Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

use of the term "Company"

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

use of the term "Company"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th December 2003 | 01:06
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: In la la land.......
use of the term "Company"

Hi All

Am I correct in believing that the term "company" is used as a way of shortening messages by ground or tower controllers and that the term is used to describe the airline company that is the same as the aircraft the message is been passed to?

eg give way to company airbus 320

Thanks
z..
zoink is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 01:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Warwickshire
The short answer is Yes.

It is also used when a pilot is requested to contact the ops department on "box 2" (the 2nd radio on the aircraft, i.e "speedbird 2959, can you call company on box 2."

The "follow / after the landing / departing company" is as you say a way of controllers not having to say British Airways, British Midland, etc etc. reduces the RT workload.


As a cautionary note, it should only be used when the a/c is positively identified as another "company" aircraft and not one leased from another operator as often happens when aircraft have technical problems
radar707 is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 02:49
  #3 (permalink)  

Shining Example, apparently...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Lone Star State
This occurred to me when learning to in S. California:
- Aircraft aloft were referred to as 'traffic' on the tower/departure frequencies.
- Taxiing aircraft were referred to as 'company' on the ground frequency.

I inferred the distinction was between airborne and taxiing acft, though the above reply suggests 'company' just meant other GA traffic.

Can anyone confirm?
Crepello is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 03:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Herefordshire
Unhappy Use of term "company"

If you are taxying say an AA aircraft and are made aware of "Company Aircraft" approaching..... that means an aircraft operated by the same airline. OK? BM
BoeingMEL is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 11:29
  #5 (permalink)  

Shining Example, apparently...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Lone Star State
Yes BM, I gathered that from radar707's post.

I'd merely sought to clarify: If I'm taxiing a C152, 'company' means another Cessna? Seems rather subtle but I get the point. It's one of the many facets that isn't covered in basic training. I appreciate those that take the time to explain.
Crepello is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 13:43
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
Crepello,

I know of places that will describe another aircraft from the same flying school or club as company, maybe that was it?
Gonzo is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 16:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Warwickshire
Crepello, if you were taxying in your C172 and I needed you to wait for another Cessna to pass, I wouldn't refer to it as company, we (at least at Glasgow) don't class the smae manufacturer as "Company", just the same operator.
radar707 is offline  
Old 8th December 2003 | 18:18
  #8 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
From: This is the internet FFS.........
I guess on the ground at LHR, the use of "give way to company Concorde" was not heard that often? Or was it only Point 7?
Jerricho is offline  
Old 9th December 2003 | 01:57
  #9 (permalink)  

Shining Example, apparently...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Lone Star State
I've been told of 'company' on several occasions, assumed it was a generic term for taxiing acft so didn't note whose planes they were. I'll pay closer attention in future!

Thanks for the info guys - appreciated.
Crepello is offline  
Old 9th December 2003 | 02:36
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Maybe the controller was using slang and referred to company as in 'you have company' rather than 'caution company traffic'. I've never heard the term used when talking about someone in a C152 or something, so it's possible I guess
100% N1 is offline  
Old 10th December 2003 | 13:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: California USA
Having done ATC time at GA airports in SoCal, the only time I've ever heard a 172 or PA28 called "company" on freq was when it was from the same flight school. I would point out, however, that my lack of exposure to other uses of the term as applied to light aircraft does not prove that the term is only used in the way I've heard it used. In other words, I've not been all places at all times, much as I've tried.

Dave
av8boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.