Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Logging times in ATC

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Logging times in ATC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd May 2018 | 21:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: On top of the world
Logging times in ATC

A thread about Oceanic time margins made me think about how UK units log movements. I thought I recalled the method @ EGLL in the early 70's was that the minute ran from 35 seconds before to 34 seconds after for landing times etc. but I've also seen it quoted as 31 before to 30 after. Anyone have a definitive answer for what they do at their unit nowadays ?
off watch is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd May 2018 | 22:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Rapunzel's tower
Originally Posted by off watch
A thread about Oceanic time margins made me think about how UK units log movements. I thought I recalled the method @ EGLL in the early 70's was that the minute ran from 35 seconds before to 34 seconds after for landing times etc. but I've also seen it quoted as 31 before to 30 after. Anyone have a definitive answer for what they do at their unit nowadays ?
At my unit 1300 runs from 12:59:30 until 13:00:29.
good egg is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd May 2018 | 22:59
  #3 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 215
From: SA
are we talking minutes or half minutes?
sunnySA is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2018 | 05:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
The thread about Oceanic time margins actually quotes the ICAO Annex 11 rule (albeit with an incorrect reference half way through the tread) regarding how all units should log movements with regards to time.
Packer27L is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2018 | 17:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: On top of the world
Thanks people.
sunnySA, I was thinking in terms of minutes, as used on Flight Progress strips & in Movemenents Logs, not for separation etc.
off watch is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2018 | 18:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
Places I've worked the minute changed at 30 seconds..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2018 | 18:58
  #7 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,718
Likes: 2,083
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by HEATHROW DIRECTOR
Places I've worked the minute changed at 30 seconds..
In other words, logging times to the nearest minute. That sounds entirely logical.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2018 | 20:22
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
From: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
This is interesting.

When I did ADC, I can't remember writing TO/Landing times on our FPS like that.

I'm fairly certain if the 'event' happened at 10:35:43. on out 'TIMEON' Digital Clock, it was written as 1035.

Having said that, it was a long time ago.
ZOOKER is offline  
Reply
Old 24th May 2018 | 21:25
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 2
From: MANCHESTER
Not any more, after electronic strip displays minute is from 00-59.
seahawks is offline  
Reply
Old 25th May 2018 | 07:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by seahawks
Not any more, after electronic strip displays minute is from 00-59.
That may be what EFPS displays, but the rules haven’t changed. An airborne time of 15:33:41 should be treated as 15:34 for every purpose other than wake turbulence timing.
Packer27L is offline  
Reply
Old 25th May 2018 | 08:59
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, England
I recall in the good old days pre-automation, that the airborne time recorded was manipulated to match slot tolerance.
brianj is offline  
Reply
Old 25th May 2018 | 10:36
  #12 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 712
Likes: 17
From: SE England
and if you forgot to do it the kindly assistant would edit the movement log to show a more correct time
Dan Dare is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2018 | 07:20
  #13 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 309
Likes: 4
From: Living In The Past
@ Dan Dare - Mrs Cartman concurs. I read her your post & instant response was "yes - wouldn't be the first time I did that!" :-)
Eric T Cartman is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2018 | 15:02
  #14 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 5
From: South of England
...but the rules haven’t changed. An airborne time of 15:33:41 should be treated as 15:34 for every purpose other than wake turbulence timing
Packer27L - to which rules are you referring?

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2018 | 20:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by 2 sheds
Packer27L - to which rules are you referring?

2 s
See, now I’m stumped and feel like a chump. Can’t find it written down anywhere. But I shall continue to search...and perhaps temporarily redefine my memory of the ‘ATC minute’ to match that of the man on the streets’.
Packer27L is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2018 | 21:38
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,266
Likes: 1
From: Berkshire, UK
Time is a variable! We used 3 mins between DVR deps on westerlies and when it was busy I rang the bloke on TMA(SE) and asked for 2 mins between 2 DVRs and he said "2 mins approved but make sure there is 60 seconds in each one!"

Last edited by HEATHROW DIRECTOR; 5th August 2018 at 12:24.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Reply
Old 13th July 2018 | 10:53
  #17 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,456
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by HEATHROW DIRECTOR
"2 mins approved but make sure there is 60 minutes in each one!"
I hope that's a typo and you intended to say '60 seconds'.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 5th August 2018 | 10:45
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 5
From: South of England
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2 sheds
Packer27L - to which rules are you referring?
2 s

See, now I’m stumped and feel like a chump. Can’t find it written down anywhere. But I shall continue to search...and perhaps temporarily redefine my memory of the ‘ATC minute’ to match that of the man on the streets’.
Quite so, In the absence of anyone quoting a definitive reference, I cannot help feeling that it is just an illogical "custom and practice". We are considering a clock indication which registers elapsed time - to my mind, the seconds should be ignored if the requirement is to record only (hour and) minutes. If your age is 37 years and seven months, you would not say that you were 38.

​​​​​​​2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.