Quarantine if you arrive from Spain from midnight 25/7/2020
Flashes from the Archives of Oblivion
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 72
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1000 km
Whilst it is clear that there are flare-ups in some areas of Mainland Spain, flare-ups that are certainly cause for concern, Covid 19 is firmly under control in here the Canary Islands. In Lanzarote for example, we have 11 active cases.
2 being English tourists with the remainder being 9 people from a boat bringing illegal immigrants from the African Continent.
Flights and Holidays from thev UK are stiil permitted but the 2 week quarantine rule still applies.
The Islands are located 1000km from Mainland Spain, the Covid numbers are extremely low.
The decision to include them in the quarantine rules, seems like a badly thought out, knee jerk reaction from a government, who throughout this entire crisis, has appeared at times, clueless in its actions !
2 being English tourists with the remainder being 9 people from a boat bringing illegal immigrants from the African Continent.
Flights and Holidays from thev UK are stiil permitted but the 2 week quarantine rule still applies.
The Islands are located 1000km from Mainland Spain, the Covid numbers are extremely low.
The decision to include them in the quarantine rules, seems like a badly thought out, knee jerk reaction from a government, who throughout this entire crisis, has appeared at times, clueless in its actions !
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This does not seem right..
Turkey has a similar increase in the number of cases of coronavirus reaching 927 cases compared with Spain’s 971. Will Raab impose the same quarantine restrictions on U.K. holidaymakers returning back from Turkey?
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: leeds
Age: 76
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jadrolinija
It is like saying "dead people will die anyway one day.
Economy pays for food. Pays doctors and medical personnel that won't work for free. It is interesting to see how everyone underestimates economy power. Economic fallout brings people on a street, revolutions, mental illness and depression, higher crime rate resulting in more killed than died due to virus.
And if this virus lasts for 10 years, we should #stayathome until 2030?
Economy pays for food. Pays doctors and medical personnel that won't work for free. It is interesting to see how everyone underestimates economy power. Economic fallout brings people on a street, revolutions, mental illness and depression, higher crime rate resulting in more killed than died due to virus.
And if this virus lasts for 10 years, we should #stayathome until 2030?
At the moment there is a reasonable chance of a successful vaccine, If that bet fails then we move on to living with the virus long term and that will change the shape of international travel among other things, not because of Governments but because of human behaviour.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please do not make me laugh...
Originally Posted by jon01
TUI cancelled all holidays to Spain now I believe
All thanks to Michael O Leary starting flights too early and putting pressure on the Government to drop the quarantine
All thanks to Michael O Leary starting flights too early and putting pressure on the Government to drop the quarantine
Originally Posted by bcn_boy
Turkey has a similar increase in the number of cases of coronavirus reaching 927 cases compared with Spain’s 971. Will Raab impose the same quarantine restrictions on U.K. holidaymakers returning back from Turkey?
The important things is cases per million of population - ie you worry more if similiar number of cases in a small population than a big population. A country with a bigger population would be expected to have more cases
927 cases in 83m people = 11 cases per million Turks
971 cases in 47m people = 21 cases per million Spaniards
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes they can have it both ways
Originally Posted by ATNotts
LTNman
The government is damned if they do, and damned if they don't. Over face masks they got a kicking for delaying their introduction; now they're getting a kicking for acting swiftly. The media, and the people, can't have it both ways.
The government is damned if they do, and damned if they don't. Over face masks they got a kicking for delaying their introduction; now they're getting a kicking for acting swiftly. The media, and the people, can't have it both ways.
Clearly this is a disaster for all business connected to international travel. Anything but the most essential travel is going to be seen as unnacceptably risky for most.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The government is damned if they do, and damned if they don't. Over face masks they got a kicking for delaying their introduction; now they're getting a kicking for acting swiftly. The media, and the people, can't have it both ways.
Originally Posted by PiggyBack
Actually the media can (and do) have it both ways, regularily. That is perhaps why the political system is becoming increasingly disfunctional a process that has reached its apogee, or should that be nadir, in the US. When everything - the prudent and the inprudent, the consistent and the inconsistent, the rational and the irrational is criticsed in the same way it opens the door for politics completely disconnected from evidence, facts and analysis.
Clearly this is a disaster for all business connected to international travel. Anything but the most essential travel is going to be seen as unacceptably risky for most.
Clearly this is a disaster for all business connected to international travel. Anything but the most essential travel is going to be seen as unacceptably risky for most.
It is disturbing, on an aviation forum to read the point of view that you can't be too fast AND too slow to deal with a problem, or that your response could be inappropriately active AND inappropriately inactive.
So it is no good excusing government response with "Damned if they do...".
You need to do the right thing at the right time. That's why they are in the left seat!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@16204
You seem to have completely misunderstood the point of my post and that of ATNotts.
Everyone woudl agree that the government should do the right thing although I don't think everyone would necessarily agree what that is, and it often isn't clear.
I think decisions abput Covid19 should be biased towards a faster response and more action than less action as regards trying to control transmission for all sorts of reasons not relevant to this post. However the point of my post is that whatever the government does even if it is in line with experience and expert opinion they will be criticised and the point of ATNotts post and my post is that they will be criticised for those decisions even when the same media outlets were calling for the decision concerned and criticising them in the immediate past for not making the same decision. This is the reality and I don't think you should be disturbed by reading it on a forum, aviation or otherwise.
What you should be diusturbed by is the corrosive affect this uniform treatment of all actions justified or unjustified, reasonable and unreasonable is having on the political culture and governance of western democracies generally.
You seem to have completely misunderstood the point of my post and that of ATNotts.
Everyone woudl agree that the government should do the right thing although I don't think everyone would necessarily agree what that is, and it often isn't clear.
I think decisions abput Covid19 should be biased towards a faster response and more action than less action as regards trying to control transmission for all sorts of reasons not relevant to this post. However the point of my post is that whatever the government does even if it is in line with experience and expert opinion they will be criticised and the point of ATNotts post and my post is that they will be criticised for those decisions even when the same media outlets were calling for the decision concerned and criticising them in the immediate past for not making the same decision. This is the reality and I don't think you should be disturbed by reading it on a forum, aviation or otherwise.
What you should be diusturbed by is the corrosive affect this uniform treatment of all actions justified or unjustified, reasonable and unreasonable is having on the political culture and governance of western democracies generally.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
Population of Spain is 47m while Turkey is 83m
The important things is cases per million of population - ie you worry more if similiar number of cases in a small population than a big population. A country with a bigger population would be expected to have more cases
927 cases in 83m people = 11 cases per million Turks
971 cases in 47m people = 21 cases per million Spaniards
The important things is cases per million of population - ie you worry more if similiar number of cases in a small population than a big population. A country with a bigger population would be expected to have more cases
927 cases in 83m people = 11 cases per million Turks
971 cases in 47m people = 21 cases per million Spaniards
If the data cannot be relied upon, then we are into the realms of guesswork and it becomes impossible for ordinary people without access to MI6 to form any sort of conclusion
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Piggyback:
Unjustified or unreasonable actions should attract scrutiny. That isn’t really corrosive to democracy.
If I misunderstand your stance I apologise. ATNotts seemed to suggest that some actions were criticised for being too slow, and some for being too fast. Yes, I believe this is the case, regardless of the media position . There’s no inconsistency in these criticisms.
Unjustified or unreasonable actions should attract scrutiny. That isn’t really corrosive to democracy.
If I misunderstand your stance I apologise. ATNotts seemed to suggest that some actions were criticised for being too slow, and some for being too fast. Yes, I believe this is the case, regardless of the media position . There’s no inconsistency in these criticisms.
Originally Posted by El Grifo
The decision to include them in the quarantine rules, seems like a badly thought out, knee jerk reaction from a government, who throughout this entire crisis, has appeared at times, clueless in its actions !
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bcn_boy
But is this the calculation that the Government is using? Doubtful. Turkey hides it’s official number similar to China yet this Government designates it as a safe destination knowing fully that this is a lie.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PiggyBack
@16204
You seem to have completely misunderstood the point of my post and that of ATNotts.
Everyone woudl agree that the government should do the right thing although I don't think everyone would necessarily agree what that is, and it often isn't clear.
I think decisions abput Covid19 should be biased towards a faster response and more action than less action as regards trying to control transmission for all sorts of reasons not relevant to this post. However the point of my post is that whatever the government does even if it is in line with experience and expert opinion they will be criticised and the point of ATNotts post and my post is that they will be criticised for those decisions even when the same media outlets were calling for the decision concerned and criticising them in the immediate past for not making the same decision. This is the reality and I don't think you should be disturbed by reading it on a forum, aviation or otherwise.
What you should be diusturbed by is the corrosive affect this uniform treatment of all actions justified or unjustified, reasonable and unreasonable is having on the political culture and governance of western democracies generally.
You seem to have completely misunderstood the point of my post and that of ATNotts.
Everyone woudl agree that the government should do the right thing although I don't think everyone would necessarily agree what that is, and it often isn't clear.
I think decisions abput Covid19 should be biased towards a faster response and more action than less action as regards trying to control transmission for all sorts of reasons not relevant to this post. However the point of my post is that whatever the government does even if it is in line with experience and expert opinion they will be criticised and the point of ATNotts post and my post is that they will be criticised for those decisions even when the same media outlets were calling for the decision concerned and criticising them in the immediate past for not making the same decision. This is the reality and I don't think you should be disturbed by reading it on a forum, aviation or otherwise.
What you should be diusturbed by is the corrosive affect this uniform treatment of all actions justified or unjustified, reasonable and unreasonable is having on the political culture and governance of western democracies generally.
Originally Posted by ATNotts
As I have posted on the Jet2 thread, i realised this morning why the Balearics and Canaries can't be exempted - and it's probably down not to risk, but to the Home Office arrival declaration form that has no field to enter the region or city that you are returning from; just the country.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I don't think that's the reason. The system seems to be able to cope with a restriction on Portugal, but one which exempts arrivals from Madeira and the Azores.
I have just checked the gov.uk website, and neither The Azores nor Madeira are excluded, unless I am missing something.
Last edited by ATNotts; 27th Jul 2020 at 14:36.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by inOban
I keep reading claims that Turkey and/or China are lying. I've yet to see any evidence. The usual check is the number of excess deaths above the normal for the time of year.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Modern media
Originally Posted by 16024
Piggyback:
Unjustified or unreasonable actions should attract scrutiny. That isn’t really corrosive to democracy.
If I misunderstand your stance I apologise. ATNotts seemed to suggest that some actions were criticised for being too slow, and some for being too fast. Yes, I believe this is the case, regardless of the media position . There’s no inconsistency in these criticisms.
Unjustified or unreasonable actions should attract scrutiny. That isn’t really corrosive to democracy.
If I misunderstand your stance I apologise. ATNotts seemed to suggest that some actions were criticised for being too slow, and some for being too fast. Yes, I believe this is the case, regardless of the media position . There’s no inconsistency in these criticisms.
What has corroded public discourse and politics is it doesn't matter what policy is followed it will be strongly criticised in emotive terms and it will be criticised in exactly the same terms whether it is reasonable or unreasonable. Moreover it will be criticised in the same strong terms even if the latest policy is following the advice given by the media in the last round of criticism. This has eroded faith in evidence, politics and the political system, experts, science in general and helped to undermine any consensus, common ground or cooperation between political rivals. You can se ethe results in the US and it is not a healthy situation. Constructive balanced criticism is not an issue. Synthetic outrage at everything trivialises and infantalises what are important decisions.
Originally Posted by EIFFS
There is, however this is a major reversal of policy that will likely have a devastating impact on recovery of our industry
Whilst I accept that they have adopted a rather wide interpretation of country/territory by including parts of Spain and other Spanish territories that, on the face of it, don't appear to be exhibiting increased infection rates, they have done exactly what they said they would do, and in a timely fashion. I don't think that could be described as a 'major reversal of policy'.
