Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Teesside-2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jan 2022, 18:02
  #881 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Planning shouldn't be a problem going by everything else which has been pushed through.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 08:23
  #882 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have thought that the obvious place for Willis is the South Side where possibly the remains of Ruhr Express are buried, in regards to noise and housing, the Airfield has been there since WW2, if you don't like aircraft or the noise they make you don't buy a house near an Airfield.
I find it very annoying that the old Airfield at Croft has been used for racing cars and motorcycles since the 40's/ 50's and you have people buying houses in the area complaining about noise making it difficult for the Owners to make the venue viable, the house owners are usually the same people that used to go to the old Football Stadiums at Darlington and Middlesbrough and cause traffic, parking problems and noise pollution for the residents.
tramontana is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 08:40
  #883 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,555
Received 89 Likes on 61 Posts
the Airfield has been there since WW2, if you don't like aircraft or the noise they make you don't buy a house near an Airfield.
Which is fine as a general principle, but the area suggested by H77 isn't currently part of the airfield, so this would be moving the airfield towards the houses. As you suggest, the best place for this sort of aviation related industrial activity might be the area identified in the masterplan and for which planning permission has been granted for these sorts of activities i.e. the south side.
SWBKCB is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 13:54
  #884 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Teesside Airport CAA Figures for November 2021:

Aircraft Movements 1471
Passenger Terminal & Transit 6959

Amsterdam 888
Alicante 2550

Aberdeen 1596
Belfast 503
Heathrow 1398
Luton 24
Harold77 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 19:49
  #885 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Figures out for November…ouch….4/5k down on comparable years 2018 and 2019.

Looking forward to the mayor’s spin on that🙈

A lot of TVCA money riding on improvements..but suspect December will be similar?
Duty Free and Spa(opening soon) will be offering some pretty good discounts I think!
highwideandugly is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 20:01
  #886 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
November CAA stats:

Terminal passengers: 6,959 (compared to 11,810 passengers in October and 11,273 in November 2019 - November 2020 was badly impacted by covid)
  • Aberdeen: 1,596 (+3% versus October and +4% vs November 2019)
  • Belfast City: 503 (compared to 685 in October)
  • Heathrow: 1,398 (compared to 1,448 in October)
  • Alicante: 2,550 (compared to 2,456 in October)
  • Amsterdam: 888 (compared to 715 in October)
  • Plus 24 on charters to/from Luton
Overall numbers have dropped compared to October due to the ending of seasonal routes to Palma, Corfu, Faro and Newquay and are down on pre-covid levels due to the lack of demand/flights to Amsterdam which was regularly pulling in 10,000 a month 2 years ago. Aberdeen is in line with pre-covid levels but nowhere near the circa 2,500 a month when Loganair and Eastern were going head to head. Belfast dropped in November due to fewer rotations but loads were higher than October. Heathrow loads continue to grow and were 14.6 in November (12.5 in October, 11.5 in September and 9.9 in August).

Alicante loads continue to be impressive at 142 per flight in November - plus loads and overall passenger numbers were both higher than October (which included half term). Loads to Amsterdam have been in the mid 30s for the past 3 months and passenger numbers seem unlikely to improve until KLM restore multiple daily flights.
tigertanaka is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 20:20
  #887 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another way of looking at it …7000 total passengers means 3500 outbound(ish)..means 117 passengers per day flying out of a £100 million pound airport in November. Ouch again..
highwideandugly is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 20:30
  #888 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 35
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by highwideandugly
Figures out for November…ouch….4/5k down on comparable years 2018 and 2019.

Looking forward to the mayor’s spin on that🙈
Highwide, can you please stop making it sound like the airport has somehow lost the passengers, how in the blue hell are 2018 and 2019 comparable years to the last two?!

If it's not the negative brigade it's people who think they are informed but are actually clueless
Cautious Optimist is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 20:52
  #889 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Highwide has a point in that while the last 2 years have been awful... MME will need to show a significant improvement soon.
The pot of money to support MME will not last forever
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 21:27
  #890 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by highwideandugly
Figures out for November…ouch….4/5k down on comparable years 2018 and 2019.

Looking forward to the mayor’s spin on that🙈

A lot of TVCA money riding on improvements..but suspect December will be similar?
Duty Free and Spa(opening soon) will be offering some pretty good discounts I think!

Back in 2018/9. KLM were just under 10k on two flights a day. KLM for November were only a couple flights a week with only an evening flight.

December saw KLM change the flight time to a dinnertime flight. This should boost their figures in December, but only way they are going to jump considerably is for the morning flights to start and last flight of evening to return. But also figures hampered by the Dutch having real tight covid restrictions, which could still hamper KLM figures.
Harold77 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 22:02
  #891 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
Highwide has a point in that while the last 2 years have been awful... MME will need to show a significant improvement soon.
The pot of money to support MME will not last forever
Agreed, when considering the amount of investment ploughed in to the airport over the past 2 years, those pax numbers are concerning to say the least and ultimately unsustainable!
SKOJB is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 22:33
  #892 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was always expected with the Summer season over and number of routes finished til next year that passenger numbers drop away, especially with covid having a considerable effect.

Aircraft Movements are up by nearly 230 compared to November 2019.

Amsterdam figures going in the right direction. This should improve further as the flight was brought forward to dinnertime in December, but the Dutch increased covid restrictions in December. So if December figures go pear shaped even with earlier flight then this will be down to the Dutch Covid restrictions.
What is really required to see numbers jump considerably for KLM is for the morning flight and evening return flights to be reinstasted. As this will open up day trip, business meetings and connections markets thus fueling demand and numbers increase significantly.

Aberdeen passengers slightly up on 2019.

Belfast passengers have seen a drop compared to recent months but this to be expected as travel season has passed, but also covid restrictions in Northern Ireland could be having effect. December should be interesting to see with Christmas travel for family.

Heathrow slightly down compared to previous months but still roughly in same area as previous months.

Alicante seeing its best month so far this year. It is great to see that demand is increasing for the Ryanair international flights.


So looking broadly this financial year compared to 2019 for flight movements:
April -3%
May +12%
June +63%
July +51%
August +48%
September +11%
October +21%
November +16%

This is a good indication that the Airport is heading the right direction. It is not all about passenger flights for the airport, there is much much more to activities. Increased military activity with the Draken fleet. So even with the loss of the summer routes, aircraft movements are still climbing. So going off the aircraft movements alone shows really impressive improvements.

The Airport is in a really good postition going into 2022. Just need the remaining Covid restrictions lifted worldwide then Teesside Airport can start to boom.

The benchmark to see how the Airport is performing is to compare it with 2019.

What a few on here, on facebook and media are doing are just looking at figures alone, they are not looking at the figures in context to which they represent. It is only when you look at them in the full context that you see a different picture and a one that shows positivity in the gloom. The over riding factor is Covid, if you look at the figures without having Covid as context then you get a false impression.

If Covid never happened and a full timetable was in operation, then passenger numbers would have been soaring this past year and would have been easily in the region of 350-400k for 2021.
Yes the 2020-21 financial year was awful which was soley down to Covid.
The 2021-22 financial year is going to be a bit grim to read, but there will be a lot more context to look into than the headline figures will read. Effects of Covid along with big investments will have to be taken into account when looking at the 2021-22 financial report. So don't go moaning when you see the financial results headlines.

Teesside Airport has faired better than other Airports going into Covid. Teesside had a low starting point so not much to be lost compared with other Airports. Having Draken, IAS Medical and Fire School has kept airfield operations ticking over throughout the past two years.
Harold77 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2022, 23:51
  #893 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 35
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Covid is only a temporary setback if a lengthy one, the capacity on all routes reflects the potential of the route during normal times, if anything it falls short, and I would hope the airport is looking at it from this point of view and not panicking over a couple of years worth of poor figures that can be attributed to Covid and not performance.
Cautious Optimist is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2022, 06:38
  #894 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,555
Received 89 Likes on 61 Posts
H77 and CO are absolutely right, we need to see what happens when the Covid clouds clear. A few comments though

What is really required to see numbers jump considerably for KLM is for the morning flight and evening return flights to be reinstasted. As this will open up day trip, business meetings and connections markets thus fueling demand and numbers increase significantly.
But the airline which knows the Teesside market better than anybody has been slow to re-instate flights and has offered a bare minimum service so far

Heathrow slightly down compared to previous months but still roughly in same area as previous months.
While we wait for the world to get back to normal, normal didn't include regional jets on domestic services into LHR. LHR have also just increased their charges, and changes at Darlington and Middlesbrough have increased competition from the trains.

Alicante seeing its best month so far this year. It is great to see that demand is increasing for the Ryanair international flights.
It'll be a very interesting summer for RYR - they are a game-changer for the airport in terms of the numbers they bring through the terminal and so make the most of the money that has been spent on it. Take RYR away and the terminal as it was could easily have handled KLM, LM and the other odds and sods.

Having Draken, IAS Medical and Fire School has kept airfield operations ticking over throughout the past two years.
Agreed - passenger numbers aren't the be all and end all and a diversity of operations helps keep the business robust. However, southside development still slow/non-existent, and in a covid period where similar companies have been filling their boots, Willis have been very quiet.

And on a completely different point, does anybody else have problems seeing H77's posts? I can see they are there from the main menu but don't see anything when I open the thread until somebody posts a reply after. Very odd - never seen anything like it before, any ideas?





SWBKCB is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2022, 07:04
  #895 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
I was wondering if he was being moderated.
N707ZS is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2022, 14:15
  #896 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SWBKCB

And on a completely different point, does anybody else have problems seeing H77's posts? I can see they are there from the main menu but don't see anything when I open the thread until somebody posts a reply after. Very odd - never seen anything like it before, any ideas?
I am on moderation. I think it is with being a new member that they have new members on moderation to see what they are like, before they let me off the leash. Hence why it says I've replied and it is not showing up immediately until later after my post has been approved. So you have to check back up a few posts to find out what I've said. (Same with this post)
Harold77 is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2022, 21:19
  #897 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on the border line
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great posts..you are moderated in my view! Has been strange though!
highwideandugly is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2022, 11:22
  #898 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 35
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting that the airport is looking for as many as 10 new firefighters, that's an entirely new Watch isn't it?
Cautious Optimist is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2022, 11:31
  #899 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cautious Optimist
Interesting that the airport is looking for as many as 10 new firefighters, that's an entirely new Watch isn't it?
Possibly a night watch or a overall upgrade of fire cover through out the day.

All of which could hint at either night flights or extended fire cat cover for based low cost!
onion is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2022, 12:57
  #900 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: North Yorkshire
Age: 33
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Without wanting to be a negative Nancy, is this not just to stop a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul? Quick look at the notams suggests Cat’s range from 3 to 4 then up to Cat 7 for a 737-800. So to save having to move staff around in the summer for the odd FR on flying days have a set of fire fighters across all watches to up to Cat 7 on those days?
jorvik is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.