NAT JET 717 mishap
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: bush
Age: 48
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
here is a link to some pics of what happens when u plant a B767 on it nose wheel after a bounce, 11G http://www.yulaviation.com/vbb/showt...p?t=8210bugger
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: No Fixed Abode
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe the time to take it seriously Hoof, is when the investigators have finished their job and some facts are known, rather than based on the speculation of the voyeurs of PPRuNe.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re the footage linked to by Capn Bloggs of the 146 having a heavy landing:
The footage is real and is of a Crossair RJ100 landing on runway 28 at London City.
A whole thread, including photos of the damage and press reports covering the repair effort, can be found here:
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=289698
The aircraft was badly damaged but was repaired and flown out about 4 months later.
The footage is real and is of a Crossair RJ100 landing on runway 28 at London City.
A whole thread, including photos of the damage and press reports covering the repair effort, can be found here:
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=289698
The aircraft was badly damaged but was repaired and flown out about 4 months later.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
APMR,
That is not the aircraft in the video, the one in the video while looking extreme seems to have got out of it without damage. The one that was damaged had the Star Alliance livery, not Swiss (as on that video).
I think BA have damaged more aircraft at LCY than any other operator, all 146/RJ aircraft.
That is not the aircraft in the video, the one in the video while looking extreme seems to have got out of it without damage. The one that was damaged had the Star Alliance livery, not Swiss (as on that video).
I think BA have damaged more aircraft at LCY than any other operator, all 146/RJ aircraft.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Zeke,
My mistake. Perhaps the heavy landings at London City involving 146-like aircraft are a lot more common than I thought.
I did read something somewhere about a Crossair 146-like aircraft having one at that airport, and the video may well be of that incident. I will try to find that info.
My mistake. Perhaps the heavy landings at London City involving 146-like aircraft are a lot more common than I thought.
I did read something somewhere about a Crossair 146-like aircraft having one at that airport, and the video may well be of that incident. I will try to find that info.
the one in the video while looking extreme seems to have got out of it without damage.
By watching the video or you have agreater knowledge of that incident?
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just out of curiosity, what kind of windshear alerting does the 717 have? For those who asked what the wx was doing, apparently there were storms in the area.
I notice the ATSB has labelled the occurence category as an accident, so someone is taking it seriously. Having seen the photos, I would be.
Any truth to the 'Captain only for T/O & LDG' rule (reported here on Prrune)?
I notice the ATSB has labelled the occurence category as an accident, so someone is taking it seriously. Having seen the photos, I would be.
Any truth to the 'Captain only for T/O & LDG' rule (reported here on Prrune)?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: At a Bordello
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VH-
717 has both predictive and reactive Windshear systems.
No. However knowing NJS, that may soon be the case.
717 has both predictive and reactive Windshear systems.
Any truth to the 'Captain only for T/O & LDG' rule (reported here on Prrune)?
I agree with Lordflashhart, Hoofharted and Capt Claret.
There seems to be too much rubbing of hands hoping it's true, rather than professional discussion.
If what has been rumoured is true, then the crew concerned must be guttered as any of us would be if we damaged an aircraft.
If you want a united pilot group then it's time to start acting like one. Show these guys/gals your support. If there are lessons to be learned from this, then it will benefit all of us.
There seems to be too much rubbing of hands hoping it's true, rather than professional discussion.
If what has been rumoured is true, then the crew concerned must be guttered as any of us would be if we damaged an aircraft.
If you want a united pilot group then it's time to start acting like one. Show these guys/gals your support. If there are lessons to be learned from this, then it will benefit all of us.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: YBBN
Age: 72
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dr Clowneous you are joking n'est pas
CASA do something???
come on
why would they make a decision which might look like they are doing something. That might, in a court of law, appear as if they were involved and they might just be held liable for their actions.
what should happen is that they should be held accountable for their INACTIONS! CASA should be charged with culpable negligence for their inaction within the Australian aviation community during the past years.
also the NT News was asking in one of its columns just this Tuesday (12th Feb) for any pax on QF446 (shoot me if its the wrong flight number) to contact the paper for comment so it hasnt gone unnoticed.
CASA do something???
come on
why would they make a decision which might look like they are doing something. That might, in a court of law, appear as if they were involved and they might just be held liable for their actions.
what should happen is that they should be held accountable for their INACTIONS! CASA should be charged with culpable negligence for their inaction within the Australian aviation community during the past years.
also the NT News was asking in one of its columns just this Tuesday (12th Feb) for any pax on QF446 (shoot me if its the wrong flight number) to contact the paper for comment so it hasnt gone unnoticed.