Difference between Approach/Departure & Radar.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
<<Personally, I think it was a way of "showing off"......... in much the same way as Heathrow has a DIRECTOR to show how big and importand it is >>
Well thank you, sir! I had no idea I was so well thought of!!!
HD
Well thank you, sir! I had no idea I was so well thought of!!!
HD
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Kandahar Afghanistan
Re: Difference between Approach/Departure & Radar.
Field In Sight,
I'm a controller and I'm confused by the answers provided by my brethern from across the pond.
Anyway, in the US, Approach is used for acft inbound to the primary and or satellite airports, and for overflights.
Departure is used for acft that have departed the primary or satellite airports within my airspace.
Granted I have good Radar coverage where I can see acft on the runway at FWA and I can see them out of 1800 off my satellite airports.
Things are so much easier over here,
Mike
I'm a controller and I'm confused by the answers provided by my brethern from across the pond.
Anyway, in the US, Approach is used for acft inbound to the primary and or satellite airports, and for overflights.
Departure is used for acft that have departed the primary or satellite airports within my airspace.
Granted I have good Radar coverage where I can see acft on the runway at FWA and I can see them out of 1800 off my satellite airports.
Things are so much easier over here,
Mike
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Spanish Riviera
I may be wrong, but I thought that "RADAR" only applied to an ATCRU.
I know Brize still uses the term Radar but that's because they couldn't think of a way to differentaite between LARS and Radar Approach when they lost their Area Radar status.
I know Brize still uses the term Radar but that's because they couldn't think of a way to differentaite between LARS and Radar Approach when they lost their Area Radar status.
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
From: Anywhere
WBS
In the military - yes, but not in the civil world.
MATS 1 App E 3.1. They give a table of ATC service against R/T suffix used.
It's interesting to note the comments about Radar:
So reading that suggests that if you're a Radar controller doing arrivals and departures then radar is what you say.
CM
In the military - yes, but not in the civil world.
MATS 1 App E 3.1. They give a table of ATC service against R/T suffix used.
It's interesting to note the comments about Radar:
ATC Service - Approach Radar Control Arrival / Departure.
Suffix - Director / Departure (Radar when tasks combined/ Arrival (when approved))
Suffix - Director / Departure (Radar when tasks combined/ Arrival (when approved))
CM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: UK
Field in site, If you place 50 ATco's in a room you will get at least 50 different answers.
It does depend on where and how you were trained.
Personally if I am sat in front of a radar I am always "radar", if I should answer the phone for the radar controller as they are busy I call myself "approach" as I would then be providing a procedural service (some of us do still hold those ratings in Nats and no I am not old)
It does depend on where and how you were trained.
Personally if I am sat in front of a radar I am always "radar", if I should answer the phone for the radar controller as they are busy I call myself "approach" as I would then be providing a procedural service (some of us do still hold those ratings in Nats and no I am not old)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: UK
All very confusing. At our unit some of us who can't remember who we are just use the callsign with no suffix. At least then you don't call yourself app or rad when you're in the twr and vice versa. All very illegal of course but hey!
Avoid imitations



Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,112
Likes: 1,086
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
It does get a little confusing at times. I regularly fly past one such airfield (Coventry) that sometimes has radar available, sometimes not.
Sometimes I wish a radar info service, sometimes in better weather I am happy with a flight info.
I get round the problem by calling just the airfield name on Approach freq. and waiting for the ATC reply, suffixed with "approach" or "radar" before making the appropriate request.
Sometimes, if it's obviously very busy for the "radar" controller we just ask for flight info anyway to help ease his workload a bit.
Sometimes I wish a radar info service, sometimes in better weather I am happy with a flight info.
I get round the problem by calling just the airfield name on Approach freq. and waiting for the ATC reply, suffixed with "approach" or "radar" before making the appropriate request.
Sometimes, if it's obviously very busy for the "radar" controller we just ask for flight info anyway to help ease his workload a bit.






