PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Airlines, Airports & Routes (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes-85/)
-   -   Jet2-6 (https://www.pprune.org/airlines-airports-routes/637092-jet2-6-a.html)

Richard Taylor 5th Aug 2022 14:25

As long as they keep Jess Glynne away from ABZ..... ;)

Big Tudor 5th Aug 2022 20:08


Originally Posted by Richard Taylor (Post 11273488)
As long as they keep Jess Glynne away from ABZ..... ;)

”Wee darling, haud ma haund.” 😆

P330 7th Aug 2022 17:54

Good July
 
Jet2 were the only UK airline not to cancel a flight in July.

https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co..../20603858.amp/


P330 7th Aug 2022 17:56

Fatigue Concerns
 
Jet2 slammed by unions for not wanting to engage in a discussion about pilot fatigue.

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...32993.html?amp

chaps1954 7th Aug 2022 18:45

Oh I can see it they want the airline shut down and all holidays cancelled

Chesty Morgan 7th Aug 2022 19:12


Originally Posted by P330 (Post 11274594)
Jet2 slammed by unions for not wanting to engage in a discussion about pilot fatigue.

https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...32993.html?amp

Read - Balpa are having a hissy fit because Jet2 wont talk to them about fatigue.

I have had no issues going fatigued when I've needed to. No comeback, no calls, nothing.

If it ain't broke...

SWBKCB 7th Aug 2022 19:35


Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan (Post 11274629)
Read - Balpa are having a hissy fit because Jet2 wont talk to them about fatigue.

I have had no issues going fatigued when I've needed to. No comeback, no calls, nothing.

If it ain't broke...

Depends on your meaning of "hissy fit" - the article says:


“Jet2 pilots have asked Balpa to work with the airline to agree meaningful safety protections for their rosters in light of the current - more permissive - European flight time rules, which Balpa believes some airlines use as targets and not maximum limits,” the union said in a statement. 
Doesn't seem too unreasonable an approach from a union to respond to requests from its members?

Albert Hall 7th Aug 2022 19:46

It rather depends on whether the union has majority support to start throwing its weight around. And one might also ask how the state of the general “relationships” are between BALPA and Jet2 😜

speed13ird 7th Aug 2022 20:29


Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan (Post 11274629)
Read - Balpa are having a hissy fit because Jet2 wont talk to them about fatigue.

I have had no issues going fatigued when I've needed to. No comeback, no calls, nothing.

If it ain't broke...

you have completely missed the point, why were you fatigued?

Chesty Morgan 7th Aug 2022 22:58


Originally Posted by speed13ird (Post 11274657)
you have completely missed the point, why were you fatigued?

I think that's none of your business.

excrab 8th Aug 2022 10:30

If it was due to family and personal circumstances preventing you resting it isn’t. If it was due to rostering practises then in view of the topic it might be of legitimate interest.

Bam Thwok 8th Aug 2022 15:00


Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan (Post 11274629)
Read - Balpa are having a hissy fit because Jet2 wont talk to them about fatigue.

I have had no issues going fatigued when I've needed to. No comeback, no calls, nothing.

If it ain't broke...

I’m with Chesty on this one.

I read the internal J2 BALPA communications in the lead up to the “going public”.
To me, it’s obvious that the CC are, understandably, frustrated with the continuing stance of the Company in belligerently refusing to discuss “rostering”
However, the press article honestly took me quite by surprise. I found it sensationalist, ill timed and thought out.
Quite frankly, I didn’t recognise or agree with its claims.

I wholeheartedly agree with Chesty. When I’ve felt at any time fatigued I’ve gone through the Company process with “ no comeback, no calls, nothing”
What would have been logged though, is a “fatigue report” for the company to add to the stats.

The trouble I believe is that there are too few of us doing this and so the Company can argue that there isn’t a problem.
I hear all too often from colleagues that complain of bad rostering and feeling fatigued but it transpires that they’ve agreed to work days off, swop rostered duties and accept roster changes when not obliged to.

We’re our own worst enemy !









P330 14th Aug 2022 17:28

Emergency Landing
 
This sounds quite distressing.

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/u...woman-27737124

Flying Wild 14th Aug 2022 18:08


Originally Posted by Bam Thwok (Post 11275094)
I’m with Chesty on this one.

I read the internal J2 BALPA communications in the lead up to the “going public”.
To me, it’s obvious that the CC are, understandably, frustrated with the continuing stance of the Company in belligerently refusing to discuss “rostering”
However, the press article honestly took me quite by surprise. I found it sensationalist, ill timed and thought out.
Quite frankly, I didn’t recognise or agree with its claims.

I wholeheartedly agree with Chesty. When I’ve felt at any time fatigued I’ve gone through the Company process with “ no comeback, no calls, nothing”
What would have been logged though, is a “fatigue report” for the company to add to the stats.


The trouble I believe is that there are too few of us doing this and so the Company can argue that there isn’t a problem.
I hear all too often from colleagues that complain of bad rostering and feeling fatigued but it transpires that they’ve agreed to work days off, swop rostered duties and accept roster changes when not obliged to.

We’re our own worst enemy !

I think the point is though, that the company isn't willing to take advice from experienced professionals in the field of fatigue nor invest in the software to actively look at the roster to identify potentially fatiguing duty blocks. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to identify that a duty on day one checking in around 0500z then a duty on day 2 checking out at 0200z on day 3 is probably going to be a fatiguing change. Why should it be down to a crew member to highlight this, or report fatigued - it should be captured before ever reaching the active roster.

lfc84 14th Aug 2022 19:37


Originally Posted by P330 (Post 11278356)

Sounds like the cabin crew should have been more robust in their response

Flying Wild 14th Aug 2022 19:55


Originally Posted by lfc84 (Post 11278392)
Sounds like the cabin crew should have been more robust in their response

They are not trained in restraint techniques. If they attempted to physically restrain a passenger and something untoward resulted, they'd be out with the company SOPs and probably left to face subsequent legal action themselves.

MARKEYD 14th Aug 2022 20:27


Originally Posted by lfc84 (Post 11278392)
Sounds like the cabin crew should have been more robust in their response

Obviously you were there to help out. ?

What a stupid comment to make and not knowing the full story and what crew were involved in the incident i suggest you refrain from posting comments like this

davidjohnson6 14th Aug 2022 20:32


Originally Posted by Flying Wild (Post 11278396)
They are not trained in restraint techniques. If they attempted to physically restrain a passenger and something untoward resulted, they'd be out with the company SOPs and probably left to face subsequent legal action themselves.

I thought the Air Navigation Order exists to give crew very strong powers to do whatever seems necessary at the time, especially post 9/11 ?

speed13ird 14th Aug 2022 20:43


Originally Posted by Chesty Morgan (Post 11274726)
I think that's none of your business.

If I may rephrase my point, if it's a personal issue you call in sick, but if you are fatigued due poor rostering or unforeseen circumstances then it's not a personal issue is it?

jethro15 14th Aug 2022 21:00


Sounds like the cabin crew should have been more robust in their response
A totally unjust statement.

For a start, there are inconsistences with what is/was being reported, and what the video shows. Agreed, the passenger is behaving in an unacceptable manner towards a cabin crew member and another passenger. Given the stature female staff involved, and the abuse she was subjected to, I applaud her efforts to remain calm. I wasn’t there but it does appear that a fellow passenger intervened to alleviate the situation. However, I feel there is more to this incident than journalism and social media are enabling constructive comment to be made.

It was a serious incident necessitating a divert to offload the offending passenger. I for one am prepared to wait for an official outcome, before falling foul of casting ill-informed judgment.


I thought the Air Navigation Order exists to give crew very strong powers to do whatever seems necessary at the time, especially post 9/11?
An interesting point. I’m sure there have been incidents reported on this forum of cabin staff restraining passengers, just like there have been of passengers doing likewise. Supper is ready; therefore, research is on hold.


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:28.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.