Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

VA Short/Medium haul EBA voted down

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

VA Short/Medium haul EBA voted down

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Sep 2012, 05:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aust
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VA Short/Medium haul EBA voted down

Today the EBA votes were released. 63% NO. Great result which sends a message to the company that we won't be railroaded into a half arsed agreement.
Bugsmasha is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 05:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: new zealand
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damn right! If they thought they were gonna get away with a S%*t contract like that.... Not even a gold bar at sign on or a bag of silver for meal allowances...
spinoutofcontrol is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 05:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Listen Spin, some of us have been flying long before you knew the meaning of sarcasm. If you bothered to read the contract you wouldn't start with the silly comments. I see you are from NZ, Im guessing you're still there and hence the attitude. I don't mean to be blunt but many issues still haven't been resolved in this contract and hence it got voted, or should I say shot, down.
headwires is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 05:56
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: new zealand
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Head wires.. crossed I think. Don't worry your mama read me every last word of that EBA. Wasn't bad... the contact either. Lets just hope the boys back in NZ have the cahunas to throw theirs back. The kiwi contact was just missing the centre cardboard roll... ahhh bless my little cottonsofts.
spinoutofcontrol is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 05:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Your Grandma's house
Age: 40
Posts: 1,387
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
Nice work guys and girls.

Last edited by j3pipercub; 17th Sep 2012 at 06:00.
j3pipercub is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 06:02
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Listen Spin, learn how to spell contract and then you might know what one is when you get the chance to sign it

Good luck with the kiwi thing.

So boys and girls, where to from here?
headwires is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 06:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the biggest things to come out of this is the AFAP endorsing (yes they recommended a yes vote) a company document that the pilot body rejected!
Alarm bells should be ringing to the AFAP members.

The facts of the results don't lie! and the facts indisputably say that the AFAP is NOT in tune with the pilot body.
PammyAnderson is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 06:26
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: there
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
One of the big problems has been that with the last EBA whenever there were clauses that could be open to creative interpretation the company always managed to twist them to their advantage even when clearly the spirit of the clause wasn't being adhered to. Without knowing the company's operational plans for the life of the new agreement ( re: bases, A/C types and fleet numbers, new routes, distribution of flying etc) there was just too much that could be open to such interpretation. However it seems that generally the reasons for voting no were many and varied (money, forced leave provisions etc. etc.) I am guessing that most of the Ejet fleet would have been for it but the bulk of the 73 and 330 guys would have been no. Let's wait for the final final final final offer!
slice is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 06:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is irrelevant whether the Feds are in touch with their members or not. Clearly they did a deal with the Company to endorse the document. Just seems that in their haste to ingratiate themselves with the Company they forgot to create the illusion that they weren't expecting what the document contained.

In my view they clearly had prior info on the late inserts to the doc, probably because they had suggested them in a futile (or maybe not) attempt to attract more F/O members. Unfortunately such an ill thought out tactic has probably cost them a shed load of members in Long Haul, and given existing members pause to think what the hell they are up to.

Whether you like VIPA or not, it is for this exact reason that it was started and if they do nothing else, at least they have exposed the Feds yet again for being driven by self interest rather than the interest of the Virgin pilots.
6100 is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 06:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Eastside
Posts: 636
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well either way, this will be an opportunity (critical I would say) for the two unions to actually work together. The feds can prove they listen to their members before the company, and vipa can prove they are more than hot air.

I live in hope, although history has me concerned...
grrowler is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 09:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Darwin
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Then the union has failed to properly sell the benefits of the deal. It is up to them to sell it if they have recommended it and answer any issues honestly.
What The is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 10:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Home at Last!!
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Zippa bombarding their members every day for a week with texts saying vote no is not going to be liked by FWA
Home Brew is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2012, 22:42
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
What was the Ejet pay offer Dragon? About $180,000 to operate a 100 seater by the end of the agreement. Not sure of any other operator that pays that much.
Yep the one thing you don't want to do is give management an incentive to look elsewhere for labour. With no scope there is no reason why they can't just start farming out flying to Alliance and/or Skywest.

Remember as far as ticketing goes a QF ticket = Qantaslink/National Jet/JetConnect/Mainline.

Last edited by neville_nobody; 17th Sep 2012 at 22:45.
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 02:36
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: eca
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It amazes me that you morons need to come on here and sprout about the problems of the eba when we have our own private forum within in which we have constructive discussion......

There is no need to throw your toys in public like 14 year old school girls
campdoag is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 03:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Somewhere on the Australian Coast
Posts: 1,091
Received 164 Likes on 36 Posts
No, don't stop! Please keep coming on here and throwing your toys in public.

It makes a nice change for us QANTAS guys to see we're not the only ones!
DirectAnywhere is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 05:48
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alabama, then Wyoming, then Idaho and now staying with Kharon on Styx houseboat
Age: 61
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Naughty naughty VA. Imagine that, trying to shaft the pilots on their salaries! Where is the fun in that? That lacks flair don't you think?
gobbledock is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 08:17
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gobble, it wasn't about the salaries.
S70IP is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 08:45
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it is great to see the democratic process at work.

It will be interesting to see how many pilots have the stones to follow through with what comes next........

If history teaches us anything, pilots are generally self centered and lack conviction when the metal meets the meat. I guess we will see.

As far as AIPA/VIPA, I didn't know VA Pilots were Qantas Mainline / International Pilots.
Shed Dog Tosser is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 21:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 11 Posts
It will be interesting to see how many pilots have the stones to follow through with what comes next........
I think there are quite a few red ties floating about if needed.
The The is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2012, 23:00
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cairns
Age: 50
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhh, there it is, the modern managers achilles heel, the red tie.
Josh Cox is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.