Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Pay ballot result

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd September 2002 | 08:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: LTCC
Question Pay ballot result

Anyone heard the result??

On days off so will be the last to hear.
Dytter is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 09:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
I believe the result is due to be announced at noon, monday 2nd September
Data Dad is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 12:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire, Scotland
Majority in favour. Details shortly.
Findo is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 12:12
  #4 (permalink)  
ZIP250
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No Surprise there then. Powder still dry and untested,

Z
 
Old 2nd September 2002 | 14:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
I can't remember exactly... I think it's something just over 60% for and just under 40% against.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 17:26
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Northwest
Angry

On leave and knew the result was supposed to be announced at 2.00 this afternoon, what better place to find the result than on the union's web site............ but no - nothing as usual.

I thought a website was for communication - I must be wrong. Better getting the news off the rumour mill that is these pages. Thanks guys for keeping me updated.

Shame about the result, perhaps we should have taken a leaf out of those nice firemen chaps who believe they're worth 40% extra to get them back on an even footing after 25 years of below average increases (sound familiar?)
DangerousD is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 17:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: England
The result was 60% in favour of the deal!!

Ho Hum, I'm off to see the Bank Manager for another loan
Roger Dodge is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 21:12
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 892
Likes: 6
From: southampton,hampshire,england
pay vote

No difficulty getting result. Number on back of membership card. 80%voted//966[62.9%]FOR,570[37.1%]AGAINST. I think.
055166k is offline  
Old 2nd September 2002 | 21:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Unhappy

Well, friends - and I mean this most sincerely - where the h**l were the FOUR HUNDRED or so who could not be bothered to return their ballot papers ???? Don't complain that your union does nothing for you - if you're not prepared to support it or take an interest in such a ballot. I, for one, thank the team who managed to get us the improved figure on the table.
Cheers guys !!
Liobian is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 10:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: LONDON
An acceptable start in the revaluing of the workforce I'd say and thank you to the union team who managed to get the ball rolling. The next round, beginning late next year, needs to keep it rolling. We must be equally assertive so that by 2005 we are valued correctly.

Point 4
120.4 is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 10:49
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Here to Eternity
Don't wish to rain on the parade of the ATCOs among you who are now looking forward to a bit of a rise and some back-pay...

Since the engineers and PCS are still in dispute with management, have yet to come to a deal and the TU side still have a unanimity agreement... I don't imagine you'll be getting the rise you voted in favour of until the other parties are resolved and accepted via ballot too.

So now it seems the roles are reversed...
Undercover is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 15:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: my house
undercover,

thought somehow that you all said a big yes back in the midst of times
foo fighting is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 15:37
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: England
I'm glad we're all happy and don't have to go on strike now we've got an extra 0.5% this year. Congratulations to all those who voted yes; those extra months waiting for an extra tenner a week (before tax) have been really worth it. We really stuck it to 'em.
Greebson is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 17:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Asgard
B*gg*r!
Loki is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 22:07
  #15 (permalink)  

Watchdog Delta Hotel
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: here but there in 6 years
bit of a strange attitude zero

pcs and the eng's yes vote was on the basis that there was no more money in the pot

tere obviously was as we atco's got more

it therefore made thier votes accepting the original deal null and void

so if they don't get an acceptable offer and vote no then the previous post is correct
back to square one remember all branches have to vote yes we are still one union i think you may be getting ahead of yourself
mainecoon is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 22:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Bracknell
I hear that the extra money that now has to be found to fund the pay rise will come from existing budgets. Now if the ATCOS were to give up all that paper and pens used on flight strips it might be affordable!!
rickity is offline  
Old 4th September 2002 | 07:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Here to Eternity
The fact is PCS and Engineers were right to believe there was no more money in the pot... There isn't!! They don't have the money to pay for the increased ATCO offer. Simple as that.

As mentioned they have said it will be funded from existing budgets. What this really means is that they will fund it by cutting costs/jobs/conditions.

The PCS and Engineers ballots were set aside as soon as an offer on basic pay was made to ATCOs. So we all have to be balloted again, once management give us an equally acceptable offer. So don't hold your breath.


It always pays to read the small print....
Undercover is offline  
Old 4th September 2002 | 07:58
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: ScACC
They don't have the money to pay for the increased ATCO offer. Simple as that.
Well perhaps had management been more economical with the cash in the past this would not be the case!!!

BillyBoy is offline  
Old 4th September 2002 | 11:06
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: UK
I think it seriously dumb to try and force a 'full value' pay rise when the company is struggling. It's no good whining about ppp. We have got it and the trick is to use it to our advantage.

The time to wield 'the big stick' is in two or three years time when traffic growth is booming across the pond ('cause that's where the big bucks come from) and every one is flush with cash.

As ATCO's we have to face two realities:

A/ If we want to have a bigger slice of the pie we have to ditch the idea of unanimity with other unions. I am not advocating this; I think its a reprehensible thing, but I bet we get told or even offered this by management at some time in the near future. So do we just look after ourselves, or be the raft to which grades cling?

B/ The economic rose tinted glasses that most units have been using to view the world with have gone for ever, and the way management have run 'real' contracts like London City and Cardiff will be the way every unit will be faced with. The unlimited en-route pot is over. Us in Airports will still be the poor relations, despite the fact that we are the ones currently keeping the ship afloat.

The future is not Orange (let alone rosy) any more. Get used to it Big Boys; the Perch and Minnow society has been used to this for years and now it's everyone elses turn to join.

Does anyone really think it would be better State run? You ask any Airport employee. They know what's been happening to them over a period of years. Now it's the turn for en-route.
Spaced Vortex is offline  
Old 4th September 2002 | 13:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Here to Eternity
Billy Boy - a small point... but still...

Before PPP this company was is an extrememly healthy financial state. All our creditors were paid well within time and the government got a nice little return from the profits of a "non profit making company"

In one day you land that company with £800m of fresh new debt and there's not really any way of avoiding a struggle. So in that sense I don't think management can be blamed for mis-managing the finances... although they CAN be blamed for rolling out the red carpet to the government and trying to convince us all it really was a good idea!!
Undercover is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.