Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Airlines, Airports & Routes
Reload this Page >

Good News for the Star Alliance......

Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Good News for the Star Alliance......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jan 2003, 15:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: hoschton, GA, USA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good News for the Star Alliance......

Good News for the Star Alliance is bad news for UAL Pilots....

UAL is parking in the desert 44 747-400s, 17 767's, 5 757's...

Look for another 1200 or so pilots out the door.....

Tilton (CEO) said United will maintain its presence in the Pacific with Star Alliance Partners......

Well on the way to being a Virtual Airline in a Virtual World......
A-V-8R is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 16:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question

Recently, there were several UAL 744's for sale on the page below:

http://www.unitedsvcs.com/html/aircraft_avail.html

They have suddenly disappeared...
Airbubba is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2003, 18:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: formally Alamo battleground, now the crocodile with palm trees!
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question not sure

I don't know if that is good news for some Star Alliance members. I'd guess United gives up the not-so profitable routes. Looking at the Latin American members Varig and Mexicana (Source) I doubt that they are happy to take over the ex-united routes. Both airlines had lay-offs as far as I know.

I could be wrong of course.
Squawk7777 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 08:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Australasia partners won't benefit!

United also plan to get out of their NZ routes from 31 March (and guessing that they are also quitting Australia). Air NZ don't have the capacity to pick up any spare LAX passengers, so Qantas and OneWorld must be laughing. Perhaps Singapore Airlines will benefit for those heading to Europe, but it opens the door for others to nab to Aussie - US routes.
Anti Skid On is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 15:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Paros, Greece
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, is 44 747's the entire fleet, and don't they own most of them owned rather than leased? I'd imagine that any of the carriers who don't have the capacity to pick up on the lost UAL routes would be able to get a VERY good deal on some of the retirees.

Also looks like the proposed sale of 7 of them to Thai has fallen through because Thailand apparently don't agree with the situation between the US and Iraq.
knobbygb is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2003, 18:41
  #6 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anti Skid

I thought I saw in Dunnunda that NZ were actually putting on extra capacity per week AKL-LAX - maybe not full capacity but they are having a go at it.

Let's see if I can find it...

[clickedy]

http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthr...threadid=77693

14th Feb. NZ go from 14 to 17.
MarkD is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.