Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Darwin Radar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jul 2007, 18:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: @home
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever you've been inhaling, drinking or injecting there 44 Wing you should stop because it is making you delusional!! Multiple PANs and Maydays - yeah right!!! And before you get on your high horse - I worked there and I worked there when it was at its busiest!!! Complex; yeah occasionally but generally only when there was multiple fighter recoveries (during Exercise periods) that wanted individual instrument approaches no MARSA (Why.... because they could) and during the vagaries of the wet season when there were big diversions going on due to WX. The Darwin TMP makes no sense since traffic levels have dwindled over the years..... could it be that the TMP was implemented to guard against the possibility of radar failure? This all singing, all dancing radar that you spruke has had reliability issues over the years due to high heat and humidity, any wonder that AsA don't use the feed if it has proven to be unreliable in the past. Could it be that the RAAF don't want anyone to use their bat and ball because AsA are picking the best players for their team? If you are not an ADF controller 44 Wing, then why be an apologist for that corporation unless you are of course the mouthpiece for 44 Wing!!
For everyone else following this don't jump on the people at the coalface as they are just doing what they are told to do, fortunately for them now there is an alternative to life in blue and they are being actively sought. As a DN SATCO once said to me as I was nearing the end "If you don't like what you are being told to do, then don't be a hypocrite and continue to take the paycheck; resign!!" I DID!!!!
celeritas is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2007, 00:50
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mean while, the wet season is approaching and we have Class A airspace without radar coverage, procedural departures out of a International airport causing increased costs to the industry, and Airservices throwing bricks at the RAAF, and the RAAF throwing them back at Airservices.

This whole matter should have been resolved within a few days. Its time Minister Vaile got off his backside and fixed it.
Dog One is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2007, 04:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by coral
Hempy - I take issue with you there. ASA is not funded by taxpayers, it is funded by airspace users - ...except of course the RAAF (including the Lib/Nat Air Taxi Service - VIP SQN) - they pay nothing.
coral, that isn't my assertion, I was pointing out the inference made by 44Wing when he(?) wrote

AsA...gets increased defence dollars for improving/upgrading infrastructure by providing services that defence was providing (free)
and

Merely by moving tax dollars from one organisation to another
I am well aware how Airservices makes their cash, I also remember when ASA was a "Public Service" as opposed to a "Government Business Enterprise". Commercialisation, anyone?
Hempy is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2007, 04:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: All over the place
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
44wing

What are you smoking (from reading your post on page 1)? There are ex RAAF DN ATC all over the place and I've never heard stuff like your spruiking - too many motivational speeched from WLM methinks. The Pitch Black recoveries were always a frigging strategically mismanaged air show and most if not all of that talent which tactically prevented the aluminium welding (back when DN used to move over 110K pa - now reduced to 80K in 06/07) is with the civil provider in Australia and OS. Celeritas' post (5 above) encapsulates it all quite nicely for all the ex-ADF and DN people I've met.

RAAF DN used to do arrivals outside 30 miles (after years of App doing both on one frequency after ASA left the bulding - looking back at that 0-50 miles era wasn't that a mismanaged bunch of egocentric bollocks!) so give it back to them!

Last edited by Track Coastal; 16th Jul 2007 at 11:58.
Track Coastal is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2007, 11:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: godzone
Age: 65
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dudes - chill.

I have heard that the problem with the RAAF radar feeds is caused by ASA insisting on dual paths (read redundancy - I cant wait!) and the RAAF only having single path. Hence the stand off.

Many dollars required to get the Raytheon data gatherer to talk in the same language as the Thales interpreter!
rack 'n stack is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2007, 10:51
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, will we have radar coverage before the wet season, or will we still watching ASA and the RAAF have a battle of words. What are RAPAC's views of this?
Dog One is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2007, 06:18
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: australia, at the base of a hill
Age: 42
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There seems to be a lot of gripes on here reference ATC, my ideal solution would be to have ACO's (GCI by trade) running all the airspace in Australia as we are the tactical wizard's of the airspace game.

My thoughts only.

Cheesy1
cheesyeye is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2007, 06:44
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a very long experience inside the RAAF before moving on. I think I know who will be dragging their heels on this one........and I also doubt they'll care.
DutchRoll is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2007, 07:21
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: there
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
cheesyeye - BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Nice one! There are two airfields in this country that spring to mind with somewhat ordinary controlling. One could be forgiven as it is a training center. I'll let you guess what the other one is!
slice is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2007, 08:27
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Anywhere but here
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wouldn't want SATC failures running a tower...you ACO's keep the aircraft too close to one another......Fly high now Gooses...
Dixondik is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.