clarrie, sealevel ports with runways longer than 50 MCGs can't be compared to CBR 35 at 35°.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 04:07
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 2
From: Australia
I never flew the 9 but I do know that CBR was a problem especially at hot temps. Elev terrain temps etc etc.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 04:12
  #48 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
True Bloggs but the 71 isn't the only aircraft that can be payload limited ex CBR, 727, DC9 from the distant past, 737 300/400 from more recent past. If the decision is made to upgrade to C engines I'd guess the problem will possibly be no more.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 05:20
  #49 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 391
Likes: 33
From: home
" jet like speeds", sorry couldn't let that one through to the keeper.
Wondering which jet is as slow as 360kts, the max cruise speed of the Q400?
Even the 146 would happily cruise at 400, most other jets are at least 100kts quicker than the Q400

Confucius say "props belong on boats"
PPRuNeUser326772 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 06:38
  #50 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 306
Likes: 4
From: In a pipe in the upstairs water closet
And jets belong in spas...

Fuel-Off
Fuel-Off is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 06:52
  #51 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 461
Likes: 129
From: Bottom of the Harbour
Bring back the 146, i don't recall it having severe payload restrictions ex-CBR in the summer!

For all its faults it could still uplift a decent payload off short strips.
KABOY is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 07:05
  #52 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,419
Likes: 853
From: Brisvegas
I don't care if Cobham flies 717 s for Qlink but FFS put Cobham on the side of the aeroplane and tell the public.
It is on the side of the aeroplane by 1L. It is also on the boarding pass.

How does a thread about weight limits on a type end up about pilot salaries. (Rhetorical question)
Icarus2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 07:32
  #53 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
Originally Posted by Troo Believer
I don't care if Cobham flies 717 s for Qlink but FFS put Cobham on the side of the aeroplane and tell the public.
Just think of all the code-share aircraft out there that will now need multiple titles on the fuselage.

The reality is that QantasLink is a single brand set up by Qantas. It's aircraft are owned by multiple entities and operated by multiple entities, some Qantas owned and at least one, not.
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 08:12
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Asia
From memory the SIDs in Canberra only included terrain clearance in the late eighties, by which time the DC9s had retired. On hot days the Nine mostly departed on 17 with a lot of tailwind.

When the new SIDs included terrain clearance requirements the payload on departure for all aircraft dropped significantly.

I would expect that that is why the Nine operated with a higher payload than the 717?
Farm gate is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 08:17
  #55 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,381
Likes: 532
From: Somewhere
If this problem is actually true doesn't QF run afoul of IATA rules in regard to a non stop flight. You cannot advertise and charge people for a non stop RPT flight if you have to keep making tech stops enroute because it is no longer 'non stop'.
neville_nobody is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 09:13
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Japan
Ansett DC9's

I flew the 9 for Ansett in the early '80's till they were retired in '82. I cannot ever remember operating CBR-BNE in it. From memory all BNE flights ex CBR were via SYD. We operated plenty of CBR-MEL and CBR-SYD though. You have to remember back then (30 years ago) BNE was a backwater and the airport was Eagle Farm which was small and basic. There was nothing like the traffic today. I just don't think there was the demand for CBR to BNE direct; however I may be wrong.
Martin VanNostrum is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 09:17
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
From: rangaville
It's still a backwater from what I hear
Jack Ranga is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 09:51
  #58 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 3
From: dunnunda
All this palaver is probably moot in the long run. I suspect a statistical analysis at the end of 12 months will probably find a relatively small percentage of flights couldn't carry the load on the day, and an even smaller percentage made tech stops. And then when the engines are made into Cs, the refrain will be "problem, what problem".
Capt Claret is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 12:28
  #59 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 33
From: Australia
...also remember being in a TAA DC-9 TSV-SYD which also had a massive thunderstorm on arrival back in the early 80's, and we held for yonks...
Flava Saver is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd January 2014 | 12:48
  #60 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 98
Likes: 6
From: NZ
I pax'd on one of these birds last week. From where i was sitting, looked like every second seat pocket was missing/torn/half attached, unable to hold anything!! Due to short flight time, unable to use IFE.

Not just performance problems??

I dunno what the J class passengers get..
SIDS N STARS is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.