Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

MACC to the Four Winds

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

MACC to the Four Winds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2004, 04:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MACC to the Four Winds

As this is an anonymous forum how about some MACC guys giving their opinions on the way in which our unit has been handled. Not a topic for having a go at other units as they have their own problems. Just us...telling it like it is. Maybe about the splitting of the unit, the moves to Canada, Middle East opportunities or any other MACC specific input from MACC people. If you're moving on, planning to, effects, one to one gems; before we all go our seperate ways.

And by the way, for other units, feel free to join in...whatever you feel about us we all do the same job with our hands tied behind our backs by "the management". For once put the gripes away, observe and comment on what is happening to us and what we're doing about it. In the hope it never happens to your units and friends.
Mahaba is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 07:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Costa del Hampshire
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mahaba –

Quote:”For once put the gripes away, observe and comment on what is happening to us..”

Reply: You are being shafted

Quote:” and what we're doing about it.”

Reply: Nothing

Sorry, but that’s how it looks from here.
Connex is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 07:37
  #3 (permalink)  

Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think some of my colleagues are doing something about it actually - they're leaving for pastures new. Voting with their feet if you like

In fact - scrub the word "some" and insert the words "many" - sadly.

I don't especially blame the management at MACC who are good sorts and of course not the people who are going - I just think it's a natural human reaction to leave when you're being transferred to another unit you either don't want to - or can't - go to.

Of course - some of it comes down to personal choice too (see my much missed fellow PPRuNer "cossack"). It's not all just about NPC - it's just the whole NavCanada thing has happened at a rather opportune time for some who felt their hands were being forced somewhat.

With regard to the pay issue I think I can confidently say that the large majority of union members at MACC will be voting a firm "no" to the proposed deal - probably the ATSAs too. Whether that will have any impact on overall acceptance or not I'm not sure.

There are an awful lot of people at LACC, TC and CATC when it comes to a ballot.
bagpuss lives is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 09:23
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it unbelievable that Prospect can see fit to put to the members that they think they represent any deal that splits NATS staff down the middle. This whole ploy is a deliberate attempt by management to try to put MACC and SCATCC against LACC and by the sheer numbers at LACC they think they can set up the whole devide and rule scenario. How on earth Prospect have been dumb enough to not see through this is beyond belief. Come on you Prospect reps...deny all this, you know you can't.
As for the ATSAs voting against the deal, well I hope they all do. I also hope we give PCS a mandate for strike action for one reason only. At the moment, management feel they can get away with murder, if we had just one day strike I firmly believe that they would sit up and take notice. I'm not convinced it will make any difference to this years deal but if management knew that we were prepared to use strike action then the unions hands would not be quite so tied down when it came to future negotiations.
As for the ATCO's, you have them over a barrel, stop the training, stop the aava's and the fines imposed on NATS because of the subsequent delays would far outweigh the decent payrise that you have been promised for years.
ATCO's, for once vote with your feet, this deal is an INSULT to all MACC controllers.
And as a footnote to all you others in NATS, look at this as a really serious comment. If you go down this route you will be picked off one at a time. Stick together, it's the only way, please vote no to this pathetic offer.
White Rose is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 11:34
  #5 (permalink)  

Watchdog Delta Hotel
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: here but there in 6 years
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have to be honest on this topic

i will go to npc
reason being i never wanted to be at manch in the first place (stitched at an early date)
however it's a great place to work and the people are good to work with. i'am sad to see the lengths some have been forced to go to to avoid the move!

pay wise if this offer is put to us and agreed i will be leaving prospect as in this and most other things they haven't supported me or my fellow atc staff at manchester
mainecoon is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 16:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mahaba writes "Lets hope that it never happens to you or your friends". I have news for him it already has!!!!. The people at Manchester are complaining about lack of support for their fight against the closing down of the Manchester centre and that they do not wish to move to either Swanwick or Prestwick. I am from Cheshire when I joined I did not want to move to Bournemouth, then I was posted to West Drayton and I did not want to move to London, after twenty years I did not want to move to Hampshire, but the uncomfortable truth is that if you want a job in NATS then there is no choice. I know that NATS personnel policies are unfair, characterised by nepotism, favouritism, incompetence, and quite a few other things and that partners are having to find new jobs, children find new schools, relocating to a new area is always an uncomfortable experience, but lots of staff at Swanwick have had to do it preceded by years of uncertainty caused by the managements incompetence and duplicity. I, and a lot of other colleagues who are from the North of England would have dearly loved to have had the opportunity to work at Manchester alas it never happened, so I would say to the Manchester guys and girls "Accept the inevitable" and dont think that the management are concerned about your feelings and/or family concerns because they are not, their only concern are the monies that will be saved. Enjoy the experience of your remaining time at Manchester and the comradeship of your colleagues. In conclusion, I was very reluctant to move from the London area to rural Hampshire, but three years later I can honestly say it was the best thing I ever did.
DC10RealMan is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 21:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a quick comment to the DC10 person, as you quite rightly put it you and many others wanted to work at Manchester. I and many others would love to work in sunny Hampshire. None of us have been successful. This surely makes a mockery of being a mobile grade, if you are only allowed to be mobile when the company forces you to be.
DangerousD is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2004, 07:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PIK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My view of what has happened to you ? The decision to move was made over 2 years ago. Keith Robinson and following managers ignored reality and allowed the belief that it would never happen. It was going to, it is going to.

How many will actually go to Canada or other non NATS places remains to be seen. My bet is less than 10%

We wait and watch with interest for the terms and conditions of the move.
Arran's view is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2004, 07:44
  #9 (permalink)  

Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think we'll be approaching that 10% before not too long.
bagpuss lives is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2004, 22:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't become a betting man Arran.
qwerty2 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2004, 18:44
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop Arran

Your 10% doesn't seem to equate to what we are seeing on a daily basis with ATCO's testing each other on their breaks on the NAVCANADA assessment papers, it is now more widely read on the unit than our own MATS, believe it...people are now planning the move and have been for a while, families are organised, assessments are taking place constantly for MACC guys. The genuine feeling here for NATS is that most ATCO's have given up on it and our move is inevitable so we will go where we want to be. Most guys now agree in open that they are going, most agree that their families are going to be very dissapointed if they don't go. DISSAPOINTED.
We believe we will be getting an influx of new trainees over the next few years. Whose going to train them? Not us, those left intend to hand back their OJTI licence. Proof of our point, it's not and never has been about the money. We don't feel as if we're on the poverty line. It's the regrading. the way we've been handled (or rather have'nt), the tearing apart of a VIABLE unit. The ignorance of our managers. The hammering our morale has taken. It is a disgrace that at a unit with 95 ATCO's (that are valued higher overseas than they are here) who will be moving en-masse as a unit to a different country with all the complexity that entails with regard to family, partners, travel, homefinding, etc that we don't even have one HR body based here permanently to answer our questions or help with worries some guys may have. We should have had liaison visits, info on rental accomodation, maps of the area, info on house buying, general help with concerns. We thought that was THEIR job. They have this info.
We are dissapointed and are voting with our feet. BELIEVE IT.
And bear in mind. whatever is left of manchester is heading your way. We have just had our traffic levels anticipated for this summer and we don't know how our overloaded ( filed) sectors will cope. This is heading your way without (we believe) enough people to do it. It WILL in time affect ScOACC/NPC. We will watch the 10% that are left try to manage it. Even if it's only from afar.

And still they're closing us down.
Mahaba is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2004, 19:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MACC

You've had it too easy for too long.....join the real world. We have RADAR down here, we know exactly how busy you are in the Preston FIR.....ooopps....musn't mention Barton Hall, Antrobus, Hack Green, Eastern, Killard........Gosh! What are they Dad? Well son, they are just some of the units we used to have; they're closed now after the march of progress resulted in a successful transfer process of the people who were grateful to have a job and a good employer. I think the words "customer" and "economy" now feature in the modern equation.
055166k is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2004, 20:15
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop 055166k

Thanks for reminding us of how we're thought of elsewhere.
Enough said.
Good luck.
Mahaba is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2004, 22:33
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Moon
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is sad that so many people feel that they have to go to Canada instead of Prestwick,however the question must be asked if Nav Canada are so good why cant they fill the job vacancies with " locals "?

Ayr TC
AyrTC is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2004, 22:37
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Southampton
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I say this with no axe to grind.

Relocation is expensive for NATS. MACC is going to be closed. The fewer MACC controllers that relocate the cheaper it will be for NATS. They will blame the resultant delays on the "new system", rather than staff shortages.

AND

Training is expensive for NavCanada. The more MACC, LTCC and LACC controllers they can get the more money they save.
Arkady is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2004, 23:50
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: PIK
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mahaba .. I hope you enjoy Gander. Not many of the Canadians do.

The proof is in the action. Giving up OJTI ? 90% of you resigning and leaving the country .... yeah yeah yeah. For years you have buried your heads in the sand and ignored what was blindingly obvious. You are scheduled to close. Now it is a big shock ???
Arran's view is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2004, 03:58
  #17 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope you enjoy Gander
Hmmmmmm............way I saw it, those who sat the assessments weren't being offered Gander. And I believe there are even instructors in the college who are considering or are on the move.
Jerricho is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2004, 02:26
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arran's View

Gander??????????
Give me strength!!!!!!!!

TORONTO
VANCOUVER
EDMONTON
MONCTON
WINNIPEG.

Got it?...good!

We knew we were closing????????!!!!!!!!!!!

For the last ten...TEN...10!!!!!!!!!!!!!years Manchester controllers have been told all of the below;

"you are moving in 2 years" that was in 96.
"It'll never happen" from the previous GM for the last 9 years.
"If you move it will be to London/Swanwick" for the first 5 years from 92 onwards.
"We may move some to London and some to Scottish"
"if you take these London sectors you will not need to move"
"We have no idea when or if you will move"...
and so on and so on.


Arran.. get more informed before making remarks about what you obviously know nothing of the history of.
And finally they ADMIT they're closing us down.
Mahaba is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2004, 04:38
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Got to say it guys....

If you move to his part of the world, make sure its because you want to be here...If you just want to be in Ontario because its got a better post code than Kilmarnock .......forget it.
Letsgojetsgo is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2004, 21:57
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 43° 40' 47" , -80° 25' 28"
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My Ontario postcode begins "N0B"

I think Letsgojetsgo's right though, make sure your reasons are right for coming out here - it can be awfully tough. Not necessarily on you, but your family too. And don't get me started on the snow (although snowboarding after work last night was fan-bloody-tastic)!
Llamapoo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.