Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Finally, some balls - NJS Pilots take industrial action

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Finally, some balls - NJS Pilots take industrial action

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Sep 2007, 06:22
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: qld
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aircraft

I knew we shoulda gotya a dosette for your medication, so you wouldn keep missin it son.
swab is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2007, 09:12
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 90 Likes on 33 Posts
You do not have the right to not go backwards, and my blurb about the nature of the industry was to show that you pretty much have to go backwards, so you should be expecting it.
So you mean that people can go forwards?

If I was the last qualified person to be able to fly a B777, then by your reckoning, I can set my own pay?

"Flexibility" works both ways.

If there is ever a shortage of pilots, watch companies run to unions seeking a common award as fast as they can.
Meanwhile if there is a surplus,,,,,,, individual agreements are the way to go.


.................Hypocrits!
Sunfish is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 00:47
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: lost, 7500
Age: 39
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Capt Claret,

Thanks for the description. It seems the writing is on the wall, writ large, and says "thou shalt go backwards". Do you think this requirement has been imposed by the nature of the industry, or is due to government IR policies or has been caused by poor management?


RENURPP,
If the company is refusing to comply with certain terms and conditions in your agreement then I cannot not agree with your action, but the proposed industrial action is about more than just that isn't it?

A question for you now: do you believe your company is being honest to you with its explanations of, and justifications for, the things it is doing?
aircraft is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 01:04
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
do you believe your company is being honest to you with its explanations of, and justifications for, the things it is doing?
They couldn't lie straight in bed. especially considering how many of them are in bed together.
They cannot justify it.Not even to the courts.
If the company is refusing to comply with certain terms and conditions in your agreement then I cannot not agree with your action, but the proposed industrial action is about more than just that isn't it?
NO, the industrial action is directly related to non payment of conditions and dureess being applied to sign new AWA's on lesser conditions!!
RENURPP is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 12:49
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cairns QLD
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft, you poor deluded management type/ s##t stirrer. Have been following your unadulterated, anonymous posts for the last little while and have finally had enough of your bull.
The bulk of NJS employees only want what is good for them and the company, as it helps us all, however with goddam hopeless management types with brains similar to yours running this operation into the ground, then there is not much hope.
However we have such a fantastic bunch of people that want to succeed, that are not prepared to prostitute themselves, and to achieve that end result, when it is not necessary, our illustrious management/owners want to screw us over!
Nah I do not think so. NJS/COBHAM have the best bunch of people, like a whole lot of other Companies, that have been willing to go the extra yard for a long time to keep their Employers business running in their, and the Companies interest.
And funnily enough that's what keeps most companies going. If only we, as a very small, insignificant, rare commodity in this aviation world, continue to support our chosen Employer then they may well continue to prosper.
Ross Oakley is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 12:58
  #186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pass-A-Frozo
Striking is good for the company?
Jesus, P-A-F, what else did you get for Christmas? My 2yo stopped blatting on his toy trumpet months ago.
ITCZ is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 12:59
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cairns QLD
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PAF, you idiot, you are the only person that has mentioned striking on this post!!!

You are right up there with Aircraft!!
Ross Oakley is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 13:21
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: perth
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Blind Leading The Entwined !?

While I am happy to normally read rather than enter these rambling blogs, for those of us more objective than cynical it needs to be reminded that NJS did not pay CPI only to pilots whose AWA's had been replaced by a new AWA AGREED AND ENDORSED by our nominated pilot committee. My view was that the new AWA, while not optimal, was the best outcome that could be achieved by the old pilot group on our behalf which was also agreed by all of us in support of the QF contract that NJS subsequently obtained. I for one, will not support any action stimulated by propoganda by a bunch of pilots that reneged on that deal to serve their own greed to maintain superior pay than the rest of us who followed through & signed. Now they want us to turn on the company & help them lose money instead of finding more ways to make more money under a signed agreed proviso that it will be shared with us. Get real guys, we are in a business & in the end the more we fragment the business the more we ALL have to lose.
blaster666 is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 15:11
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: lost, 7500
Age: 39
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RENURPP,

Regarding the honesty of the management: leaving aside the issue of their alleged non-compliance with certain terms and conditions, if it could be shown that they were being completely honest with respect to the other things that are in dispute, would that change your attitude?

Ross Oakley,

Your idea of what is best for the company is most probably flawed. If you are only a pilot then you will most probably see things with the blinkered view that most pilots have.

The vast majority of pilots tend to be spectacularly ignorant of the business and management aspects of their companies and I'm sure the NJS pilots are no exception.

It seems to be a tradition among pilots to regard their management as inept. How many pilots do you know that have a favourable view of their management?

Answer me this: do you think a group of NJS pilots could replace the current management and do a better job?

I am not a "management type", by the way. I am a GA pilot that has nothing to do with any management. Unlike you however, I am a realist that understands and accepts the nature of the aviation industry and my position in it.
aircraft is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 16:41
  #190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft you're showing your true colours here. "ONLY a pilot"
EPIRB is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 19:33
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
do you think a group of NJS pilots could replace the current management and do a better job?
Our management are simply a bunch of ex engineers and pilots.
The answer is YES, I suggest there would be pilots amongst our group who could do a better job!

BLASTER666
My view was that the new AWA, while not optimal, was the best outcome that could be achieved by the old pilot group on our behalf which was also agreed by all of us in support of the QF contract that NJS subsequently obtained.
I for one, will not support any action stimulated by propoganda by a bunch of pilots that reneged on that deal to serve their own greed to maintain superior pay than the rest of us who followed through & signed.
Well your entitled to your view, (you for 1, that just about covers that. Theres probably about 3 of you) it just differs from 90% + of the pilots, the Workplace Ombudsmand and soon to be the courts. The ones who did sign were forced and that will followed up with DURESS cases.
Industrial law does not allow a group of individuals, some of whom were not elected, to represent other pilots who are not even members of your band of heroes’. Even if it does suit managements needs.

Last edited by RENURPP; 3rd Oct 2007 at 03:30.
RENURPP is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 21:17
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blaster 666

You are misguided and have been brainwashed.

READ A BOOK, preferably an IR Law Book before posting again.


You need to dig a little deeper to ascertain who was representing whom and who signed what when.

You were played like a brand new harpsichord.

Last edited by David_Webb; 10th Sep 2007 at 21:28.
David_Webb is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 21:27
  #193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft

Just get out, out of this industry, and out of this thread.

You are an idiot and I am sick of it.
David_Webb is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 23:43
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Hornets Nest, NSW
Posts: 832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With due respect, you guys and girls will continue to feed the monkeys.... Just ignore them. Their arguments are floored in many ways and in all honesty could well be a tool/tactic being used to draw your strategy out into the open so as to be used against you.

Look up the term narcissism. You might get the drift of what really turns them on.

P_A_F. Do you want a mechanic to embarrass you again? Give it a rest. Did you ever think of trying understand why it has gotten to this point? Don't post your answer, go away and think about it.
OpsNormal is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2007, 00:21
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: perth
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr Hold Out Your Hand Boys !

Together - we'll never be defeated !!

Hey I know - let's not let the bastards pay us our $7500 retention bonus this January and tell 'em to stick next year's as well. That'll fix em.

Oh.....hang on that would only reduce the things we've got to bitch about in terms of how bad we are off working 77 hours a month for $126k plus allowances and $7500 for each of the next 2 years in bonuses regardless of the company's profitability !!!

In terms of industrial law, I would have thought the contract that we signed largely governed our terms which reads in mine (and I am sure in yours)

The Employer shall consult with the National Jet Systems Pilot Group Committee as the recognised bargaining agent of the Pilot and each other Pilot employed by the Employer in relation to any variation of the provisions of this AWA and the negotiation of any successor agreement.


mmmmmmmmmmm..........it seems we agreed to something that was surposed to work in our favour and are now don't like the fact that the company abides by the provisions. Damn.......the agreement was only surpose to work in our favour wasn't it !!????

Let's get the WO to fix it for us. They won't know about the fact that that we are reneging on our deal. In fact, if we don't look in the mirror we won't ever believe that either.

Damn that old pilot group for selling out our interests.

I bet the current pilot group would never do anything that might hurt NJS pilots interests in the long term would it !!!!!!???????
blaster666 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2007, 01:33
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blaster 666 wrote:

$7500 for each of the next 2 years in bonuses regardless of the company's profitability !!!
Excuse me, but that is not a 'Bonus', that is MY money that I have salary sacrificed to pay for an endorsement which the company needed 'help' in paying for to get the contract.

AND they wrote it into the AWA to pay it back!!! It is no way a bonus!

Some people have NO idea!
JetRacer is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2007, 01:49
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Bolak
Age: 58
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blaster 666

Riddle me this.



Apply some critical thought and find the answers to the following questions;

1. In the clause you mentioned, which party is appointing the NJSPG as your Bargaining Agent? The Employer or the Employee?

2. Which clause in the Workplace Relations Act (pre-reform or Work Choices) covers AWA Bargaining Agents?

3.Who may appoint them?

4.What is the required process?

5.Acting as an Agent, Can Anybody legally oblige you to make a contract with another party?

6. Did your Bargaining Agents sign the AWA commended to you?

7.If so, when? On what date?


No more dirty laundry in public PM to answers to me.
The J55 Riddler is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2007, 02:15
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OpsNormal

P_A_F. Do you want a mechanic to embarrass you again
Hope thats not a put down on the engineers? sum ov us went to skool to lern how to reed n rite!
Toolman101 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2007, 03:47
  #199 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: See you, NT
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pass-A-Frozo
Originally Posted by ITCZ
what else did you get for Christmas?
A lovely wife!
Congratulations. Has she learned any English yet?
Kransky is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2007, 04:48
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Horn Island
Posts: 1,044
Received 33 Likes on 8 Posts
Blaster666,

Your complete lack of knowledge on the subject has proven the fool you are.
RENURPP is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.