Originally Posted by
Del Prado
So they should have kept the trainees on in case they won a contract 2 years later?
A contract that shouldn’t have been available until end of 2025?
You might think that’s a great way to run a business but it’s not something the customer would be happy to pay for.
NATS regret it. And NATS created ANS because one of its MDs couldn’t put up with the internal dysfunction any longer.
So yes, I do think you honour your commitment to a trainee when they’re 98% through training.