ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ANS v NATS

Old 25th Jul 2019, 05:42
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: N/A
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by DanJaws View Post


Not sure about the NATS era, but instructors have made it clear that provided you’re showing the effort and commitment required, they’ll go to great lengths to ensure a successful outcome. I’ve never had a problem with anybody helping me, or guiding me during my training.
Perhaps DanJaws could enlighten us as to how many ATCOs since ANS took over have been employed, trained, validated or resigned.
Rwy1234 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 06:33
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: uk
Age: 54
Posts: 70
Why would he wish to give out such information? Seems a few on here have an agenda where ANS is concerned. Personally, I think they’re a breath of fresh air in a market that really needed it.
handleturning is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 06:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: N/A
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by handleturning View Post
Why would he wish to give out such information? Seems a few on here have an agenda where ANS is concerned. Personally, I think they’re a breath of fresh air in a market that really needed it.
Why such defence and why would he not give out such information? He has given out other such information in his 3 posts.

Seems there are few people here that think everyone have an agenda where ANS is concerned.
Rwy1234 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 08:45
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: uk
Age: 54
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by Rwy1234 View Post


Why such defence and why would he not give out such information? He has given out other such information in his 3 posts.

Seems there are few people here that think everyone have an agenda where ANS is concerned.
He hasn't given out 'other such information'. I would imagine any organisation would consider that information to be 'of a sensitive nature', so to encourage a junior (sorry DanJaws I may be judging you here) member of staff to publish is somewhat inappropriate.
handleturning is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 10:13
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Surrey
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by handleturning View Post
He hasn't given out 'other such information'. I would imagine any organisation would consider that information to be 'of a sensitive nature', so to encourage a junior (sorry DanJaws I may be judging you here) member of staff to publish is somewhat inappropriate.
Apology not needed! Although I’ve not been called junior for a while, haha! As I said before, percentage wise the rate is said to be similar to NATS.

As you say, I’m not sure what people’s problem is with competition, I can only see it as a good thing for ATC in the UK.

Last edited by DanJaws; 25th Jul 2019 at 14:43.
DanJaws is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 16:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: HANTS
Posts: 190
The way ANS are handling LGW can only be seen as a great thing for NATS. It wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if the contract comes back their way either at renewal or even possibly before.
GAPSTER is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 16:28
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: N/A
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by handleturning View Post
I would imagine any organisation would consider that information to be 'of a sensitive nature', so to encourage a junior (sorry DanJaws I may be judging you here) member of staff to publish is somewhat inappropriate.
Sensitive being a very appropriate word to describe your response to what was an innocent query.

Perhaps DanJaws or indeed anyone less sensitive than handleturning, could divulge what the success, failure or resignation rate was when NATS ran Gatwick? Or is this the nations top secret.

Last edited by Rwy1234; 25th Jul 2019 at 16:39.
Rwy1234 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 16:41
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 52
Originally Posted by Rwy1234 View Post
Perhaps DanJaws or indeed anyone less sensitive than handleturning, could divulge what the success, failure or resignation rate was when NATS ran Gatwick? Or is this the nationals top secret.
Perhaps danJawes doesn't know the answer?
Perhaps it's not accessible information?
Perhaps nobody else on here cares?

I haven't been to gatters for a few years but keep in touch with some who are still there - and the numbers are slightly lower under the new lot. Perhaps one dan jaws can answer - what is the general moral like? There were some right characters there back in the day who were the typical "don't need to learn your name because you won't validate" type. I never got involved in training but some of the new fish from the training college were treated was pretty poorly.
Packer27L is online now  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 17:27
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 315
One of the threads at the time of the original takeover in 2016 stated they had recruited ATCOs from such airports as Cambridge. Word on the street is there have been far more resignations than validations. Can anyone confirm?
T250 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2019, 18:42
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Well.. Nats applications are now closed so the dilemma is over
mike current is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2019, 04:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: N/A
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by T250 View Post
One of the threads at the time of the original takeover in 2016 stated they had recruited ATCOs from such airports as Cambridge. Word on the street is there have been far more resignations than validations. Can anyone confirm?
A question some posters here (likely to be ANS Managers) have said is to be “sensitive information” so will likely attempt to prevent answer again.

IMHO this is a fair question, I don’t understand why it would be sensitive. I wonder if the question has been asked by candidates at interview or if it was too “sensitive” to answer.
Rwy1234 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2019, 06:35
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3
It is sensitive, but only because the validation rate has been low (reportedly from very good sources) and the resignation rate higher than you’d expect. Consequently, ATCOs are having to work full shifts and moral is low (reportedly from very good sources ��)
Landingtime25 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2019, 08:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: uk
Age: 54
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by Rwy1234 View Post


A question some posters here (likely to be ANS Managers) have said is to be “sensitive information” so will likely attempt to prevent answer again.

IMHO this is a fair question, I don’t understand why it would be sensitive. I wonder if the question has been asked by candidates at interview or if it was too “sensitive” to answer.
I think you've answered your own question. There's a difference between asking such a question at interview (a genuine question, borne out of a professional desire to understand career prospects) and expecting it to be put on the internet. DO you genuinely not understand that the success rate of controller validation, in such a competitive recruitment market, is a very sensitive number?
handleturning is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2019, 13:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: uk
Age: 54
Posts: 70
Originally Posted by GAPSTER View Post
The way ANS are handling LGW can only be seen as a great thing for NATS. It wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest if the contract comes back their way either at renewal or even possibly before.
Maybe ANS should bid to run Swanwick

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49122644
handleturning is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2019, 18:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: River Thames & Surrey
Age: 70
Posts: 8,081
Originally Posted by handleturning View Post
Maybe ANS should bid to run Swanwick

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49122644
Different company; NERL runs LACC at Swanwick, NSL runs the airport and APS side.
chevvron is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 09:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Wherever someone will pay me to do fun stuff
Posts: 1,060
I have little knowledge of the Gatwick operation today so cannot offer any insight or answers to the questions that some feel need to be asked.

BUT, I started off a career in ATC some 40+ years ago. I was a NATS cadet (for those that care) and got posted to an aerodrome which was known as a cadets' graveyard and, before too long, joined the many before me that got chopped. To an extent, it was a case of if your face didn't fit you were not going to make it through the training. In fairness though, I did not perform well and now can see some of the reasons for this. There was undoubtedly a culture which made successful completion of the training contingent upon getting (sometimes struggling) over a number of hurdles, with little help from the unit as a whole.

Despite this setback, I was able to gain a licence with all the ratings for an aerodrome and went on to work fairly successfully at a number of airports around the UK for the best part of 20 years. I note as a matter of interest for those less familiar with the system that this would be impossible today. Later I worked in a wide range of other roles, including, strangely enough, training, but all still connected with ATC and aviation. I have seen concepts such as 'Train for success' rather than failure being tried and promoted, and lots of changes to training systems for ATC and other disciplines....but still failure rates are high. I was not alone in failing to complete the NATS but subsequently going on to a successful career as a controller and it is worth pondering why, with all of the resources and expertise that NATS had, it could not reap a return on its investment in my training. I don't know if ANS faces the same challenges but, assuming its staff were in part, at least, inherited from NATS, I guess the culture of that organisation may also have been inherited.

What I find quite stunning is to read in this thread that the attitudes of some of those in ATC is little changed after 40 years. And that some people feel able to support it, or at least, content with it. Some of the people I started off with are now managers (or recently retired managers), and it seems that they chose, or were unable to, do anything to change things. Perhaps its a case of 'I went through it and it never did me any harm', but surely someone, somewhere at the right level recognises that this culture is not good - and, more importantly to a manager, inefficient. That is not so suggest that everyone who starts training should ultimately go on to hold a licence, or be able to hold a C of C at Gatwick, but the failure rates that are suggested to exist surely could be reduced.

I could go on - or even suggest what could be at the root of today's problems - but I won't bore you!
LookingForAJob is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 09:32
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by chevvron View Post
and when we were at 4 miles (the previous lander just vacating), they still managed to get 2 departures away before we were cleared to land.
Hopefully this skill has been carried over to ANS controllers.
Skill? I would argue this is quite the opposite. The only way this would be skilful (and I use the term very loosely) is if the two ahead are helicopters or light GA. I control at a busy London airport and I can tell you now this type of controlling is neither encouraged nor trained.

As for ANS....... watch this summer I think.
Flying184 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2019, 09:41
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by LookingForAJob View Post

still failure rates are high.
This is because the training styles and learning employed in the ATC world are still stuck in the 1950's.... I mean rote learning lists from MATS1 at the college?! And then at unit being plugged in and training OTJ regardless of what comes along on the frequency. Bonkers. I liken it to being a brand new learner driver, and on your first lesson being told we are going to drive on the motorway, do clutch control, mirrors, indicating, roundabouts etc etc but don't worry i'll help you along the way. The effect is sensory overload, workload saturation, stress etc which do not result in learning or skill development. People make the grade because they are, in many cases, dragged across the line and those who are chopped are often because they have fallen victim to training methods not fit for purpose in such a modern industry.

A more modern, structured, approach to learning is much needed with better use of technology available to make the whole OJT learning process more effective, developmental and incremental.

Kudos to you though for sticking with it and having a great career

Flying184 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2019, 02:45
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: River Thames & Surrey
Age: 70
Posts: 8,081
Originally Posted by Flying184 View Post
This is because the training styles and learning employed in the ATC world are still stuck in the 1950's.... I mean rote learning lists from MATS1 at the college?! And then at unit being plugged in and training OTJ regardless of what comes along on the frequency. Bonkers. I liken it to being a brand new learner driver, and on your first lesson being told we are going to drive on the motorway, do clutch control, mirrors, indicating, roundabouts etc etc but don't worry i'll help you along the way. The effect is sensory overload, workload saturation, stress etc which do not result in learning or skill development. People make the grade because they are, in many cases, dragged across the line and those who are chopped are often because they have fallen victim to training methods not fit for purpose in such a modern industry.

A more modern, structured, approach to learning is much needed with better use of technology available to make the whole OJT learning process more effective, developmental and incremental.

Kudos to you though for sticking with it and having a great career
Our UTP required the mentor to take over when traffic got to certain levels, depending on how much training the U/T had carried out. I assume this is 'standard' for UTP at all NATS units.
chevvron is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2019, 14:15
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by chevvron View Post
Our UTP required the mentor to take over when traffic got to certain levels, depending on how much training the U/T had carried out. I assume this is 'standard' for UTP at all NATS units.
Absolutely! I would say (hope) standard for any OJTI regardless of ANSP or unit!

My point was merely in relation to the way in which training is conducted as an industry, not specific to any unit, ANSP, college etc. Just feels very archaic compared to the way in which pilot training is conducted, but that is just my opinion.

Flying184 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.