Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Merged: PNG CAA Air Safety: ABC Foreign Correspondent

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Merged: PNG CAA Air Safety: ABC Foreign Correspondent

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Aug 2009, 15:41
  #101 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This would be a very big ask of the most sophisticated and advanced aviation regulatory and training systems in the world.
I would bet folding money if the UK CAA, US FAA, NZ CAA or CASA got involved with 'regulating' PNG aviation matters the place would grind to a halt in a week.

PNG operators have always self regulated - I would argue for the most part quite well. Certainly PNG DCA needs to be funded better than it is and staffed with people that KNOW PNG operations backwards - including the loop holes. I would be pleased to be proved wrong but I don't see that ever happening.

I would be surprised if PNG DCA has much more than 30% of the qualified staff it needs to be truly considered a 'functioning' department by international standards. I would be similarly surprised if it gets more than 30% of the funding it requires to be so considered.

As for national aviation infrastructure budgets - 10% might not be a bad guess

Amazing when you think how dependent on aviation PNG is. Not least the fact that Kokoda Trail tourism has boomed in recent years and will undoubtedly be damaged by recent events.

Last edited by Chimbu chuckles; 15th Aug 2009 at 18:21.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2009, 04:06
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Alice Springs
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said Chuck!

Too many people, including regulators seem to think that aviation only consists of Boeings flying to capital cities.
There is much more to it than that, and regulators and their rules and activities tend often to inhibit services to places where infrastructure may not be so available and loadings are low. But these services can be essential to people doing essential work.
Certainly we have to have rules, but we should not have "Boeing rules" everywhere.
bushy is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2009, 11:32
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 71
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
PNG isn't Australia and won't nbe in our lifetimes

By Aussie standards the situation in PNG is less than perfect... but I think you'll find that given the number of flights, the terrain and the weather, the aviation scene in PNG is pretty damn safe. The main reasons Aust has such a safe record in flying are the benign weather and the relatively flat nature of the continent.

But good on Foreign Correspondent for making the Aussies sit up and take notice, it might mean some aid heads their way to help pay for protecting precious Aussie lives. Within PNG itself I think you'll find that the population at large is quite happy with the safety record of aviation across the country.
nojwod is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2009, 14:09
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GC Paradise
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
This would be a very big ask of the most sophisticated and advanced aviation regulatory and training systems in the world.
I would bet folding money if the UK CAA, US FAA, NZ CAA or CASA got involved with 'regulating' PNG aviation matters the place would grind to a halt in a week.

PNG operators have always self regulated - I would argue for the most part quite well.
I think that Chimbu has pointed out the essence of the success of PNG aviation in that it is largely self-regulated. The PNG aviation environment is very hostile and extremely unforgiving of any misjudgment either from pilots or other aviation operators. So as in Darwinian gene pool theory, you make a mistake then that's all...Those that have the skill-sets are able to survive and make a go of it. Commonsense interlaced with lots of PNG experience is the only criteria that has proved to date to be a viable way to operate.

I would think that it would be nigh on impossible to write a comprehensive set of regulatory notes to cover all the nuances of aviation operations in PNG. And if it were possible, squadrons of lawyers still would not be able to understand and clarify those regulations let alone explain them to the operators so that effective operations could still be enabled.
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2014, 04:07
  #105 (permalink)  
Man Bilong Balus long PNG
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Looking forward to returning to Japan soon but in the meantime continuing the never ending search for a bad bottle of Red!
Age: 69
Posts: 2,976
Received 104 Likes on 59 Posts
Don't know if this thread really needs resurrecting but thought I'd do so anyway.

Anyone have any information on whether things have changed much in PNG since the previous post on this thread? And if any changes have been for the better?
Pinky the pilot is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 07:43
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: S37.54 E145.11
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sid O'Toole

Pruners:

As some of you may recall, Sid O'Toole was the air accident investigator who "blew the whistle" in 2008 on ABC Foreign Correspondent regarding PNG's poor air safety record and the CAA's alleged lack of an effective air safety approach.

Unfortunately, Sid has been battling cancer for some time and I am now sad to report that his condition has worsened considerably and he has now been hospitalised. The prognosis for recovery is not good.

For the information of all, Sid was a commercial pilot who became a Flight Service Officer with the then Department of Civil Aviation in 1973 and served at a number of FS Centres/Units throughout the QLD region before transferring to the then Bureau of Air Safety Investigation. Following BASI Sid transferred to the Air Safety Investigation Branch in PNG's CAA and ended up as the only investigator inside the ASI before his retirement. Without regard to the potential impact on his career with ASI, Sid was very vocal in criticising the CAA's apparent lack of action in investigating some of the major airline crashes in PNG and, therefore, raising awareness within the aviation community to this aspect.

I will report Sid's ongoing status but ask you all to think of him at this difficult time and to thank him for having the guts to speak out when he saw the need. Hopefully his efforts will not be in vain, and we all now must accept the challenge of continuing the fight for safety improvement in PNG on Sid's behalf.

Last edited by QSK?; 25th May 2014 at 22:49.
QSK? is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 07:59
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 684
Received 81 Likes on 25 Posts
QSK...

I hear you, and thanks for the update on Sid.

Please QRW him that we're thinking of him and wish him well.
SIUYA is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 11:13
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Downunda
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is very sad news about Sid. He is one of a kind in PNG, a smart man, mighty fine investigator, and not afraid to call bulls#it when a crooked government and a crooked governments departments try to hide, massage or deflect the truth. Sid also worked at times with another like minded person, Alan Stray. The two of them enhanced PNG's investigative capability.

Best wishes and kind thoughts to Sid, his family, friends and followers.
004wercras is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 03:05
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Aus
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hear casa png failed its recent icao audit...so no, unfortunately, not much has changed.

We need more 'Sid's' and Alan's.

Thoughts with him and his.
Unusual-Attitude is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2014, 23:28
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: S37.54 E145.11
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am sorry to advise those who knew Sid O Toole that he passed away last Friday evening.

As soon as I receive advice on Sid's funeral arrangements, I will post on this site.

A pilot, FSO and air accident investigator, Sid was one who cared deeply about aviation safety and was always proactive in ensuring safety was foremost in everyone's minds.

Fly high and swiftly, wantok - your contribution won't be forgotten.
QSK? is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 09:07
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The AUK
Age: 80
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would bet folding money if the UK CAA, US FAA, NZ CAA or CASA got involved with 'regulating' PNG aviation matters the place would grind to a halt in a week.
Take a look at the PNG Rules created around the year 2000 and subsequently up to the present time, and compare them against the NZCAA Rules. I think that you will find a striking similarity, and likewise for the common Rules adopted by the countries who have previously signed up to PASO.

There seems to be little or no evidence of grinding to a halt in PNG?

Regards to ya all,

The Big E - One time Engine and Airframe Dual Category LAME on DC3, F27, F28, B707, and DHC-7 at PX Lae and POM. We knew how to do it safely then, and still have the required competency.
The Big E is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 09:24
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Paradise
Age: 68
Posts: 1,552
Received 52 Likes on 20 Posts
Take a look at the PNG Rules created around the year 2000 and subsequently up to the present time, and compare them against the NZCAA Rules. I think that you will find a striking similarity, and likewise for the common Rules adopted by the countries who have previously signed up to PASO
There is nothing sinister about this Big E; a number of countries adopted the NZ rules (a great pity Australia has not done the same), all done above board.

Likewise it is not the rules themselves that are a problem; it is the application of the rules, and more particularly the lack of effective oversight that results in problems. This is reflected in the USOAP audits. This is not a failure of the people employed in CASA PNG, but a failure by the PNG government to devote sufficient resources to the cause.

It's a bit like giving up smoking - for any "quit" program to be effective, you have to want to change.
chimbu warrior is online now  
Old 5th Jun 2014, 22:18
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,197
Received 168 Likes on 106 Posts
There is nothing wrong with the PNG Rules - in fact most are quite appropriate for the country. A few are not - such as Part 139. PNG simply cannot bring the majority of its aerodromes up to ICAO standards and to expect it to is unrealistic.
As for sufficient competent staff to conduct much needed surveillance of operators, the terms and conditions on offer at CASAPNG don't come close.
When their salaries and fly in fly out arrangements approach those on offer with the local operators, they will attract the right people.
Meantime operators get away with murder - sometimes quite literally.
Mach E Avelli is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.