Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Virgin Blue To Operate Embraer's On Albury-Sydney Route.

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Virgin Blue To Operate Embraer's On Albury-Sydney Route.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Mar 2008, 00:18
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My fur seems to be falling off me.

I must say thank you for those who have included me in the discussions.

As per 'KRUSTY 34', my position in VB is not important. And it was direct approach 34R (apologies for the typo) on that day, being such a lunch time flight the airport is a little less strangled.

'Flyitboy' the passengers onboard have a keen interest in physical flight time and I don't disagree that flyers need the exact timing from close of door to parking at the gate.

At the end of the day... the seats are filling and I have my job.
KittyBlue is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 01:56
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hear hear Kittyblue, keep up the good work. Good to hear ABX is doing OK for VB and here's hoping they might look at the MEL route down the track too, though not sure on how realistic that is!
apacau is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 03:26
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best way for the company to make those descisions ( like the ADL-BME seasonal) flights is to consider the connecting feeder service MELSYDABX rtn and if its constant and the right price is attracting passengers then it is doable. So fingers crossed for those who would like to see MELABX direct.
KittyBlue is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 04:36
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 38,000 ft
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it really worth flying to MEL. By the time you drive to the airport, check in, clear security, etc, you would have pretty much used up close to the three hours that it takes to drive. That doesnt even take into consideration any delays, holding by ATC, etc.

I can't see VB wasting an aircraft on this. There are surely other routes that would be more lucrative.
wirgin blew is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 04:53
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: OZ
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'oz' I have re read the posts that might have a neg impact on KB & I couldn't see one that was derogatory, insulting in anyway. These are all opinions with some accompanied by facts/personal experiences, no more no less! Maybe yr reading into the posts a little too much, besides 'KB' doesn't seem to be too offended


F
flyitboy is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 07:45
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was offended to a degree and I appreciated the sentiment of others. Thou as we are anon here I will accept it less personal than 'airline geek' emotional chat.

Hey as for those who connect from MEL at present there seem to be more from ADL,OOL and BNE on board.
KittyBlue is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 21:26
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,307
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Yes kitty.

But you didn't answer my question. Is there a problem with that?
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2008, 23:58
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,307
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Apparently there is!
KRUSTY 34 is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2008, 00:10
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: OZ
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'KB' I'll say soz here seeing as what I said may have upset you, wasn't what I wanted to do in the first place. I was just trying to get my views across from experience that's all. Pax in any form of transport just want to get there, as far as they are concerned once aboard any transport they would be thinking lets get this show on the rd, or in our case airborne. Just that planes are now no more exciting than riding a boring bus these days. It's just another form of transport. In fact if I have to pax on a plane it bores me to tears & I love flying (doing it myself) so can't imagine what it must be like for the gen public esspecially 'suit' types who have would take little pleasure being cramped inside a tube & fed stuff that supposed to represent food!
I believe it now takes longer to fly say ML-SYD these days than it did some years ago 'cause it's lack luster & no longer exciting for the pax so hence their all doing it causing the obvious & on the cheap!

F
flyitboy is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2008, 00:23
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Noosa Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pax see real professionals sitting up front wearing ties and caps so they will take a dash just ask Mark and Trev.
grumpy greyhound is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2008, 04:24
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nearly a week since the last post.....

I'd have thought this thread would have had more lively discussion as it is about the 'prop' versus the 'jet' argument.

Current indications are that despite a few early ABX flights that were full with the $1.00 fare payers the average 'Jungle Jet' loads SYD-ABX-SYD seemed to have settled down to around 30 pax per sector, which on a 78 set aircraft is a load factor of 38 percent on fares around $109.00!!

As the 'jungle Jet' costs USD $24 million per copy and jet fuel is currently costing around USD $107.00 per barrell, all this activity for no profit must be making for some interesting discussions in the DJ board room OUCH! Does anyone know how the 'Jungle Jet' is going in the Port Macquarie market against Eastern and what the comparative loads have been like?
THE ORACLE is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2008, 07:14
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know where you are getting your information from. I've done quite a few sy-ay-sy flights now and all have had 50+ pax, some 70+.
ccysam is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2008, 10:13
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, Albury services has had major support from the Albury community. Loads are 50-70 as noted by ccysam.

With the two services a day, they are complimented with the other rex services provided. Makes a very well used regional airport.
KittyBlue is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2008, 23:40
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AUS
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While it is a common misconception that a bringing in a Jet will dominate a market and 'break' the existing operator; History tell's otherwise. Sometimes people bite off more then they can chew.
Spotlight is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.