Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

protecting a/ways from military?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

protecting a/ways from military?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2007, 09:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
protecting a/ways from military?

Folks a very basic question but i'd love to know. With the increase in Russian Airforce presence snooping around how do you protect your airways from incursions?. I was reading two GR 4s were scrabbled from Scotland on a intercept. Do these bears just turn up with no warning, (naturally no flight plan) and its all hands on deck with you guys vectoring etc. Or do they purposely stay away from civil airspace?
Bearcat is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 12:25
  #2 (permalink)  
NeoDude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
GR4s? Seems a bit strange sending a ground attack aircraft to intercept aircraft. Are you sure it wasn't F3s?
 
Old 7th Sep 2007, 12:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Surrey, UK ;
Age: 71
Posts: 1,155
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
There is already a thread running on this subject and I think the answer given there is is that provided they remain in international airspace, they can pretty much do what they want - but with both their radar to protect them from ramming into a transatlantic Jumbo and (at least in the area where they are probing our defences) and ground based radar that can spot them at FL 360 there is no real danger.

"Without warning" is not the case as somebody will have been tracking them since they rounded the North Cape .. a good 2 hours flight away from our airspace.

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...ht=bear&page=7

This long running - but with a load of recent posts- thread has responses from those far more knowledgeable than I.

DGG

Last edited by Dave Gittins; 7th Sep 2007 at 12:36. Reason: Found the Thread on "Military"
Dave Gittins is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 14:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember LATCC Mil requesting coordination on a Bear being escorted by F-4s during the 80s!
Magic Mushroom is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 15:01
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everyone gets out of the way for QRA. It's great
danieloakworth is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 16:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or do they purposely stay away from civil airspace?
No
M609 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 18:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MARS
Posts: 1,102
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Or do they purposely stay away from civil airspace?
There is no such thing in Europe!
Widger is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 20:36
  #8 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Widger
There is no such thing in Europe!
CAS is not civil airspace? Hhhmmm, I would beg to differ. Not that I'm suggesting that uncontrolled Airspace is 'military', its not, but CAS is (IMHO of course) very firmly civil airspace. Hence approved military units having to ask for a Cleared Flight Path or 'take 5' through CAS and all other remain clear.

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2007, 22:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No BDiONU, all airspace is military. By agreement we allow the civvies to use certain specified routes without the need for individual coordination. [Provided they maintain within 5NM of those routes and maintain FL450 or below, of course]
Hippy is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2007, 08:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Swanwick
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I remember LATCC Mil requesting coordination on a Bear being escorted by F-4s during the 80s!"



Wow! LATCC (Mil) mistakenly requested co-ordination in the 1980s...lets bring it up 20 years later shall we

DD
Diddley Dee is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2007, 13:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Somewhere in England!
Age: 67
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow! LATCC (Mil) mistakenly requested co-ordination in the 1980s...lets bring it up 20 years later shall we
Sounds like my wife!!
Pie
Pie Man is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2007, 16:04
  #12 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Hippy
No BDiONU, all airspace is military. By agreement we allow the civvies to use certain specified routes without the need for individual coordination. [Provided they maintain within 5NM of those routes and maintain FL450 or below, of course]
I'm not sure whether I'm being suckered in here but I'm a little doubtful about the basis for this statement. I have a feeling that the UK (and 180 or so other States) have signed up to the Chicago Convention. This appears to place a number of obligations on the State, just as military agreements will do. At national level it is necessary to carve up access to airspace and other arrangements that enable these obligations to be met. I have always understood that this is done by agreement between the relevant ministers but with the proviso that the Minister for Defence can play a trump card in times of war etc. But I'm not familiar with the concept that fundamentally it's either military or civil airspace.

But please put me right if you have a relevant reference.
 
Old 8th Sep 2007, 16:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but CAS is (IMHO of course) very firmly civil airspace.
I might be wrong, but I belive UK is the only country in the more civilized parts of the world not to protect their bases terminal area with some CAS.

And the Russians do not respect or adhere to reg regarding CAS, it's all due regard.

For the airline pilots out there, it's also a strong rumor going, that the Russian air force is flying in the blind spot of commercial aircraft, trying to hide from NATO EW radars. Cheeky bas*****......
M609 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2007, 20:08
  #14 (permalink)  
aceatco, retired
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: one airshow or another
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Send 'em a Eurocontrol bill, that'll put a stop to it

Hope we get a Bear or two at next year's RIAT
vintage ATCO is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2007, 10:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: wherever will have me
Posts: 748
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that Widger meant that the airspace is neither civil, or military. The airspace is a national resource and is managed by both the civil and military agencies. We have an established en-route structure to facilitate civil aircraft movements, controlled by civil air traffic controllers. Military ATCOs control throughout UK airspace, with the onus on the military to take 5 and coordinate passage with civil ATCOs due to the flexibility inherent in military ops compared to civil en-route traffic. At the end of the day however, we all (generally) work to the same set of rules to maintain safe and efficient flight.
whowhenwhy is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2007, 12:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lincs
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow! LATCC (Mil) mistakenly requested co-ordination in the 1980s...lets bring it up 20 years later shall we
Strewth DD, not too hot on the old banter are we!! Can I have my fishing rod, and boat back please?!

Last edited by Magic Mushroom; 9th Sep 2007 at 13:07.
Magic Mushroom is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2007, 16:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All airspace is military? Where does that particular 'gem' originate? By the way, Concorde operated above FL450... well above...
Minesapint is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2007, 18:17
  #18 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Minesapint
All airspace is military? Where does that particular 'gem' originate? By the way, Concorde operated above FL450... well above...
Switch your banter level up to stun Mr Pint

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 16:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London FIR
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way, Concorde operated above FL450... well above...
and the military have nothing that high?? I'll wager that, at times, they have traffic higher. I've certainly assisted a controller working a track at FL500 in the descent! (took bloody ages too... coffee went cold!)


At the end of the day it gets dark... we all get paid... and we all share the airspace :-)

One BIG happy family
Monkey Madness is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2007, 18:35
  #20 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Monkey Madness
and the military have nothing that high?? I'll wager that, at times, they have traffic higher. I've certainly assisted a controller working a track at FL500 in the descent! (took bloody ages too... coffee went cold!)
Obviously wasn't a Tornado F3 then From the height & speed sounds like one of those ssshhh, Mums the word, American 'reconnaissance' flights.

BD
BDiONU is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.