Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Flybe-9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2018, 18:59
  #721 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know we have been through this before but Welsh Government lent money to Cardiff Airport. Cardiff Airport used the money to subsidise Flybe. Cardiff Airport expects to make enough money at the back end of the deal to repay the Government. If any of that goes wrong there will be a huge political row and accusations of state subsidy and unfair competition. It wouldn’t be the same as a private sector airport shrugging their shoulders and regretting their bad call.
runway30 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:12
  #722 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Reversethrustset
There is no way on God's earth that Saad would've got into a deal with CWL or DSA that Flybe couldn't get out of very easily. I think it'll be alot easier than you think for Flybe to pull the plug.
If you don’t believe these ten year deals are enforceable, can I point you in the direction of Durham Tees Valley Ltd. v. Bmibaby Ltd.
runway30 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:17
  #723 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 43
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tom7130
I would have to say DUS ABZ SOU and EXT i can’t see them closing BHX or MAN as they would have to find a place to fly over 20+ aircraft
Thank goodness you’re not in charge as I’d have thought SOU was their cash cow and EXT is a safe haven with a captive audience, hence at the very back of the queue for closure.
AirportPlanner1 is online now  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:40
  #724 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Reversethrustset
There is no way on God's earth that Saad would've got into a deal with CWL or DSA that Flybe couldn't get out of very easily. I think it'll be alot easier than you think for Flybe to pull the plug.
I'm sure Flybe could pull out at anytime they wanted but why would they as both airports have been willing to subsidise or help those bases so why would they pull out?
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:43
  #725 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by runway30
I know we have been through this before but Welsh Government lent money to Cardiff Airport. Cardiff Airport used the money to subsidise Flybe. Cardiff Airport expects to make enough money at the back end of the deal to repay the Government. If any of that goes wrong there will be a huge political row and accusations of state subsidy and unfair competition. It wouldn’t be the same as a private sector airport shrugging their shoulders and regretting their bad call.
The Welsh government loans are already being paid back by the airport on a commercial basis by Cardiff Airport Ltd.
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:45
  #726 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CWL is still growing but I think there's room for improvement. Lets not forget this is an average analysis of fare price. Some routes may be performing much better than others. It was an E195 base until earlier this year where it's not 3x E75, so probably more empty seats flying around until those changes. That being said there's a number of domestic routes from CWL that could be downgraded to the Dash. Would a mixed crew base of Embraer and Dash actually make it more efficient?
What we also don't know is if Project Blackbird had payments up front or payments over the term of the contract. I would suspect the latter, meaning continual income from the base over the period of the contract. If it was up front then BE could take the money and run.
I would've thought a consolidation of poor performing routes over base closures would be better. BE could be making good money off some routes which may not be able to be operated if a base closes completely.
caaardiff is online now  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:49
  #727 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by runway30
If you don’t believe these ten year deals are enforceable, can I point you in the direction of Durham Tees Valley Ltd. v. Bmibaby Ltd.
Have you read the decision? It is not about whether or not such deals are enforceable, it is about whether the wording of the contract in question constituted a right to operate or a duty to operate. If Flybe has learned anything from that decision, it will have the correct wording in place.

That aside, the interesting questions are:
1) Did bmibaby operate until 2014 out of DTV because of that contract?
2) Did DTV recuperate the monies paid to bmibaby?
3) Has DTV been able to lure lots of new airlines to its shores after having sued bmibaby as a matter of principle?

Long story short, if Flybe needs to dump CWL or DSA in order to survive, they will happily do so and suggest the airports to sue them and find out if Flybe will be around long enough to see the end of court proceedings and debt collection - and if so, if that will or will not be the final straw for BE. In the meantime, no more flights from the only remaining regional airline in the UK from anywhere to these airports. It is really not so much a legal as a practical issue for all parties involved.

I would've thought a consolidation of poor performing routes over base closures would be better. BE could be making good money off some routes which may not be able to be operated if a base closes completely.
Base closures do not necessarily mean the end of operations at the airport in question.
virginblue is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 19:53
  #728 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by caaardiff
CWL is still growing but I think there's room for improvement. Lets not forget this is an average analysis of fare price. Some routes may be performing much better than others. It was an E195 base until earlier this year where it's not 3x E75, so probably more empty seats flying around until those changes. That being said there's a number of domestic routes from CWL that could be downgraded to the Dash. Would a mixed crew base of Embraer and Dash actually make it more efficient?
What we also don't know is if Project Blackbird had payments up front or payments over the term of the contract. I would suspect the latter, meaning continual income from the base over the period of the contract. If it was up front then BE could take the money and run.
I would've thought a consolidation of poor performing routes over base closures would be better. BE could be making good money off some routes which may not be able to be operated if a base closes completely.
My feeling is that BE took money at the front end and Cardiff Airport made money on the back end. There has to be a reason why the 195s have been replaced with 175s but with about the same total capacity. Maybe something written into the contract.
runway30 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 20:00
  #729 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Bedworth
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AirportPlanner1


Thank goodness you’re not in charge as I’d have thought SOU was their cash cow and EXT is a safe haven with a captive audience, hence at the very back of the queue for closure.
I see you point but I think that they would focus on their biggest bases. I would probably close EMA and then cancel the routes out of LHR if they were an option
tom7130 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 20:01
  #730 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by virginblue
Have you read the decision? It is not about whether or not such deals are enforceable, it is about whether the wording of the contract in question constituted a right to operate or a duty to operate. If Flybe has learned anything from that decision, it will have the correct wording in place.

That aside, the interesting questions are:
1) Did bmibaby operate until 2014 out of DTV because of that contract?
2) Did DTV recuperate the monies paid to bmibaby?
3) Has DTV been able to lure lots of new airlines to its shores after having sued bmibaby as a matter of principle?

Long story short, if Flybe needs to dump CWL or DSA in order to survive, they will happily do so and suggest the airports to sue them and find out if Flybe will be around long enough to see the end of court proceedings and debt collection - and if so, if that will or will not be the final straw for BE. In the meantime, no more flights from the only remaining regional airline in the UK from anywhere to these airports. It is really not so much a legal as a practical issue for all parties involved.



Base closures do not necessarily mean the end of operations at the airport in question.
Yes, I have read the decision and I looked at it from the other side. If I was the Airport I would make certain it said duty to operate.

Where you have a Public Accounts Committee scrutinising everything you do, you wouldn’t always make the correct commercial decision.
runway30 is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2018, 22:33
  #731 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Crawley
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It’s all speculation at the mo let’s wait for the announcement from BE. Most of us here don’t know how routes / based are performing and which aren’t so we can all say oh CWL or EXT will close but it’s meaningless.
bycrewlgw is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 11:31
  #732 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does Flybe own its LHR slots i.e. can it sell them profitably.
22/04 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 11:36
  #733 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 22/04
Does Flybe own its LHR slots i.e. can it sell them profitably.
No - they do not own them. The slots were part of the BA and BMI merger. A certain number of slots were ring-fenced for a domestic 2nd airline. But not sure how one goes about applying to operate them or indeed whether they have to re-apply from time to time.
shamrock7seal is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 13:21
  #734 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Extensive feature on Flybe in the current issue of Airliner World. We all know what this means...

Only ray of hope is that they are not the cover feature...
virginblue is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 13:26
  #735 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by virginblue
Extensive feature on Flybe in the current issue of Airliner World. We all know what this means...

Only ray of hope is that they are not the cover feature...
.......and what does this mean please?.....
tophat27dt is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 16:54
  #736 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Multiple people in the past have noticed that in a remarkably large number of case, an airline with a large feature article in Airliner World has gone bust shortly afterwards. I have yet to see any proper statistical analysis to see if there really is a correlation or it's just people remembering the most obvious cases in the past. Regardless, it's become a bit of urban legend
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 17:04
  #737 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: On the road
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tom7130

I see you point but I think that they would focus on their biggest bases. I would probably close EMA and then cancel the routes out of LHR if they were an option
EMA isn't a base. All routes are either served inbound from bases or as an inside W pattern e.g. AMS
TartinTon is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 20:18
  #738 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shamrock7seal
No - they do not own them. The slots were part of the BA and BMI merger. A certain number of slots were ring-fenced for a domestic 2nd airline. But not sure how one goes about applying to operate them or indeed whether they have to re-apply from time to time.
my understanding was that the routes need to be operated for a period of three routes on the specifics routes, at which time they can be used for whatever the airline want. I'd be amazed if Flybe are making a good return on these. The three year thing was pedalled online when Virgin little red was operating..

With fuel prices so high Flybe will need rapid and effective action in their current situation. Some serious network pruning I imagine will come ...
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2018, 20:43
  #739 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EI-BUD
my understanding was that the routes need to be operated for a period of three routes on the specifics routes, at which time they can be used for whatever the airline want. I'd be amazed if Flybe are making a good return on these. The three year thing was pedalled online when Virgin little red was operating..

With fuel prices so high Flybe will need rapid and effective action in their current situation. Some serious network pruning I imagine will come ...
Yet they wanted to add a 5th LHR-EDI flight so the route can't be doing that badly.
PDXCWL45 is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2018, 09:31
  #740 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mwm991
Are CWL and DSA not subsidised?
Cardiff is. Doncaster isn’t anymore, contract was rewritten (as far as I was aware) due to the fact that the base was making money and flybe werent getting all of that profit due to the blackbird contract agreement. So they have “gone it alone”.

My understanding is both based are doing well and loads are good. I don’t buy into these base closures, why close a base that is profitable?? You’d still have the issue of where to base the aircraft and the headache of crew redundancies.
Alwayslistening is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.