Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific
Reload this Page >

Jetstar a lacklustre attempt: Virgin

Wikiposts
Search
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Jetstar a lacklustre attempt: Virgin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 06:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 298
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Jetstar a lacklustre attempt: Virgin

Here's a news item from e*trade:
Jetstar a lacklustre attempt: Virgin
03/06/2004 02:34:44 PM


Virgin Blue threw down the gauntlet to its budget rival Jetstar, labelling it a "lacklustre attempt" by the Qantas group to compete with the low cost carrier.

Virgin Blue head of strategy and communication David Huttner said he doubted the Qantas-owned subsidiary was viable in its present form and believed it had made too many compromises.

He said Jetstar's inflexible 30-minute check-in and Qantas' decision to replace its own domestic services to key tourism destinations like the Gold and Sunshine coasts with the new budget carrier would backfire.

"People should not have to compromise between great service and low fares," Mr Huttner told journalists at the Australian Tourism Exchange conference in Melbourne.

"We have as many low fare seats as them, we are competing and continue to compete aggressively with Qantas, and Jetstar is proving to be a lacklustre attempt to try and neutralise that."

On Wednesday, Jetstar chief executive Alan Joyce said he admired Virgin Blue and believed Australia could handle the two low-cost airlines as well as Qantas domestic.

But he said Virgin Blue was having an "each-way bet" by not following the successful overseas budget airline model, such as that used by successful Irish airline RyanAir.

Jetstar has had about 250,000 airline seats booked since it launched on May 25, operating to 14 ports with 670 flights a week.

Mr Huttner denied Virgin Blue was in a dilemma over its role as a budget airline between Qantas domestic and Jetstar.

"We made a conscious choice that you could continue to be the country's low-cost leader but still offer quality service and not be cheap," he said.

"It's easy to be cheap but a little bit harder to be cheerful."
It looks to me as though Virgin have been hurting of late, with all of the air time going to the new kid on the block.

I guess Godfrey & Huttner have decided that any publicity is good publicity - clutching at straws perhaps...?
Johhny Utah is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 07:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Virgin share price is down below issue price and falling, latest figures show Qantas regaining market share from Virgin and Qantas has beaten Virgin for on-time performance over the last three months, no wonder Huttner has to resort (yet again) to slanging the competition.
slim is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 08:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VB should adjust its policy (as do their counterpart in Europe) about strict check-in times.
If they enforced a strict law then their on-time performance just may improve.

If a customer is travelling then in all earnest they should endevour to arrive by the appropriate time.
When catching a train and knowing its departure time you dont arrive late and complain.
A timetable is just that - a bloody timetable.
In places like Japan you can set your watches by them they are so efficient.

Huttner and Godfrey have kicked up a stink by demanding that the Airport Authorities publish on-time figures as a comparison, that is until they have been flogged three months running by QF!

If anything it will bring customers in line with other lower cost carriers around Europe as well as other places in the world where not being on time can cause all sorts of hassles.
TIMMEEEE is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 00:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Melbourne,Vic, Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rumour has it that VB has a van that runs around checking the departure and arrival times of the opposition (in this case Qantas).

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but dont Qantas (like all international carriers) use ACARS data for this???

I havent flown for a few years now but the last time I programmed the ACARS pre departure we always updated it to the GMT world timer prior to inputting flight data.

Perhaps Virgin could deploy their "watchdogs" elsewhere so that they may be able to contribute to their less than competitive on-time performance of late.

It makes you crack up when the head of VB gets on the television and demands comparitive despatch figures be published,only to find themselves on the receiving end.

What was that saying, "surgeon, heal thyself."
1013 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 01:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: bumf*ck, idaho
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Joyces argument would have credence if Jetstar were the cheapest.
A recent comparison found jetstar the dearest compared to QF and VB on the SYD-MEL! And they went to Avalon!! Oh dear......
Sonny Hammond is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 02:10
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1013 Qantas does use ACARS for dept/arrv times, the clock is auto updated with the occasional manual update.
Funny how Alan Joyce admires RyanAir, I heard that they were not doing too well at present.
bombshell is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 02:40
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sonny -
Flights ex-AVV are bursting at the seams. There is very few seats available. If all you can find are the dearer fares it means the flights are chockers.

Same when people used to compare DJ and QF and say DJ was dearer. Yeh it was but all its cheap seats were gone. So QF was dumping cheap seats or the cheap seats they did have weren't taken (as they had more capacity). Either way. For JQ to be more expensive it actually means they are doing well!

JQ have 3 flights to SYD and 2 to BNE. How many do the others have? (I wouldn't call AVV-SYD competing with MEL-SYD.) You need to take into account load factors and capacity etc. (Apples with apples etc.)
ditzyboy is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 04:24
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know why Virgin say they are so cheap. I had to go to Perth last year and they were $200 dearer than Qantas.
Z Force is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 19:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Down under land
Posts: 307
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
z force - it's all about marketing to the public.
Virgin (& now Jetstar) are constantly promoted as budget/discount airlines, so people have a mind set that this is the case.
They get their prices from them first, and finding a reasonable fare, hand over the $. Often, depending on fare classes available etc, Qantas may have a cheaper seat, but it's too late by then.
Methinks just clever marketing
Watchdog is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 19:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While it hurts me to agree with anything Watchdog said......

That is true about the fares.

My Wife recently flew to Melbourne and back, so before she went I checked Virgin Blue online as I presumed they would be the cheapest, then I thought I may as well have a look at Qantas, and to my amazement Qantas were actually some $20 cheaper than Virgin Blue.

So needless to say she went Qantas.

I never even considered Jetstar of course, as I still love my Wife.
airsupport is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 20:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: utopia
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ditzy;

For JQ to be more expensive it actually means they are doing well!
I think you've missed the point.

I never even considered Jetstar of course, as I still love my Wife.
You will get over that Airsupport, I'm sure. But having said that, for those out there who want to get rid of theirs, I think you have just found an ingenious way to put them in great danger....
Chuck Magutzup is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 20:37
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brisbane
Age: 77
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't say that.........

That could probably be considered to be encouraging someone to commit a crime.

I don't want to be involved in a court case if someone takes up your suggestion.
airsupport is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 21:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Down under land
Posts: 307
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
good morning lame, i've been waiting for your daily dramatisation
Watchdog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.