Gatwick Flow Rate?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Location: At the bar
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gatwick Flow Rate?
Seems as though there are a ton of cancelled/delayed flights at LGW, with numerous diversions to LTN/other airports. Reportedly down to lack of ATC personnel.... anyone know more?
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Confirmed as a shortage of ATC staff by Gatwick airport twitter. Apparently short notice staff absence.
To have no spare/ standby/ slack for one controller going sick is really poor. Massively understaffed at LGW - you’d like to think the CAA would get involved.
To have no spare/ standby/ slack for one controller going sick is really poor. Massively understaffed at LGW - you’d like to think the CAA would get involved.
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Dublin
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not the first time it’s happened at Gatwick in the last 12 months or so.. getting a bit tiresome now
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NZ
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typically organisations that employ controllers are driven by someone who watches a spreadsheet. Activities such as COVID, 9-11, contract renewals always concentrate the mind on the bottom line. Little relevance is given to the time it takes to train and the actual number of seats available to train in. This latter is normally the major problem.
Years ago we were training controllers in a European country and were told how many we had to provide classroom/simulator training for that year - All for one tower. It turned out that the actual On Job Training capacity was about 10% of the numbers receiving basic training.
Sadly the magic solution is always some years back - bean counting rarely looks further than the CEO's KPI's and bonus needs and normally they have moved on (with bonus) before the crises occurs.
Years ago we were training controllers in a European country and were told how many we had to provide classroom/simulator training for that year - All for one tower. It turned out that the actual On Job Training capacity was about 10% of the numbers receiving basic training.
Sadly the magic solution is always some years back - bean counting rarely looks further than the CEO's KPI's and bonus needs and normally they have moved on (with bonus) before the crises occurs.
Pegase Driver
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is indeed par t of the problem. The bean counters generally cater for the average numbers of flights , not the peaks. In addition if an airline decides to move its hub from an airport for another one, the balance of traffic is sudden , meaning from decision to first flights can be weeks ( or even days in some cases. ) Recruitment to fully ops controller in a major airport is anything from a year ( for transfers) to up to 3 years for ab initio. So you'll always be behind.
Another unspoked factor is part time. Due to the ( welcomed) feminisation of the job , since it is rather well paid, many are requesting part time after their first kid, so you might have the numbers on paper but not available 100% of the time ,
That said, if a single controller call in sick and its supervisor is unable to immediately find a stand by duty to fill the gap, and this is causing the kind of disruptions we have see in EGKK, then it shows how tight their operations are .
Another unspoked factor is part time. Due to the ( welcomed) feminisation of the job , since it is rather well paid, many are requesting part time after their first kid, so you might have the numbers on paper but not available 100% of the time ,
That said, if a single controller call in sick and its supervisor is unable to immediately find a stand by duty to fill the gap, and this is causing the kind of disruptions we have see in EGKK, then it shows how tight their operations are .
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't this issue go back several years when NATS lost the ATC contract at Gatwick?
The new Gatwick company did such a 'great' job that they eventually handed it back for NATS to run. NATS inherited all the problems and a lot of them don't get resolved overnight, particularly with staff shortages.
Not that NATS are squeaky clean. Their recruitment and training policies over the last few years leave a lot to be desired.
The new Gatwick company did such a 'great' job that they eventually handed it back for NATS to run. NATS inherited all the problems and a lot of them don't get resolved overnight, particularly with staff shortages.
Not that NATS are squeaky clean. Their recruitment and training policies over the last few years leave a lot to be desired.
NATS only got the contract back 11 months ago, the rot set in under ANS.
Neo380 or MoL pointing the finger at NATS are way off the mark.
https://travelradar.aero/nats-gatwick-airport/
The underlying problem generally with Air Traffic staffing is you have a small number of qualified people doing the job.
Say you need 4 or 5 ATCOs to run a radar bank or tower, to add another for contingency adds 20/25% to cost base. The sums are very different for an airline with 100s of pilots qualified on the same equipment.
Neo380 or MoL pointing the finger at NATS are way off the mark.
https://travelradar.aero/nats-gatwick-airport/
The underlying problem generally with Air Traffic staffing is you have a small number of qualified people doing the job.
Say you need 4 or 5 ATCOs to run a radar bank or tower, to add another for contingency adds 20/25% to cost base. The sums are very different for an airline with 100s of pilots qualified on the same equipment.
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NATS only got the contract back 11 months ago, the rot set in under ANS.
Neo380 or MoL pointing the finger at NATS are way off the mark on this occasion.
https://travelradar.aero/nats-gatwick-airport/
The underlying problem with Air Traffic staffing is you have a small number of qualified people doing the job.
Say you need 4 or 5 ATCOs to run a radar bank or tower, to add another for contingency adds 20/25% to cost base. The sums are very different for an airline with 100s of pilots qualified on the same equipment.
Neo380 or MoL pointing the finger at NATS are way off the mark on this occasion.
https://travelradar.aero/nats-gatwick-airport/
The underlying problem with Air Traffic staffing is you have a small number of qualified people doing the job.
Say you need 4 or 5 ATCOs to run a radar bank or tower, to add another for contingency adds 20/25% to cost base. The sums are very different for an airline with 100s of pilots qualified on the same equipment.
NATS (staff) can take just as much blame for the ANS contract as anyone - failing 21/23 trainees (at one point) might have been because of the £1,000/day overtime rates, but it was also always the intention to force the contract back into NATS hands.
So be honest, and check your facts, please - this was a situation of NATS making.
So they should have kept the trainees on in case they won a contract 2 years later?
A contract that shouldn’t have been available until end of 2025?
You might think that’s a great way to run a business but it’s not something the customer would be happy to pay for.
A contract that shouldn’t have been available until end of 2025?
You might think that’s a great way to run a business but it’s not something the customer would be happy to pay for.
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So yes, I do think you honour your commitment to a trainee when they’re 98% through training.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The underlying problem generally with Air Traffic staffing is you have a small number of qualified people doing the job.
Say you need 4 or 5 ATCOs to run a radar bank or tower, to add another for contingency adds 20/25% to cost base. The sums are very different for an airline with 100s of pilots qualified on the same equipment.
Say you need 4 or 5 ATCOs to run a radar bank or tower, to add another for contingency adds 20/25% to cost base. The sums are very different for an airline with 100s of pilots qualified on the same equipment.
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True, and not true as well. Especially considering that having a generous standby level at all times is cash wise peanuts considering the rest of the cost of running ATC at the worlds busies single runway airport. And even more so considering not doing so will increase the pressure to legislate financial responsibility in for a service promised and not provided, a service airlines have to pay handsomely for. After all, they are liable for measures they have to take to accommodate their customers. And for exactly that reason airlines nowadays actually play for peaks, not averages, and usually a higher than normally needed crewing level. You can operate a shorthaul aircraft on a full schedule at 3,5 to 4 crews per aircraft. However, it is usually done at 6 to 7 as that allows a much higher stability of the operation. Which is needed, in part due to ATC systems all over europe having not the required personnel and no financial incentive (liability) to provide it.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If NATS had emerged from the Covid crisis with a retained pool of trainees it would arguably have given them an unfair advantage over other suppliers such as ANS. Although of course those trainees, even if they fully completed the college, are a long way off providing any solution to the current issue. From ab-initio to the world's busiest single runway airport is quite a jump.
Last edited by eglnyt; 15th Sep 2023 at 11:26. Reason: removed errant character
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a well crafted excuse for every piece of mismanagement in this organisation, but the truth is we’re back in ‘famine’ now, so ‘feast’ will follow and ‘famine’ will follow that.
It’s a cultural problem, as if succession planning is ‘something we don’t do here’.
It’s a cultural problem, as if succession planning is ‘something we don’t do here’.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Feast and famine is a little harder. The airline business is tied to the world economy. Setbacks and in particular the length of them are difficult to predict. The setbacks after 9/11 and Covid were much shorter than most people expected. That after the 2008 crash was much longer. Somebody has to pay for that period you keep training controllers ready for the inevitable upturn and nobody wants to, least of all governments. The government funded ANSPs after 2008 cut back far more than the one funded by its customers that you dislike so much.
