Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Visual separation in ACC

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Visual separation in ACC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jul 2009, 03:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: BeiJing ,China
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Visual separation in ACC

I just do not know why not use visual separation in ACC ? Is that because of the speed is much faster than APP ?
caucatc is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 03:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,415
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
By ACC, I assume you mean Class A airspace--positive control is the answer. Only radar or procedural separation allowed in Class A, no visual.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 05:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 538
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd call sighted and passed visual separation in class A.
topdrop is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 07:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By ACC he means area control. And it can be used (and is), not only in topdrop's example.
criss is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 08:40
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not in UK Class A methinks......
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 10:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why not?

Simple, mis-identification and the amount of RTF needed as both pilots must comply. There are a few nationalities I wouldn't even consider asking due to misunderstandings too.

The mis-idents can come from something as simple as BMI aircraft flying using Lufthansa callsigns - as ATC we do not know if the aircraft we are speaking to is actually owned or even painted up in the callsign colours. I know we don't have to pass operator just aircraft type, but if you heard me call a Lufthansa requesting for you to visually climb through and then you noticed it was a BMI craft, you would feel uneasy and possibly question whether you are climbing through the correct aircraft's level. Too dangerous and negates us actually having radar and in the UK as many sectors have lots of climbing/descending aircraft in close proximity it just wouldn't work.
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 10:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the world
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are we talking about VMC Climb and Descent and what class of Airspace does the originator refer to?
Dizzee Rascal is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2009, 10:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Golden Road to Samarkand
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting... Visual Separation is banned from use in all classes of airspace in the FIR I'm currently working... including Class A.

No Visual Sighting & Passing allowed... RADAR or DME only.
Quokka is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2009, 18:18
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
caucatc

Another relevant factor in UK airspace is that the SMF [a computerised separation monitor] does not know the difference between a visual separation and a loss of Radar separation. If we lose 5 miles/1000 feet, or whatever separation is required in a particular piece of sky...it can be more in some London ACC airspace, it will flag up on the supervisor's desk; instant suspension results. Even after a positive pass of opposite direction flights, re-inforced by both pilots' visual confirmation, climb/descent is forbidden until the required Radar separation is achieved.
055166k is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 12:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<In the UK, particularly in TMA airspace, it was an acceptable technique in the early eighties to expedite >>

Are you sure? I was there in the 80s... and 70s.. and don't recall ever being able to use VMC climbs/descents in Class A TMA airspace..
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 13:47
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was one of the caveats for a VMC climb/descent not Where radar is NOT available.....or have I forgotten the original definition?
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2009, 16:24
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eastern wiseguy is correct, according to my understanding,... although the CAA prefers to use the term 'ATS Surveillance System' now .
windneckin is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2009, 19:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Germany
Age: 59
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In our UAC VMC climbs/descents were banned, since pilots have to follow the TCAS resolution advisory regardless of the clearance issued by the controller.
Schlumbumba is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2009, 13:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just wanted to say the same ^^^^^^^
what would you do during the visual climb-out or descent and you get the advisory? besides, I think that visual separation on-route is not allowed worldwide.
kontrolor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.