Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

"Cleared to Land..."

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

"Cleared to Land..."

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th August 2001 | 19:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: MSP
Exclamation "Cleared to Land..."

Hi ATC Guys and Gals...

I was landing in KCAK (AKRON, OH, USA), and the tower controller cleared us to land...thats it. There are several runways at CAK and it can be confusing. I asked the controller which runway we where cleared for and he came back with the response, "Well which runway did approach clear you for?" I came back, "It shouldn't matter, tell us anyway!!!"
My question, is there any thing that Tower controllers are supposed to say as far as cleared to land on runway 5 or just cleared to land? I didn't want to make this an issue but what if there had been a 5L/R? Our company has had problems here before...
Gulf227 is offline  
Old 11th August 2001 | 20:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
From: Anywhere
Post

UK Phraseology is "Cleared to land Rwy...., surface wind is......." and I thought this was pretty much standard throughout the world as far as civil phraseology is concerned. The only time I know where the runway is not given is UK military phraseology. Maybe Scott Voight will give a definitive answer on this as far as the US is concerned?

CM
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 12th August 2001 | 01:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: London
Post

I think the US phraseology is to give the runway before the instruction:

'Callsign, Runway 22L, Cleared to land'

Might be wrong though.

Scott.....


AI
Aluminium Importer is offline  
Old 12th August 2001 | 06:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Cool

Hi Y'all;

I had to go back and check... If you have been cleared for an approach to a runway or there is only one active runway being published, then it is not needed to state the runway again...

from the book....

3-10-5 Landing Clearance
a. Issue landing clearance. Restate the landing runway whenever more than one runway is active, or an instrument approach is being conducted to a closed runway.
PHRASEOLOGY -
CLEARED TO LAND,
or
RUNWAY (designator) CLEARED TO LAND.
b. "USN NOT APPLICABLE." Inform the closest aircraft that is cleared to land, touch-and-go, stop-and-go, or unrestricted low approaches when there is traffic holding on the same runway.
EXAMPLE -
"Delta one, cleared to land. Traffic holding in position."
or
"Delta one, runway one eight, cleared to land. Traffic holding in position."
c. USA/USAF/USN. Issue surface wind when clearing an aircraft to land, touch-and-go, stop-and-go, low approach, or the option. Restate the landing runway whenever there is a possibility of a conflict with another aircraft which is using or is planning to use another runway.
PHRASEOLOGY -
WIND (surface wind direction and velocity), CLEARED TO LAND,
or
WIND (surface wind direction and velocity), RUNWAY (designator) CLEARED TO LAND.
NOTE -
A clearance to land means that appropriate separation on the landing runway will be ensured. A landing clearance does not relieve the pilot from compliance with any previously issued restriction.

regards
Scott Voigt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.