Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Nick Xenophon - The most important person in the future of Australian Aviation

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Nick Xenophon - The most important person in the future of Australian Aviation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Sep 2010, 05:28
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know what you are saying. However with proper management, this wont happen. likewise, even with datal seniority, due process can easily be circumvented by a dysfunctional managment. I've seen it all before..

The fact that DS brings an artificial barrier to employment choices means that our T&Cs are degraded should be sufficient reason to move to a promotion by merit system.

Further, it is an inherant contadiction to say on one hand, all applicants must pass a certain standard, however, Mates Of The Boss some how avoid that standard. Either a standard exists and is universally applied, or it does not.

And no, it is more detrimental to safety that management cannot , by reasons of DS, select the best people for the job of Command. DS does nothing but support the perpetuation of mediocrity.

Last edited by Anthill; 21st Sep 2010 at 05:47.
Anthill is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 06:38
  #102 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funily or not funily enough just about every pilot thats been involved in a hull loss must have passed a check within the last 6 months. Unless they were operating illegally of course.

So if you pass the checks does this mean that you'll never have an accident. All you need is the icence and away you go.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 06:39
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most Scbas not like seniority as they think they are better than the person who has done the hard yards in a company and earned their turn to Qualify for a Command.
newsensation is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 06:41
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about promotion by Merit to the people who have done the "Hard Yards" in the industry??
Anthill is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 06:50
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: earth
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should change your name to WhiteAnt!
newsensation is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 07:39
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typical.

If you cannot employ rational debate, resort to name calling. Evidently you possess neither the intellect or substance of argument for reasoned debate.

NEXT!
Anthill is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 08:23
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
Interestingly enough, it is the companies that are against seniority whilst the pilots fight for it. Unfortunately, this little detour in the topic has the potential to derail it. Seniority is worthy of its own topic but it is not important enough to ruin this one.
Kelly Slater is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 08:49
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 269
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I've been around for a long time and haven't seen much evidence that datal seniority causes a greater occurrence low standard F/Os being promoted to Captain. Achieving and maintaining high standards is required to make and hold a command under seniority systems regardless of time served. Of course I can't vouch for every company out there but the ones I've worked for have professional and fair check and training systems in place. It is often the highly motivated or selfish types who try to corrupt C & T from both outside and inside the system. As we have learned from CRM and experience, raw ability is not the only determinate for good pilots whether in the left or right seats. I've seen more evidence of people being promoted above their experience or ability when the seniority system is ignored. Relying on management to choose candidates for promotion 'on merit' is the real naivety in our present aviation climate. Seniority tends to iron out the manipulative moves of the over ambitious or compliant command applicants. The time spent in the co-pilot seat while waiting for your number to come up is invaluable. It not only allows knowledge to build but gives time for weaknesses to appear. Experience, training and high standards make for competent air crew. Seeing a Captain 'struggle' in a particular situation can't simply be sheeted home to datal seniority. (Back to CRM school quickly if you think that!)
However there will always be a problem with changing jobs under a seniority system. A fact of life. Good reason to plan for the long term in choosing your employer. Gaining quick endorsements and promotion by taking low paid positions or with shonky operators (or both) is often a recipe for long term grief. A 'quick command now' may not make for a full career no matter how 'gifted' a pilot may be.
flyingfox is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 09:58
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alabama, then Wyoming, then Idaho and now staying with Kharon on Styx houseboat
Age: 61
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ever since large government departments and businesses bought in Human Resources specialists, the focus is on the Head of HR to make their budget.
Doing this, they screw the very last cent out of negotiation so they can achieve their bonus or meet their "KPI".
I have sat around too many meetings listening to HR managers say they are happy with current "levels" of safety, "why do you need more resources?"
Spot on Jim Irwin. HR is becoming the modern day safety scourge. Most are a bunch of spreadsheet thriving twats who have no concept about what safety actualy means, nor do they fathom or understand 'risk'. I worked for one large carrier that was very cyclic with its safety department.When incident rates went down the department was culled to the bare bone. Naturally there was then less safety oversight,safety promotion and less predictive safety work taking place. Surprise surprise, incidents would escalate until the holes in the cheese started to realign themselves, the airline would panick and the number of safety staff bumped up again, and so the cycle continues.
The reason ? Accountant CEO's and HR jerks with no concept of reality.

Gobbledock is right, Safety Managers are petrified of revealing the true picture of what is happening, they consequently underate events, so that thier "KPI" is not busted
I should know. I used to sit in on weekly safety meetings and cringe as I listened to all and sundry water down the facts, fudge the figures and perform all manner of comical acts to ensure the CEO didn't find out the truth ! For those who disbelieve me then you are living in some sort of Hollywood fantasy dream.

I'm with Mr.Hat, I pray that I will be out of this industry sipping on a coldie on Stradbroke Island fishing among the breakers when the report comes over the radio that the the holes have lined up, Professor Reason is correct again and a smoking hole is all that remains of a once recognisable aircraft full of passengers.
I don't want this to happen, but the block of cheese is growing.
gobbledock is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 10:02
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: asia
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sure Anthill, get rid of datal seniority and get the cock$ucker$ in the LH seat instead. That's the sort of people that populate JQ management, mostly former AN management, taking care of the buddies, one even the 'empty suit/mirror man' in Melbourne trying to get out of his SQ contract so that he can come back and take a DEC at JQ!! That's what will happen.

Datal seniority means no more than being given a chance in order of seniority based on date of joining. The standard must still be attained/maintained.
relax737 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 11:09
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gold coast QLD australia
Age: 86
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The more I read, the more mortified I become. Us old blokes thought we were passing on a solid, safe system that was engineered over the years, for you young blokes, instead it is being torn down. If ever there was a reason for you blokes to unite under one banner it is now, if you don't, I can see it will take a hull loss to bring it before the public, and that is one hull loss too many. Very sad for us ol fellas who took such pride in our job, our aircraft, our safety records, the way of the world I guess.
teresa green is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 11:26
  #112 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back to the top.

Hi guys the thread is about Nick Xenophon and what his actions might do for the industry. Lets try and not get it locked! Understand cadets/seniority debate but lets focus on improving our industry.

This is the time - its now or never. Time for some unity. That includes engineers ATC etc.
Mr. Hat is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 11:29
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alabama, then Wyoming, then Idaho and now staying with Kharon on Styx houseboat
Age: 61
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't worry TG, just the lads letting off some steam and a bit of pent up testosterone, it happens.
The real villains are the CEO's and/or senior managers in today's aviation environment. The good ol days when people like Reg Ansett worked and breathed the business and was hands on are gone. (please do not turn this thread into an Ansett bashing, I am using Reg as an example, and yes, I know he wasn't perfect).

Today's CEO has limited vision that sits within a small field - $$$$.
They don't understand what constitutes real risk, they are experts at reactive management only, they don't listen to the experts within their organisation, rather they prefer to listen to their bank accounts creak and groan under sufficient weight, they are happy to attain to minimum safety benchmarks and pissweak entry control standards rather than strive to achieve a higher level of safety with higher benchmarks and goals.

I guess the upside to all this is that in this modern day and age responsibility can be delegated, but not accountability. So if a large aicraft does pancake itself eventually with loss of life I will look forward to seeing the look on the accountable CEO's face as he stares down the barrell of a jail sentence !
gobbledock is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 19:00
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Godzone
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today's CEO has limited vision that sits within a small field - $$$$.
They don't understand what constitutes real risk, they are experts at reactive management only, they don't listen to the experts within their organisation, rather they prefer to listen to their bank accounts creak and groan under sufficient weight, they are happy to attain to minimum safety benchmarks and pissweak entry control standards rather than strive to achieve a higher level of safety with higher benchmarks and goals.

I guess the upside to all this is that in this modern day and age responsibility can be delegated, but not accountability. So if a large aicraft does pancake itself eventually with loss of life I will look forward to seeing the look on the accountable CEO's face as he stares down the barrell of a jail sentence !
Hmmmm. I think you will find that he will pass on the jail sentences to those below him. Like the Chief Pilot, Head of Training etc........

("But, your worship, I employ all these "Professionals" to screw up & carry the can for me".)
Oxidant is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2010, 23:34
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you Flying fox for a lucid post.

I think that the issue of datal seniority is relevant here for 2 reasons:

1) It is a widely embraced promotional system which often prevents the most suitable candidates for being selected (which means that safety is not optimised-Senator Xenaphon should know about this) and

2) DS forms a de-facto regulatory barrier to the movement of labour and thus has the net effect of keeping our salaries lower.

The time spent in the co-pilot seat while waiting for your number to come up is invaluable. It not only allows knowledge to build but gives time for weaknesses to appear. Experience, training and high standards make for competent air crew.
Yes. For these reasons, people who are dataly by-passed should have no issues when promotion-by-merit upgrades people with superior experience levels who started with a company more recently.

It is better for pilots with lower levels of experience to spend more time doing their apprentiship (here we seem to agree) rather than rush into the Left Seat whisttheir aeronautical skills and knowledge remain undeveloped.
Anthill is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2010, 03:16
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shivering in the cold dark shadow of my own magnificence.
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Datal Seniority not only lowers the standard of our industry (here we are unique) but also serves to erode our Terms & Condidtions.
You should also mention that it causes earthquakes, cyclones and is linked to the depletion of some fish stocks.
psycho joe is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2010, 04:14
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your highly reasoned input Psychojoe. It is invaluable. I might suggest that further debate on this issue is best left to the Grown-ups.

Run along and play, now.
Anthill is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2010, 11:53
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Outofoz
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Anthill, please list the promotion by merit criteria?
hotnhigh is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2010, 22:15
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anthill,
I'd say the wearing of a blue shirt in a previous life would be high on the list of required criteria!
blow.n.gasket is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2010, 15:50
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anthill diverts the flow


good job - it was really good to see how easy it is to invoke a a distraction so that the thread becomes a "blue shirt" argument
I just wish the fish would bite so well when I'm out on the boat!!!!
scrubba is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.