Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

MERGED: Alan's still not happy......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th May 2014, 04:44
  #3981 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 351
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
And what of the Orange Cancer, Sunfish?
OneDotLow is offline  
Old 4th May 2014, 07:10
  #3982 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Weltschmerz-By-The-Sea, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,365
Received 79 Likes on 36 Posts
I subscribe to a simpler motive. I believe that the ten or so fund managers that control a big chunk of our shares all enjoy the silent dividend of Chairman's Lounge, free F class travel etc. Since none of them are playing with their own money it becomes a simple rort to be enjoyed as long as the ride is still running.

The share price is bumping along at a natural bottom, and a case can be made that the break-up value is close to the share price, so not too much risk. No real returns either, but that can be masked by only having a small holding compared to the total fund's portfolio.

A hedge fund may be angling to make a play when the QSA is repealed, or sooner via a local proxy, but to suggest an active conspiracy including the board and executive is to suggest that the risk of discovery and punishment is too small. (It may well be since ASIC is so...useless, but the risk/reward ratio seems unlikely).

Ultimately, it is entirely possible that Qantas, like scores of airlines before it, is simply suffering at the hands of monumental ineptitude.
Australopithecus is offline  
Old 4th May 2014, 08:13
  #3983 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 57
Posts: 3,095
Received 480 Likes on 129 Posts
all intents and purposes
heh heh, it was hard for me not to make the same post Waren but I knew someone would do it for me.
Ta.
framer is offline  
Old 5th May 2014, 02:55
  #3984 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
The end result is a privately owned national flag carrier with 65% of the domestic market and perhaps 50% of the international market. Profit baby! Profit!
QF, either publicly owned or private, will never again get anywhere near 50% in int'l traffic. The only way it could happen is the creation of a massive protectionist system that neither ALP or Libs could countenance. The Greens probably would but for all the wrong reasons.

It is also unlikely that QF domestic can maintain 65%. Duopolies tend to find that profit is maximised if you go for the even split or roundabouts, witness Boeing/Airbus, Visy/Amcor, Coles/Woolies etc. 65% requires investment to maintain and the profit gained on the last 10-15% just isn't worth the cost.
1A_Please is offline  
Old 5th May 2014, 03:17
  #3985 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
I subscribe to a simpler motive. I believe that the ten or so fund managers that control a big chunk of our shares all enjoy the silent dividend of Chairman's Lounge, free F class travel etc. Since none of them are playing with their own money it becomes a simple rort to be enjoyed as long as the ride is still running.

The share price is bumping along at a natural bottom, and a case can be made that the break-up value is close to the share price, so not too much risk. No real returns either, but that can be masked by only having a small holding compared to the total fund's portfolio.

A hedge fund may be angling to make a play when the QSA is repealed, or sooner via a local proxy, but to suggest an active conspiracy including the board and executive is to suggest that the risk of discovery and punishment is too small. (It may well be since ASIC is so...useless, but the risk/reward ratio seems unlikely).

Ultimately, it is entirely possible that Qantas, like scores of airlines before it, is simply suffering at the hands of monumental ineptitude.
That is without doubt the best summation of what is really going on.

Though I do think it is more than a "possibility" Qantas is in the hands of monumental ineptitude; it is proven fact!
The The is offline  
Old 5th May 2014, 08:35
  #3986 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In 2006 Tom Horton, the American Airlines CEO, (the highest paid Airline Executive in the world at the time) stated that you "can't bank market share" and earned $20 million in two years and left and of course the rest is history(Chapter 11). The second highest paid was Geoff Dixon. One can only think that the current management team will continue to run the airline down until it is in such a state that they will be able to avoid it's employee liabilities. The problem is there will be NO airline left in Australia owned by Australians and we will rely on overseas' carriers to do the heavy lifting. Of course the current Government is so naive that they believe everything management tell them. If they bought 25% and did some due diligence on the the last 5 years they will see what the real plan is. As was uttered so many times in the US "the assets will go private the and debt will go public". In the current political vacuum of decency and honesty (Nick Xenophon excepted) do not expect anything to be done about it anytime soon.

Last edited by busdriver007; 5th May 2014 at 09:03.
busdriver007 is offline  
Old 5th May 2014, 09:15
  #3987 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Land of egos
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To quote Shakespeare ' there is something rotten in the State of Denmark' - we have seen over the last few weeks with ICAC that the Political institutions are openly flawed.
dch63 is offline  
Old 5th May 2014, 11:08
  #3988 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF A380 to DFW

Strong rumours that the A380 will be taken off HKG in September and replaced by 747. A380 to go SYD-DFW-SYD as of October 1. Can anyone confirm.

I only ask as DFW will be 380 ready as of then.

Thanks
Spey is offline  
Old 6th May 2014, 20:15
  #3989 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,630
Received 602 Likes on 172 Posts
Taking the 380 off Hong Kong won't free up enough to do Dallas. The rumour earlier this year was that the MLB/LAX/MLB would go back to the 747 to allow Dallas to go to the 380. The flight planners say it can go direct to Sydney with 100 seats blocked out.
dragon man is offline  
Old 6th May 2014, 22:15
  #3990 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 356
Received 115 Likes on 46 Posts
A380 to go SYD-DFW-SYD as of October 1. Can anyone confirm.
From November according to 2 reliable sources.......but it is only May.
C441 is offline  
Old 6th May 2014, 22:39
  #3991 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
qf go to florida?
waren9 is offline  
Old 6th May 2014, 23:25
  #3992 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
The flight planners say it can go direct to Sydney with 100 seats blocked out.
Every time they've run the figures, the A380 has higher seat mile costs on that route than the B747-400ER - it's a route that's beyond the ideal range for the A380. The only reason that they would be doing it is they perceive that the route requires an aircraft that is configured with first class.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 6th May 2014, 23:55
  #3993 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
qf go to florida?
nope, but it was rumoured not that long ago that one of the foreign jetstar offshoots had some grand designs
tgbgtgb is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 00:24
  #3994 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mostly at home
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A couple of points that are getting confusing ...

I think GB means DFW-BNE .. I wouldn't know if the seat-mile cost comparison was the case or not, but certainly on DFW-SYD (if that is what the flight planners are talking about) then the A380 would have the lower seat mile costs ... since that is a route that is not achievable by the ER.

Interesting that even on DFW-SYD that the A380 would probably still not have full fuel tanks. Not sure if 380 seats is achievable, but that looks like it might be, given that with reduced pax and cargo you could probably get another 20 t of fuel on, more than enough for the extra hour or so's flying.

N

PS .. The reason for the switch to the A380 and direct SYD (if that is what happens) would be to do with Emirates flying into DFW from the other direction. A round the world A380 service. A couple of new QF heavyweight A380s? .... (insert favourite quote from the Castle here)

Last edited by noip; 7th May 2014 at 00:50.
noip is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:01
  #3995 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: nyc
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry 380 is useless elephant

Let me say one thing for all those speculating about 380 to be used for DFW route, it is just not technically possible, this airplane is only desinged for routes less than 9 hours flying time, you can stretch it for more than 9 hours provided jet fuel is as cheap as water or reducing the load weight by 30%, then it is possible to be profitable to do so.
seektruth is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 01:22
  #3996 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it's SYD-DFW-SYD.

Additional A380 available when QF9 is re-timed in July.

Last edited by Bad Adventures; 7th May 2014 at 06:12.
Bad Adventures is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 04:38
  #3997 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,630
Received 602 Likes on 172 Posts
It to start in September six days a week.
dragon man is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 04:41
  #3998 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Unfortunately not the Orient
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 88 Likes on 32 Posts
Adjustments will be made to the mix of A380s and B747s flying on the Sydney to Hong Kong route in order to facilitate the upgrade to Dallas services.
What is the plan here. A380 to continue to HK? Or will the change of fleet mix mean the A380 is no longer in it?


Sydney-Dallas-Sydney. No more Brisbane.

Last edited by SandyPalms; 7th May 2014 at 05:23.
SandyPalms is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 05:23
  #3999 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SYD-DXB-SYD on A380 (missing from above)
Qantas customers to experience world-class A380 services to Dallas/Fort Worth
Adds 10% to number of seats and First cabins

QF9/10 A380 retimings
QF9 MEL-DXB 2255-0705+1. Arrive LHR 1340.
QF10 LHR-DXB 1330-2325. Arrive MEL 2055+1.

Provides a lot more EK connections in DXB than the current timing - only 4 connections in under 4 hours... Now you get the whole of the morning cycle.
Customers travelling from Melbourne to Europe will have access to 17 round-trip connections within four hours of landing, compared with 4 under the current timings. Round trip connections for Melbourne customers are:
Athens Hamburg Prague
Copenhagen Milan Rome
Dusseldorf Moscow St Petersburg
Frankfurt Munich Venice
Geneva Nice Vienna
Paris Zurich
moa999 is offline  
Old 7th May 2014, 05:44
  #4000 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,630
Received 602 Likes on 172 Posts
Rumour mill running hot today. 767 and 747 Captains to be offered VR package of one years pay.
dragon man is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.