Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Abu Dhabi Contract - Serco or NATS?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Abu Dhabi Contract - Serco or NATS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jun 2004, 09:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote -

We have not yet been advised that we have won the contract to run ATC in Abu Dhabi although we believe we are in a strong position. When further details are available on any of these matters we will let you know.
Minesapint is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2004, 17:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OFFICIAL N LATEST


SERCO HAVE BEEN GRANTED THE CONTRACT TODAY.

END OF STORY ATC GLORY !!!
SpehricXxX is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2004, 02:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere beyond the sea
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't like to say I but we told you so but!

In the end NATS got away lightly as they would have not been able to deliver anything different from SERCO without making a loss.

I'm sure NATS will try again with another SERCO overseas contract but this time they won't be wearing the rosey colored lenses.
clipped_wings is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2004, 08:39
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: on the move again...
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone able to confirm/deny the above claim?
What's the source for the above?
From NATS, Serco, or from the DCA itself?
Any announcements?
Zones is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2004, 09:15
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've searched everything I can think of on the www from the DCA website, Serco's own website, the Middle East News agancies and I can't find anything related to a contract award for Abu Dhabi anywhere on the Net.

I would have thought that Serco would have been blowing their own trumpet and announcing this as soon as they could after the contract award.
caniplaywithmadness is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2004, 09:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NATS were quick enough to inform its staff that they didn't win the contract.

By the language used in the statement, they are mightily pi55ed off too. They mention that the NATS bid was definitely cheaper than SERCO's
VectorLine is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2004, 09:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: behind the drag curve
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Hey vectorline, any chance you can post here what NATS said?
Legs11 is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2004, 10:38
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: London
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the NATS Intranet

“I am sorry to tell you that we have been advised that NATS (Services) Ltd (NSL) has been unsuccessful in winning the contract to provide air traffic and associated services at Abu Dhabi and Al Ain International Airports...
“The Abu Dhabi Executive Council has retained Serco to manage those operations at these airports for a further period of five years.

“We are obviously disappointed by this decision. Our bid was the cheapest and, we believe, met the requirements of the Department of Civil Aviation and airspace users in the region.

“We are working to better understand the reasons behind the decision. An appeal may be possible. In the meantime, I would like to acknowledge the efforts of the team from Business Development, Airports and Legal, who have been working hard to secure this major overseas operational contract.

“Those efforts are continuing and we are vigorously pursuing other opportunities.”

Hugh Westaway
Director Strategy & Regulation
Mr Chips is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2004, 14:37
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, understand that those of us at this end have heard nothing.

Secondly, understand that those of us at this end TOLD YOU OVER AND OVER that NATS and many of the posters on the subject on this forum HAD NFI.

I mean, how stupid can you be? Thales went thru EXACTLY the same exercise 3 years ago, underbid, thought they had it right up until the day Serco signed. Business is conducted VERY DIFFERENTLY out here. Contenders for the contract are really just bludgeons to get Serco's price down. If organisations want to come over and piss away money on a bid- go ahead. The only winner is the DCA.
ferris is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2004, 21:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why? Because I was right? So much for having no clue. A few others might need to look in the mirror in that respect, don't you think?
What's really eating you? The prospect of 3 more years under Seth? If you didn't see it coming, you're an even bigger fool than evidenced by your posts.
Dreams of working for NATS dashed? As if 'NATS M.E.' would've been anything like NATS!
ferris is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2004, 05:47
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 24 27 45.66N 54 22 42.28E
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyway.... congratulations to SERCO, and I am glad it is finally sorted out, either way. At least now the poor people actually working here can get back to doing their job and not worrying about all this rubbish. Also a couple of other things that have been on hold while this was being sorted, can happen. Yeeha!
AirNoServicesAustralia is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2004, 08:02
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But there no reason to shoot people down for hoping
Then don't dish it out. At least we now know your motivation. And I can only sympathise ( everyone in the ME knows Seth is a plonker )- the irony would've been NATS M.E. winning the contract and then getting Seth (or a clone) to run it!
if you're so f****** clever why didn't you establish a company yourself? Try to win the next contract?
If I thought I had a ghost of a chance- I might. As long as someone else puts up the money for the bid costs
ferris is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2004, 22:38
  #33 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I first joined IAL many many moons ago, their company ethos with regard to "overseas" contracts was that they would "establish and retain an overseas contract until such time that the contracting authority was satisfied that the facility could be run by their own national staff".

I think that someone, is pulling (all be it very successfully), someone elses plonker.

All the best to the folks on the coal face.
niknak is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2004, 10:11
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: in the pub
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

If you think the present contract manager is a "plonker", then you must consider that you are capable of doing a better job. If so, you should be out front trying to get things done openly, and pulling everyone else along with you, instead of hiding behind a forum. But then I guess you are too negative to be a leader...
5tattoo is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2004, 15:55
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope you guys in the UAE are thinking about danger money from Serco,the way things are in Saudi lately.Just a matter of time before attacks spread unfortunately.I'd think more than twice now,Nats or Serco
throw a dyce is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2004, 16:20
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 24 27 45.66N 54 22 42.28E
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand you feeling the way you do throw a dyce but having been here 2 years, while being cautious, I have a great deal of faith in the safety and security of the UAE. I am not saying that nothing will ever happen here, but why someone would feel safer in London than in Dubai or Abu Dhabi confuses me. The bombs in Spain and Bali and the 9/11 attacks prove terrorism will strike anywhere. So while terrorist attacks could happen here, just as they can anywhere in the world, I don't have to worry about personal security, eg. Burglary, mugging, Car theft etc. I won't say no to danger money if SERCO are offering but I certainly don't think it is neccessary.
AirNoServicesAustralia is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2004, 19:23
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bwahahahaha.......

It's not just me who thinks he's a plonker. I don't know anyone who DOESN'T think he's a plonker. But I digress....
If so, you should be out front trying to get things done openly, and pulling everyone else along with you,
How, exactly, does one get to BE out the front? Oh, that's right... in the fine tradition of being tapped on the shoulder!!! The whole system is just a model of openness and honesty, right?
But then I guess you are too negative to be a leader
No, just the years of being beaten into submission having the desired effect.
Bullying, as a leadership style, went out in the 60's. Still very much de rigeur around these parts.

A leader......bwahahahhaa.

As for danger money- just wait until the first 'incident', ANSA.
ferris is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2004, 04:53
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 24 27 45.66N 54 22 42.28E
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree Ferris that it only takes the one "incident" to send everyone scurrying but the attitude of the UK guys makes me laugh. When they were sure NATS was going to get the contract, it was all about getting their suncream out, and how they were going to change the world out here. Now NATS has missed out (as a few of us consistently told them was going to happen), they bring out the old chestnut, "well I don't think i'd want to be their anyway...with all that terrorism and stuff". Closest I have seen to terrorism in 2 years here is a local doing 200kmh in his BMW X5, and I'll tell you that terrorises me sometimes.
AirNoServicesAustralia is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2004, 06:56
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Gulf
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the NATS Intranet:

“We are obviously disappointed by this decision. Our bid was the cheapest and, we believe, met the requirements of the Department of Civil Aviation and airspace users in the region.

“We are working to better understand the reasons behind the decision. An appeal may be possible.
After reading that I thought, how incredibly arrogant.
You can just picture a NATS suit somewhere, foaming at the mouth and screaming: This is preposterous!! Don't they know who we are??!!

Red Dragon is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2004, 07:53
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: On the border...
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How, exactly, does one get to BE out the front? Oh, that's right... in the fine tradition of being tapped on the shoulder!!! The whole system is just a model of openness and honesty, right?
SERCo openess "Our door is always open !"


---problem being there is never anybody in the office
African Queen is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.