Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

A319s for Qlink?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2012, 01:30
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would not want to be leaving Qlink just yet that's for sure. Just incase.
This is what I was told before I started, during my employment there, and when I resigned. For various reasons - jets, mainline integration, integration even between sunnies/ eaa, commands, etc, etc. In my 4 years there none of the above happened, and I know these things have been hot topics for many more years than I was there. I left, best thing I ever did, just wish I had done it earlier.

I sincerely hope the long serving,loyal and generally top crew on the tprops do get a chance at jets, however history would suggest otherwise. Just promise you won't hold your breath waiting or you will do yourself an injury. Personally I believe the grass is much greener elsewhere.

RENURRP, is the person in the distance with something that looks like an icecream walking out of the Coogee Bay Hotel
Confirmed: Poo in ice-cream - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Last edited by grrowler; 24th Nov 2012 at 01:43.
grrowler is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 04:24
  #62 (permalink)  
Keg

Nunc est bibendum
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 5,583
Received 11 Likes on 2 Posts
Question

The interesting part here is that Ben may be getting his info from some sources who have sourced it from PPRUNE. Then he writes about it and PPRUNE lights up because Ben's said that the link is getting the A319. A self propagating and fulfilling rumour?
Keg is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 05:55
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ben is at it again.

But that could change if the signs that Qantaslink is moving to add a new jet to its lineup in addition to Boeing 717s materialises in the form of A319s, or the A319 NEOs
Airbus A319 with sharklets makes a timely first flight | Plane Talking
dr_doLiTTle is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 07:05
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Die Suddetenland
Posts: 165
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Apart from the fact that the A319 is a longer range variant of the A320.

Why not just get 320's? Where are QLink gonna go with 3700nm range and a smaller aeroplane??

PS If they DO get jets - the C-Series would make sense.

Last edited by Oriana; 24th Nov 2012 at 07:11.
Oriana is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 07:42
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2011!
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly its looking more and more likely that Qantas or Qantaslink will be getting the A319's

With Qantas's massive order for Airbus's and the cancellation of the 'asia' plans Qantas has got to put those aircraft to good use!

Jetstar cant swallow that growth... Got to end up somewhere!

Last edited by Skystar320; 24th Nov 2012 at 07:45.
Skystar320 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 07:58
  #66 (permalink)  
BPA
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The range of the A319 is perfect for FIFO ops from the East Coast to Northern WA.
BPA is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 19:57
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Age: 58
Posts: 268
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Would not max sense for them to be new given the large number of cheap secondhand ones on the market.
markis10 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 22:10
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: home
Posts: 516
Received 21 Likes on 9 Posts
The range of the A319 is perfect for FIFO ops from the East Coast to Northern WA.
Last time I flew one, the 320 could do east coast to west too.
airdualbleedfault is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 22:36
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Amongst the weeds and the dust
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...but not return, without having to take on significant fuel at a mine site...
gutso-blundo is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 22:42
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,433
Received 207 Likes on 69 Posts
Fact of the matter is that Qantas put in a massive order for A320's recently, these were all convertible to A321's and A319's. A good proportion of them were earmarked to go to the premium carrier that Qantas at the time was going to set up in Asia. Now that venture is dead in the water, Jetstar has already got the number of new aircraft on order that are required for the expansion plans.

Qantas may as well deploy the remainder in Australia. Talk of the C-series being a better fit is largely irrelevant due to the orders already being placed. The A319 is a top machine and perfect for domestic ops. Easyjet up until 2 - 3 years ago only had the A319 as the A320 didn't make commercial sense.

Why not deploy them to Qantaslink, they can be sold to the airline as the shiny new jet for the crew to gain experience in return for accepting a contract below Qantas mainline and even possibly below the Jetstar EBA. The pilot group will accept it as we come over all 'giddy' when offered a new type on the licence, long term thinking doesn't come into it. Before we know it we will have a new 'bottom' level for Jet pilots in Australia and Qantas can continue to re-build its domestic premium network at a much lower cost base.
Ollie Onion is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 03:15
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: vegas, not 'las', or 'bris', but the other one
Posts: 112
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Anyone who believes that airlines will make a commercial decision of this kind with any regard to what the pilots think or want is delusional.

Last edited by mince; 25th Nov 2012 at 03:17.
mince is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 05:47
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: under a rock
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone who believes that airlines will make a commercial decision of this kind with any regard to what the pilots think or want is delusional.
What about ex-pilot's thinking? aka J.G.

Virgin Tiger just announced their A320s will operate between Sydney and Coffs Harbour to take on the 'link. Shoeless passengers of Coffs Harbour rejoice!
bubble.head is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 06:25
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever I can log on.
Posts: 1,872
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Anyone who believes that airlines will make a commercial decision of this kind with any regard to what the pilots think or want is delusional.
I suspect that you have mis-read the posts on this thread. Pilots know that they are not in a position to make decisions about aircraft acquisitions, they are merely speculating about what decisions management will make and WHY!

Commercial decisions are never straight-forward and are influenced by many factors such as politics and "loss of face". Selection of the A319 over the C series may look good in the short term but would look poor as fuel prices increase over the service life of the aircraft.
Going Boeing is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 08:32
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: here
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also the future of the C series is nowhere near being assured yet, and delivery times are some considerable distance away. Very few local operators are going to invest in what may turn out to be an orphan, or at the very least, the Fokker of its day.
old rope is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 09:40
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: vegas, not 'las', or 'bris', but the other one
Posts: 112
Received 17 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Going Boeing
I suspect that you have mis-read the posts on this thread. Pilots know that they are not in a position to make decisions about aircraft acquisitions, they are merely speculating about what decisions management will make and WHY!
What I am saying is pilots will never have any influence on the decisions management take eg "if we get some jets at least the pilots will be happy" type of thinking doesn't exist.

Management view pilots in the same way as FUEL.
A somewhat costly and obstructive yet absolutely necessary expense.

Last edited by mince; 25th Nov 2012 at 09:42.
mince is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 10:10
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
They do think, however, "If we get jets and let the QANTASLINK guys fly them under their existing EA they'll jump at the chance to get their hands on a jet and they'll willingly undercut their colleagues in Mainline by 30-40% allowing us to set a new low benchmark in narrow body pilot salaries in Australia further destroying QANTAS' legacy conditions and improving our own KPIs and bonuses.

We'll rename QANTASLINK to plain old QANTAS, remove mainline flights from trunk routes, including the golden triangle, citing increased competitive pressures from Virgin, Jetstar and Tiger. We'll stick business class seats in the aeroplanes and our plan to decimate the terms and conditions of QANTAS pilots will be complete.".

Management know pilots want jet commands and many will sell their own grandmother to get one. I guarantee that will influence the decisions management take.

Or am I being too cynical?

Last edited by DirectAnywhere; 25th Nov 2012 at 10:17.
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 10:17
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What rates does Skywest (given the Virgin takeover) pay on its single A320, and how does that compare to Qantas or QantasLink.
Because that will be the competition for the FIFO jobs.
moa999 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 10:17
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Perff
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
colleagues in Mainline
that's a pretty loose term...
bagchucka is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 10:19
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Back in Oz
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DA, No, but your being something else that starts with a "c".

Last edited by 32megapixels; 25th Nov 2012 at 10:20.
32megapixels is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2012, 10:38
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eagles Nest
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's a first " colleagues in mainline " 20 years and its the first time to hear that .
Toruk Macto is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.