LVP - Low Viz Procedures
|
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11507062)
LVP - Low Viz Procedures
|
LGW has a very weird micro-climate. Being on the river Mole, you often - especially at this time of year - get a load of fog that is not there even 1 mile from the airport. Many a time I left at at 06:00 in thick fog, yet Horley, less than a mile away was clear. And it lingers, sometimes for hours.
easyJet had scheduled 222 departures out of a total 434 today. Naturally, ATC and LVP affects them far more than the next highest airline, BA Euroflyer on 47. I hope I'm wrong, but I expect many more cancellations. |
Originally Posted by Apron Artist
(Post 11507079)
LGW has a very weird micro-climate. Being on the river Mole, you often - especially at this time of year - get a load of fog that is not there even 1 mile from the airport. Many a time I left at at 06:00 in thick fog, yet Horley, less than a mile away was clear. And it lingers, sometimes for hours.
easyJet had scheduled 222 departures out of a total 434 today. Naturally, ATC and LVP affects them far more than the next highest airline, BA Euroflyer on 47. I hope I'm wrong, but I expect many more cancellations. |
Originally Posted by vectisman
(Post 11507138)
Thanks for the informantion. I think that 47 includes the BA long haul flights too and the mainline Glasgow flight.
My apologies, yes. The data I get doesn't split the two entities. Tampa cancelled mainline. Not the first. |
Norse cuts flights to SFO again
Norse has futher trimmed their seasonal flights to San Francisco. All flights after Oct 7th ( including mine!) have now been cancelled. No alternative or compensation offered.
|
Originally Posted by YVRscot
(Post 11507348)
Norse has futher trimmed their seasonal flights to San Francisco. All flights after Oct 7th ( including mine!) have now been cancelled. No alternative or compensation offered.
You mentioned that all flights after October 07 2023 have been cancelled. Norse Atlantic had originally stated that the last flight between LGW and SFO would be on the 28 October, at the end of the IATA northern summer 2023 season. |
Originally Posted by YVRscot
(Post 11507348)
Norse has futher trimmed their seasonal flights to San Francisco. All flights after Oct 7th ( including mine!) have now been cancelled. No alternative or compensation offered.
|
Can I just say well done London Gatwick. We are here flying to Venice and both Easy Bag Drop and Security were a breeze. Both swift and polite all round...
|
Originally Posted by Kiltrash
(Post 11508648)
Can I just say well done London Gatwick. We are here flying to Venice and both Easy Bag Drop and Security were a breeze. Both swift and polite all round...
Not a dig at your post Kiltrash - glad you had a good experience. Sadly for arriving passengers in LGW today then very big delays knocking into departures as the afternoon progressed. |
Originally Posted by Dct_Mopas
(Post 11508881)
Can’t be quite so congratulatory of the Gatwick ATC management yet again today. Flow rate restriction of 16 arrivals per hour. Absolutely shambolic.
Not a dig at your post Kiltrash - glad you had a good experience. Sadly for arriving passengers in LGW today then very big delays knocking into departures as the afternoon progressed. |
A daily cap of 800 flight movements a day is in place until 1st October:
https://www.mediacentre.gatwickairpo...ddd-40f32.html |
While waiting for our flight to show gate no we noticed U28011 dep time 09.15 was shown as please wait....this got my curiosity and the aircraft arr into LGW on time at 08.10 according to FR24.... it eventually took off 12.24 so I thought ' tech issue ' ...perhaps just a flow rate issue ....Did feel sorry for the SLF..🙁
|
Originally Posted by Kiltrash
(Post 11508997)
While waiting for our flight to show gate no we noticed U28011 dep time 09.15 was shown as please wait....this got my curiosity and the aircraft arr into LGW on time at 08.10 according to FR24.... it eventually took off 12.24 so I thought ' tech issue ' ...perhaps just a flow rate issue ....Did feel sorry for the SLF..🙁
|
Is the limit on flights at Gatwick due to genuine illness amongst ATC staff, or is there any sort of deliberate sick-out ?
If it's genuine, are there any underlying factors (e.g. disgruntled staff), lousy planning of training junior staff or maybe overwork and burn-out of staff over the peak summer or is it a case of a lot of different uncontrollable factors like Covid all coming at once ? Is this likely to be just for a few days, or is there a non-trivial chance of an announcement this will continue into early October, or be in effect during half term as well ? |
Good question, as someone on the receiving end I’d like to know the answer too.
|
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
(Post 11509254)
Is the limit on flights at Gatwick due to genuine illness amongst ATC staff, or is there any sort of deliberate sick-out ?
|
Originally Posted by Splat
(Post 11509260)
Good question, as someone on the receiving end I’d like to know the answer too.
Gatwick launches flight curb due to ATC staffinghttps://www.turningleftforless.com/w...r-1024x568.jpgYou may have seen a few stories in the press recently about the delays at Gatwick as a result of a lack of ATC staff. To put it in context, ATC towers at airports are managed by separate ATC companies who bid for the contract. This is unlike the two UK ATC centres that are run by NATS as a monopoly and subject to price regulations by the CAA. At airports, the airport owner decides how much they are willing to pay for ATC and accepts a bid based on price and performance. [img] D0iMCAwIDEyIDgiIGZpbGw9Im5vbmUiIHhtbG5zPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczL m9yZy8yMDAwL3N2ZyI+CjxwYXRoIGZpbGwtcnVsZT0iZXZlbm9kZCIgY2xpc C1ydWxlPSJldmVub2RkIiBkPSJNMTEuMjU5MiAwLjU4NjMwOUMxMC45NDk4I DAuNjc2MTIzIDEwLjM2OCAwLjg5ODU1NSAxMC4xNDE1IDEuMzQzNjJDOS45M jgxOSAxLjc2MjIxIDEwLjA2OSAyLjMzNzU0IDEwLjE5NzUgMi42N0MxMC41M DY3IDIuNTgwMjkgMTEuMDg5OSAyLjM1Nzg2IDExLjMxNjUgMS45MTIzOEMxM S41NDMyIDEuNDY3MzEgMTEuMzczMSAwLjg4MTIwOCAxMS4yNTkyIDAuNTg2M zA5VjAuNTg2MzA5Wk05LjkwMDYxIDMuMjU1OUw5LjgxMjMgMy4wODUyQzkuN zg4OTMgMy4wMzk3MyA5LjI0MjA5IDEuOTYyNzggOS42NzMwMyAxLjExNjg4Q zEwLjEwMzYgMC4yNzA3NzggMTEuMzEzNiAwLjA0MzkzMjEgMTEuMzY0OCAwL jAzNDY5NEwxMS41NTc2IDBMMTEuNjQ1OSAwLjE3MDY5OUMxMS42NjkzIDAuM jE2MTcxIDEyLjIxNiAxLjI5MzAyIDExLjc4NDkgMi4xMzkxMkMxMS4zNTQ4I DIuOTg0ODIgMTAuMTQ0NyAzLjIxMTg3IDEwLjA5MzMgMy4yMjExMUw5LjkwM DYxIDMuMjU1OVoiIGZpbGw9IiM5MTkxOTEiLz4KPHBhdGggZmlsbC1ydWxlP SJldmVub2RkIiBjbGlwLXJ1bGU9ImV2ZW5vZGQiIGQ9Ik0yLjY0NDc1IDIuN jQ3NzlDMi41NzkxNyAxLjI4MzQzIDEuNDQwMjIgMC4xOTQ4NzggMC4wMzI5N TkgMC4xNjE2MjFWNS4zODI1NkMwLjAzNDAxMTYgNS4zODI1NiAwLjAzNTA2N DIgNS4zODI0NiAwLjAzNjExNjkgNS4zODIzNkMwLjEwMTY5NiA2Ljc0NjcyI DEuMjQwNjQgNy44MzUzNyAyLjY0NzkxIDcuODY4NTJWMi42NDc2OUMyLjY0N jg1IDIuNjQ3NjkgMi42NDU4IDIuNjQ3NzkgMi42NDQ3NSAyLjY0Nzc5IiBma WxsPSIjOTE5MTkxIi8+CjxwYXRoIGZpbGwtcnVsZT0iZXZlbm9kZCIgY2xpc C1ydWxlPSJldmVub2RkIiBkPSJNNS43MTcyNiAyLjY0Nzc5QzUuNjUxNjggM S4yODM0MyA0LjUxMjczIDAuMTk0ODc4IDMuMTA1NDcgMC4xNjE2MjFWNS4zO DI1NkMzLjEwNjUyIDUuMzgyNTYgMy4xMDc1NyA1LjM4MjQ2IDMuMTA4NzMgN S4zODIzNkMzLjE3NDIxIDYuNzQ2NzIgNC4zMTMxNSA3LjgzNTM3IDUuNzIwN TIgNy44Njg1MlYyLjY0NzY5QzUuNzE5NDcgMi42NDc2OSA1LjcxODMxIDIuN jQ3NzkgNS43MTcyNiAyLjY0Nzc5IiBmaWxsPSIjOTE5MTkxIi8+CjxwYXRoI GZpbGwtcnVsZT0iZXZlbm9kZCIgY2xpcC1ydWxlPSJldmVub2RkIiBkPSJNO C43OTAwMSAyLjY0Nzc5QzguNzI0MzMgMS4yODM0MyA3LjU4NTQ5IDAuMTk0O Dc4IDYuMTc4MjIgMC4xNjE2MjFWNS4zODI1NkM2LjE3OTI4IDUuMzgyNTYgN i4xODAzMyA1LjM4MjQ2IDYuMTgxMzggNS4zODIzNkM2LjI0Njk2IDYuNzQ2N zIgNy4zODYwMSA3LjgzNTM3IDguNzkzMTcgNy44Njg1MlYyLjY0NzY5QzguN zkyMTIgMi42NDc2OSA4Ljc5MTA2IDIuNjQ3NzkgOC43OTAwMSAyLjY0Nzc5I iBmaWxsPSIjOTE5MTkxIi8+Cjwvc3ZnPgo=[/img]The major airports are usually still controlled by NATS because they have a huge amount of expertise and employ the majority of air traffic controllers in the UK. It came as a huge shock to everyone in 2014 when Gatwick decided to remove NATS staff from the tower and award the 10 year contract to a subsidiary of the German ATC company, DFS. Gatwick is a very complex and tightly honed operation with highly skilled controllers who operate one of the busiest single runway operations in the world. Now I’m guessing it did not go too well as four years before the end of the contract period, they handed the contract back to NATS late last year. As you may imagine, moving everything from one company to another, including the staff, is not a simple process, and NATS have only had the contract back for a short time. NATS inherited the staff from the previous company, so they had no control over how many they would get. Controllers can choose to transfer to the new company or leave. Unfortunately, you can’t just transfer controllers from say Heathrow, as a) they still need extensive training to work at Gatwick and b) then it leaves Heathrow short. You also can’t train new controllers quickly as it takes around 18 months at a minimum, and only around 1% of those that apply make it through to be a live controller. At airports, they are very susceptible to lack of staff due to sickness as they only have a small number of staff due to the number of positions in a tower plus contingency. No ATC provider can afford to have unlimited numbers of staff sitting around when they are competing on price. Once NATS have trained more controllers, then staff sickness will not cause such an issue. According to Gatwick airport, 30% of NATS tower staff are currently unavailable for a variety of medical reasons including covid. So this leaves us in the situation today where Gatwick today implemented a temporary limit on daily flight movements to prevent delays and last-minute cancellations for passengers. The decision was made alongside NATS, and means the airport will be limited to 800 flights a day. This means both departure and arrival flights. The restrictions start today and will remain in place until Sunday, 1 October. [img] D0iMCAwIDEyIDgiIGZpbGw9Im5vbmUiIHhtbG5zPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczL m9yZy8yMDAwL3N2ZyI+CjxwYXRoIGZpbGwtcnVsZT0iZXZlbm9kZCIgY2xpc C1ydWxlPSJldmVub2RkIiBkPSJNMTEuMjU5MiAwLjU4NjMwOUMxMC45NDk4I DAuNjc2MTIzIDEwLjM2OCAwLjg5ODU1NSAxMC4xNDE1IDEuMzQzNjJDOS45M jgxOSAxLjc2MjIxIDEwLjA2OSAyLjMzNzU0IDEwLjE5NzUgMi42N0MxMC41M DY3IDIuNTgwMjkgMTEuMDg5OSAyLjM1Nzg2IDExLjMxNjUgMS45MTIzOEMxM S41NDMyIDEuNDY3MzEgMTEuMzczMSAwLjg4MTIwOCAxMS4yNTkyIDAuNTg2M zA5VjAuNTg2MzA5Wk05LjkwMDYxIDMuMjU1OUw5LjgxMjMgMy4wODUyQzkuN zg4OTMgMy4wMzk3MyA5LjI0MjA5IDEuOTYyNzggOS42NzMwMyAxLjExNjg4Q zEwLjEwMzYgMC4yNzA3NzggMTEuMzEzNiAwLjA0MzkzMjEgMTEuMzY0OCAwL jAzNDY5NEwxMS41NTc2IDBMMTEuNjQ1OSAwLjE3MDY5OUMxMS42NjkzIDAuM jE2MTcxIDEyLjIxNiAxLjI5MzAyIDExLjc4NDkgMi4xMzkxMkMxMS4zNTQ4I DIuOTg0ODIgMTAuMTQ0NyAzLjIxMTg3IDEwLjA5MzMgMy4yMjExMUw5LjkwM DYxIDMuMjU1OVoiIGZpbGw9IiM5MTkxOTEiLz4KPHBhdGggZmlsbC1ydWxlP SJldmVub2RkIiBjbGlwLXJ1bGU9ImV2ZW5vZGQiIGQ9Ik0yLjY0NDc1IDIuN jQ3NzlDMi41NzkxNyAxLjI4MzQzIDEuNDQwMjIgMC4xOTQ4NzggMC4wMzI5N TkgMC4xNjE2MjFWNS4zODI1NkMwLjAzNDAxMTYgNS4zODI1NiAwLjAzNTA2N DIgNS4zODI0NiAwLjAzNjExNjkgNS4zODIzNkMwLjEwMTY5NiA2Ljc0NjcyI DEuMjQwNjQgNy44MzUzNyAyLjY0NzkxIDcuODY4NTJWMi42NDc2OUMyLjY0N jg1IDIuNjQ3NjkgMi42NDU4IDIuNjQ3NzkgMi42NDQ3NSAyLjY0Nzc5IiBma WxsPSIjOTE5MTkxIi8+CjxwYXRoIGZpbGwtcnVsZT0iZXZlbm9kZCIgY2xpc C1ydWxlPSJldmVub2RkIiBkPSJNNS43MTcyNiAyLjY0Nzc5QzUuNjUxNjggM S4yODM0MyA0LjUxMjczIDAuMTk0ODc4IDMuMTA1NDcgMC4xNjE2MjFWNS4zO DI1NkMzLjEwNjUyIDUuMzgyNTYgMy4xMDc1NyA1LjM4MjQ2IDMuMTA4NzMgN S4zODIzNkMzLjE3NDIxIDYuNzQ2NzIgNC4zMTMxNSA3LjgzNTM3IDUuNzIwN TIgNy44Njg1MlYyLjY0NzY5QzUuNzE5NDcgMi42NDc2OSA1LjcxODMxIDIuN jQ3NzkgNS43MTcyNiAyLjY0Nzc5IiBmaWxsPSIjOTE5MTkxIi8+CjxwYXRoI GZpbGwtcnVsZT0iZXZlbm9kZCIgY2xpcC1ydWxlPSJldmVub2RkIiBkPSJNO C43OTAwMSAyLjY0Nzc5QzguNzI0MzMgMS4yODM0MyA3LjU4NTQ5IDAuMTk0O Dc4IDYuMTc4MjIgMC4xNjE2MjFWNS4zODI1NkM2LjE3OTI4IDUuMzgyNTYgN i4xODAzMyA1LjM4MjQ2IDYuMTgxMzggNS4zODIzNkM2LjI0Njk2IDYuNzQ2N zIgNy4zODYwMSA3LjgzNTM3IDguNzkzMTcgNy44Njg1MlYyLjY0NzY5QzguN zkyMTIgMi42NDc2OSA4Ljc5MTA2IDIuNjQ3NzkgOC43OTAwMSAyLjY0Nzc5I iBmaWxsPSIjOTE5MTkxIi8+Cjwvc3ZnPgo=[/img]Stewart Wingate, CEO of London Gatwick, said: “This has been a difficult decision but the action we have taken today means our airlines can fly reliable flight programmes, which gives passengers more certainty that they will not face last minute cancellations. “We are working closely with NATS to build resilience in the control tower, and this decision means we can prevent as much disruptions as possible. “London Gatwick would like to apologise to any passengers who have been impacted by these restrictions.” Before the limit was put in place the movements expected for this week were as follows: Tuesday- 800 movements Weds – 829 movements Thursday – 840 movements Friday –865 movements Saturday – 800 movements Sunday – 830 movements As it has only just been announced, I have not heard of specific cancellations, but if you have a booking this week from Gatwick I would be keeping a close eye on it. |
I do wonder if all this goes back to that t@at MOL pushing fares down. Eventually everyone’s costs are squeezed so low either other ancillaries such as drop off charges are needed, or there is a reduction in service levels which is where we are at.
|
Originally Posted by Splat
(Post 11509295)
I do wonder if all this goes back to that t@at MOL pushing fares down. Eventually everyone’s costs are squeezed so low either other ancillaries such as drop off charges are needed, or there is a reduction in service levels which is where we are at.
|
Originally Posted by lfc84
(Post 11509300)
Their ops at LGW is tiny
|
Originally Posted by Charley B
(Post 11509284)
Excellent article from Michele Robson who was a controller for NATS for over 20 years
Gatwick launches flight curb due to ATC staffing |
Glad it was enjoyed..after ready many OTT newspaper ones ,that was well written and to the point ..I know that a good few NATS controllers left the tower in 2014 and it seems the German Co did not recruit many after they took over ..leaving NATS very short now
|
Good to see an article with actual statistics and reasoning behind it... Just need a few more controllers which is easier said then done
|
Originally Posted by Splat
(Post 11509295)
I do wonder if all this goes back to that t@at MOL pushing fares down. Eventually everyone’s costs are squeezed so low either other ancillaries such as drop off charges are needed, or there is a reduction in service levels which is where we are at.
|
But Ryanair have lead the charge on airport costs
|
Originally Posted by Splat
(Post 11509295)
I do wonder if all this goes back to that t@at MOL pushing fares down. Eventually everyone’s costs are squeezed so low either other ancillaries such as drop off charges are needed, or there is a reduction in service levels which is where we are at.
|
Originally Posted by TartinTon
(Post 11509391)
You're clearly confused. This is NATS, nothing to do with Ryanair. This seems to be just gross mismanagement and a board (including some prominent airlines BA, Easyjet etc) prioritising shareholder return over system/staff investment. £550 million returned to shareholders over the last few years with an ever-decreasing service to the airline community from which they derive their income.
|
Ground handling
Anyone know who has the contract for Air Mauritius/Ethiopian/China Southern?
|
Funny how Ryanair end up getting the blame for everything, it’s obviously nothing to do with Ryanair.
I read somewhere that some airlines may be operating from alternative Airports for a short period, I can’t find it now and not sure if I read it properly, has anyone heard anything along those lines or was I imagining it. |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 11509401)
NATS have to compete to get the LGW ATC contract, so will be looking to provide it at the lowest cost.
|
Originally Posted by Dannyboy39
(Post 11509792)
Compete with whom exactly?
|
Originally Posted by Dannyboy39
(Post 11509792)
Compete with whom exactly?
|
The concept of ATC based on price is weapons grade foolishness. There are some things that should be open to competitive tendering but ATC provision has VERY few specialist providers of which NATS is one.
|
Railtrack
|
The other week several of us on here were debating possible long haul contenders at LGW.
We discussed several possible candidate's including China Southern Airlines which we eventually dismissed. How things change in such a short space of time. China Southern Airlines announces Zhengzhou to London Gatwick. Effectivel 12 December 2023 and operated twice weekly by B788. CZ653 CGO 14.00 LGW 17.20 days 26 788 CZ654 LGW 20.20 CGO 15.00+1 days 26 788 Meanwhile Sri Lankan Airways want to add an additional three flights between Colombo and LHR. The airline currently operates the route on a daily basis but wants to increase it to 10 weekly. The airline has recently stated in the travel media that those extra three flights might be difficult to obtain at LHR due to a lack of available and suitable slots. Debating the topic again, could Sri Lankan Airlines be a possible future contender for LGW. Of course, it would be a service resumption for the airline. Air Lanka which the airline was previously known as flew to LGW from 1979 to 1991. |
Sri Lankan have 9 weekly LHR slots in winter I think? UL505 runs weekends in addition to the daily UL 503.
|
Originally Posted by Skipness One Foxtrot
(Post 11510352)
Sri Lankan have 9 weekly LHR slots in winter I think? UL505 runs weekends in addition to the daily UL 503.
They were leasing some slots at some point. Perhaps it's those extra flights during the winter season that they want to make permanent. On side note. It's great to see the beautiful country of Sri Lanka on the rebound after such a tormented period. There has been a lot of positive coverage of the country on TV over the last year and lots of YouTube footage. After previously visiting Sri Lanka on several occasions I can only hope that the increase in trade as well as travel and tourism will benefit the entire country. |
So much for flow control restrictions this week, taking a Jet2 diversion today, Ok it was PAN so emergency but STN only up road - and a BizJet arrival today. Couldn't the later movement been used for an Easyjet canx flight?
|
Originally Posted by pabely
(Post 11510746)
So much for flow control restrictions this week, taking a Jet2 diversion today, Ok it was PAN so emergency but STN only up road - and a BizJet arrival today. Couldn't the later movement been used for an Easyjet canx flight?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:38. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.