TFS bus crash lawsuit
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 10608834)
It's clearly an airport issue - it's irrelevant which a/c the pax got off (which was how I read ATNotts original point).
He said: “This was a very complex case due to the number of people affected as well as the need to liaise with foreign authorities. “However, I can confirm all 33 cases are now concluded. “Our clients should have been enjoying their holiday and instead they were left with injuries. A Jet2 spokesman said: “Although we were not responsible for the accident, which took place between two vehicles driven by airport staff, we do of course acknowledge the distress that it must have caused. We now consider this matter closed.” I guess the lawyers would have class auctioned the TFS airport authority, the airlines' handling agent (and who drove the buses) and likely Jet2 also as the pax were in their care... May have been a joint liability settlement. anyway case closed now |
Originally Posted by SWBKCB
(Post 10608834)
It's clearly an airport issue - it's irrelevant which a/c the pax got off (which was how I read ATNotts original point).
|
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 10608868)
I actually interpreted it as the issue being on the transfer between resort and airport, which is why I considered it totally irrelevant to Jet2 (the airline). That of course was an incorrect assumption.
|
vWill Jet 2 be the Evelop 330 again next year ? Seems to be a nice aircraft . |
Thought they were getting the other Air Tanker machine to be based at Manchester
|
Talking to a jet 2. bod he said they may have up to 4 x 330 aircraft next year! |
Looks like LSAG had a fun night. been circling off the coast of TFS for about 2 hours now. Not got any higher than 7000ft |
Originally Posted by nowhereasfiled
(Post 10610142)
Looks like LSAG had a fun night. been circling off the coast of TFS for about 2 hours now. Not got any higher than 7000ft FR24 seems to suggest this was a revenue flight. Perhaps a (not too serious) problem was detected after take off and this was a fuel-burning exercise before returning to TFS? They must’ve been dizzy after that! |
Simple answer - No fuel dump on the 757 however IIRC it was certified to land back at Max Take-off Weight and therefore has no need for fuel dump facilities.
A320 family - ditto. |
You are quite correct: no dump in the 75. Also the 75, as are most aircraft, certified to land at Max TOW. However it would require an overweight land check. So why no burn down to landing weight? Better still IMO, no knowing the facts, steam North and land in Malaga. Closer to Blighty, easier repat if bad tech problem? |
Going by Jethro's website the first two A321 will be ex TCX G-TCVC & G-TCVD which are at Lasham.
|
Originally Posted by BFS BHD
(Post 10610687)
Going by Jethro's website the first two A321 will be ex TCX G-TCVC & G-TCVD which are at Lasham.
|
Originally Posted by Ivan aromer
(Post 10610674)
You are quite correct: no dump in the 75. Also the 75, as are most aircraft, certified to land at Max TOW. However it would require an overweight land check. So why no burn down to landing weight? Better still IMO, no knowing the facts, steam North and land in Malaga. Closer to Blighty, easier repat if bad tech problem? |
It's quite likely the ex-Thomas Cook aircraft will be re-registered before they enter service with Jet2. Possible sequence could be JZA*, if it hasn't already been allocated.
|
Originally Posted by ROC10
(Post 10610172)
Wow that does not look good... FR24 seems to suggest this was a revenue flight. Perhaps a (not too serious) problem was detected after take off and this was a fuel-burning exercise before returning to TFS? They must’ve been dizzy after that! |
Originally Posted by Mooncrest
(Post 10610756)
It's quite likely the ex-Thomas Cook aircraft will be re-registered before they enter service with Jet2. Possible sequence could be JZA*, if it hasn't already been allocated.
|
If the first two listed A321 are correct then it will be a surprise as it will mean A321's with a mix of both V2500 & CFM engines, if they are going to all come from TCX.
Jethro's is an excellent web site, which l have submitted info to over the years, but remember it is only as good as the info he is given, very difficult for him to know 100% if that info is correct. |
None of the ex-ZB Airbuses are going to Jet2. The first 6 are TCDD, DP, DE, DK, DB, DG all from storage Shannon. |
Originally Posted by nowhereasfiled
(Post 10610863)
None of the ex-ZB Airbuses are going to Jet2. The first 6 are TCDD, DP, DE, DK, DB, DG all from storage Shannon. |
Originally Posted by Mooncrest
(Post 10610756)
It's quite likely the ex-Thomas Cook aircraft will be re-registered before they enter service with Jet2. Possible sequence could be JZA*, if it hasn't already been allocated.
Plenty of others to choose from though. Jet2 owned reg's currently start with A, B, F, H, L and T W is also out, as they lease these from Titan That leaves upto 19 different options |
Originally Posted by garry8g
(Post 10610888)
DE is in Lake City, Florida, so it won't be that one. So it could be the other 5 plus the 2 ex-ZB A321's. (If you say they are not going to Jet2, what's your source?)
I think it’s out there for repainting. |
With TUI announcing that they are going to fly into Melbourne (MLB) in Florida rather than Sanford from 2022 would this have any bearing if Jet2 decided to start to fly to MCO?
|
Originally Posted by stonejo
(Post 10611120)
With TUI announcing that they are going to fly into Melbourne (MLB) in Florida rather than Sanford from 2022 would this have any bearing if Jet2 decided to start to fly to MCO?
|
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 10611125)
Haven't insiders at Jet2 on this forum said numerous times that Jet2 have no interest in operating in that market?
|
MLB v SFB/MCO
Originally Posted by stonejo
(Post 10611120)
With TUI announcing that they are going to fly into Melbourne (MLB) in Florida rather than Sanford from 2022 would this have any bearing if Jet2 decided to start to fly to MCO?
UK airlines were offered greatly reduced landing fees at Sanford, and therefore many carriers relocated their operations. Virgin and BA stayed put at MCO I gather was it Thomas Cook who went back to MCO in recent years. TUI's latest move is to tie-in with their large cruise ship operation, with the MLB airport nearer Port Canaveral If Jet2 ventures to Florida my guess is they will fly to SFB or MCO |
You're correct. Thomas Cook operated into Orlando.
|
Originally Posted by Jonty
(Post 10611101)
It could of course be flown back. I think it’s out there for repainting. |
Originally Posted by Plane.Silly
(Post 10611086)
Agree with the G-JZ part, but the A* range has already been taken up with the G-LSA* range, Can imagine from an ops and maintenance perspective have two different aircraft called Alpha Alpha would be confusing
Plenty of others to choose from though. Jet2 owned reg's currently start with A, B, F, H, L and T W is also out, as they lease these from Titan That leaves upto 19 different options |
Jet 2 will not require these aircraft until the 2020 summer season, with a limited number prior to that for crew training.
I would not put any mind to where these aircraft might be heading. They will need to go into storage, ideal climate not being in England or Ireland. Prior to delivery all 7 aircraft will require a heavy maintenance check to clear them for 24 months (what was a "C" check), as is the norm and a paint job. This can be anywhere in the world and is a lot cheaper outside of the UK. |
Originally Posted by toledoashley
(Post 10611148)
I think its more likely that the announcement of Gold Medal/Travel2 doing their own charters would fit the Orlando market better.
|
Originally Posted by pamann
(Post 10611206)
Do you have a link to this announcement? I can’t find anything on line about it? |
Originally Posted by toledoashley
(Post 10611211)
|
Originally Posted by ATNotts
(Post 10611125)
Haven't insiders at Jet2 on this forum said numerous times that Jet2 have no interest in operating in that market?
|
Originally Posted by toledoashley
(Post 10611211)
As for Jet2 possible long haul, there’s some big gaps in the market that would fit the Jet2 demographic very well. Orlando/Sanford, Puerto Plata, Varadero, Holguin and Cayo Coco spring to mind. |
Cabin crew on our recent Jet2 flight out of BHX confidently told me that flights to Orlando would be starting in 2020.
I appreciate that this is far from an official announcement, but it would appear that the rumours may be true. |
Originally Posted by wowzz
(Post 10611395)
Cabin crew on our recent Jet2 flight out of BHX confidently told me that flights to Orlando would be starting in 2020.
I appreciate that this is far from an official announcement, but it would appear that the rumours may be true. |
Originally Posted by wowzz
(Post 10611395)
Cabin crew on our recent Jet2 flight out of BHX confidently told me that flights to Orlando would be starting in 2020.
I appreciate that this is far from an official announcement, but it would appear that the rumours may be true. |
Originally Posted by Scottie Dog
(Post 10611426)
So much for confidentially!!
|
Mmm... its not gone that well for other's who tried long haul charter leisure... (Monarch, Excel, Excalibur etc) Why do they just not stick to what they seem to do very well... good product short haul. The logistics and costs with long haul are in different league. |
Jet2 have no interest in starting long haul. They know their market and what works for them and have enough going on next year with the a321 project. in other news GDRTR is on its way from CTU via Astana and then MAN arriving in the morning. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:01. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.