Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Is a Pan an emergency?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Is a Pan an emergency?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Jan 2010, 03:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is a Pan an emergency?

The definition I have of emergencies groups them into 2 categories: Urgency (PAN) and Distress (MAY DAY).

However, it seems to be that declaring an emergency is synonomous with calling MAY DAY. So....is a PAN call an emergency? In this case is it appropriate to squawk 7700 after calling PAN PAN (for instance on a single engine drift-down)?
Woof etc is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 06:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, both MAYDAY and PAN PAN are classed as Emergency calls.

It was covered recently, here ...

HTH

JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 06:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One thing I've always wondered (since this thread is here), is what you'd call in this scenario.

Imagine you're in a C172 or equivalent, with a few passengers. You have complete engine failure, but there's a lovely big field below you and you're perfectly happy to do a completely normal and safe landing. Am I right in saying that's a pan?
Skittles is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 07:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since you ask, no - that is a MAYDAY and is clearly "Distress" as it involves a total loss of engine power. It would not be a "completely normal and safe landing" that you would accomplish in those circumstances.

However, there will be other considerations as to whether you actually transmit a MAYDAY, in particular whether you are in current contact with an ATSU at the time and whether you actually have time (height) to do so while sorting out the reason for the failure and planning the forced landing.


JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 08:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: An ATC centre this side of the moon.
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If in any doubt I would suggest dont hesitate and call Mayday!!...its amazing how that single word concentrates the mind of the Controller or in my case FISO....at the end of the day you can always down grade to a Pan if required but if in doubt...SHOUT !!!!!!!
fisbangwollop is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 09:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: England
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fishbangwallop am I right in saying that doesn't apply when you just want priority in the circuit?

"MAYDAY MAYDAY - I'M MISSING THE FOOTBALL"
Skittles is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 11:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Pan call is an emergency.We always squawk 7700 as it alerts other sectors that you have an aircraft with a problem,which could develop into a Distress situation.
It alerts D&D and they can start taking their action.It can alert the Tower,so that they can call out the emergency services .
Sometimes you don't get a lot of notice.I had twin turboprop that had an engine failure on 8 mile final and called Pan.Squawked it 7700 and everyone took a lot of notice very quickly.
It's interesting that the poster is in Hong Kong.I seem to remember discussion about this subject when working there,that a Pan call was not classified as an emergency.Wouldn't surprise me.
throw a dyce is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 13:53
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input gents.

From an ATC perspective: Should an aircraft declaring a PAN squawk 7700 or maintain the assigned squawk?
Woof etc is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2010, 15:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fife.UK.married,2 kids
Age: 75
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my opinion squawk 7700 every time for a PAN. The appropriate services can always ask you to change it but if you don't and things get worse you might not be able to select it. This is reflected in many local instructions to ATCOs which require that the pilot is told to squwrk 7700 if not already doing so.
Hyperborean is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2010, 12:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on what the PAN is and what you plan to do in my airspace. If its a big turn around through several sectors, military areas or close to an FIR boundary then I'd ask for 7700. If you are inbound, not changing route or destination with a sick pax, then I wouldn't bother.
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2010, 21:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: In the sun
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To the C172 pilot, call Mayday. Your lovely green field might have potholes, fences etc unseen from the air and you are forced to land in it. If you suddenly see an obstruction, going round isn't an option.
WetFeet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.