Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Manchester-2

Old 12th Apr 2019, 12:04
  #2941 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MCT
Posts: 831
Originally Posted by Betablockeruk View Post
Artist's impression clearly shows a gap between the airbridge and the 747 on 106 and that's what they have delivered.

Very good - like it
Suzeman is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2019, 15:29
  #2942 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 600
Originally Posted by azz767 View Post
Whilst I admit it really isn't great, wont it in the long run not actually be a major problem, I say this because:
(I am in no way excusing the shoddiness of the situation, just looking at it from a different perspective)


1. Surely learning from pier 1, this wont be allowed to happen on pier 2/3.
2 There's surely going to be enough stands capable of handling the 747's from the existing T2 even whilst the second pier is getting built.
3. When pier 2/3 are built, isn't the likelihood that most VS will park in those two closer to the new lounges leaving pier 1 to Loco's/charters.
4. How many A350's, 747's etc, will be on the ground max at any one time? Wont there be enough stands in pier 2/3 to cope with these if the pier 1 issue can't be sorted? I know that's not the point but it should be manageable right?
Virgin Atlantic Set To Retire Boeing 747s In 2021

That timeline probably makes it a non issue unless the A350 is also a problem?
Betablockeruk is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2019, 15:45
  #2943 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,128
Originally Posted by Betablockeruk View Post
Virgin Atlantic Set To Retire Boeing 747s In 2021

That timeline probably makes it a non issue unless the A350 is also a problem?
Thats an easy escape for the project teams failure, one of the most important aspects of the pier and they got it wrong.

Hopefully they pay more attention on the next phase.
EI-EIDW is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2019, 08:21
  #2944 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,908
Originally Posted by azz767 View Post
Whilst I admit it really isn't great, wont it in the long run not actually be a major problem, I say this because:
(I am in no way excusing the shoddiness of the situation, just looking at it from a different perspective)


1. Surely learning from pier 1, this wont be allowed to happen on pier 2/3.
2 There's surely going to be enough stands capable of handling the 747's from the existing T2 even whilst the second pier is getting built.
3. When pier 2/3 are built, isn't the likelihood that most VS will park in those two closer to the new lounges leaving pier 1 to Loco's/charters.
4. How many A350's, 747's etc, will be on the ground max at any one time? Wont there be enough stands in pier 2/3 to cope with these if the pier 1 issue can't be sorted? I know that's not the point but it should be manageable right?
4 350’s SQ X2, QR AND CX at the moment! VS 3 744’s I think.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2019, 19:16
  #2945 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 69
Posts: 789
Spannersatcx - Having been working off only a mobile for the last few weeks I have missed a couple of important OANs that have been issued, and which make interesting reading, since there is no reference to Stand 104 being able to accept B747

OAN-26a-2019 Issued 29th March 2019



OAN-26b-2019 Issued 5th April 2019

Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 06:07
  #2946 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham
Age: 58
Posts: 657
Etihad A388

Good to see A6-APD will be on EY21 today
BHX5DME is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 10:36
  #2947 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,908
Originally Posted by Scottie Dog View Post
Spannersatcx - Having been working off only a mobile for the last few weeks I have missed a couple of important OANs that have been issued, and which make interesting reading, since there is no reference to Stand 104 being able to accept B747

OAN-26a-2019 Issued 29th March 2019



OAN-26b-2019 Issued 5th April 2019

looking at that none of them are! no mention of the 350 either! can get a 777-9 on 106 though, shame there's none actually flying!
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 10:39
  #2948 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,924
Looking at the aerial view of the three piers, I am wondering why all three appear to be different in length, particularly why the middle one is rather short? Is the area around it earmarked for walk boarding by LCCs so that investment in an extension of the shed and throwing in another set of airbridges was not worthwhile?
virginblue is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 14:27
  #2949 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 155
Is the Etihad A380 going to have to park remote? I thought the stand that Emirates use is the only contact stand that is A380 compatible and the Etihad plane will be in at the same time as the 3rd Emirates of the day and I doubt Emirates will be too pleased if they get budged off their stand.
azz767 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 15:03
  #2950 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Northern province
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by azz767 View Post
Is the Etihad A380 going to have to park remote? I thought the stand that Emirates use is the only contact stand that is A380 compatible and the Etihad plane will be in at the same time as the 3rd Emirates of the day and I doubt Emirates will be too pleased if they get budged off their stand.
Etihad A380?
Lancaster Bomber is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 15:27
  #2951 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Stansted Airport
Posts: 159
Originally Posted by BHX5DME View Post
Good to see A6-APD will be on EY21 today
Its got a load to match too. 464 passengers onboard just 30 of its total.
Nice treat for all you MAN spotters to see one of Etihad's A380ís
STN406 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 16:21
  #2952 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 26
Anyone know why Etihad was sending an A380? Was it planned or a substitution?
ld0595 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 16:33
  #2953 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,022
virginblue,

a MAG presentation I attended last year indicated that it may be extended further in the future. As someone in the audience pointed out, that would involve turning the airside into a secure land-side building site-again, with all the cost/inconvenience that would involve.
Just borrow the money and build it now.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 18:05
  #2954 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Manchester
Posts: 27
Originally Posted by ld0595 View Post
Anyone know why Etihad was sending an A380? Was it planned or a substitution?
From what I heard, equipment shortage. 77W not available.
LFC22 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 20:40
  #2955 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Uk
Posts: 155
Originally Posted by azz767 View Post
Is the Etihad A380 going to have to park remote? I thought the stand that Emirates use is the only contact stand that is A380 compatible and the Etihad plane will be in at the same time as the 3rd Emirates of the day and I doubt Emirates will be too pleased if they get budged off their stand.
Does anyone know what happened re parking?
azz767 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2019, 21:23
  #2956 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: stockport
Posts: 89
Went on 62

Ian
chaps1954 is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2019, 18:13
  #2957 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,908
Originally Posted by spannersatcx View Post

Iím told the 350 was trialled on 110, the airbridge wouldnít get to the L2 door without hitting the engine and was 2 feet short of the L1 door. Was supposed to be trialled on 106 today but has been postponed until next week. L2 door is the preferred door so not everyone traipses through the business class section.
Apparently the A350 went on 106 without any issues, so they can at least use one of the stands.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 16:11
  #2958 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 656
Facebook rumour alert...!

"Juneyao Air have applied to add MAN as an extension of its new daily PVG-HEL service, although the add on MAN would only be 4 weekly. They use Dreamliners on this route and MAN start from Nov 19."

Make of that what you will...
eggc is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 16:26
  #2959 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North West UK
Age: 64
Posts: 165
Originally Posted by eggc View Post
Facebook rumour alert...!

"Juneyao Air have applied to add MAN as an extension of its new daily PVG-HEL service, although the add on MAN would only be 4 weekly. They use Dreamliners on this route and MAN start from Nov 19."

Make of that what you will...
its noted elsewhere that they failed to obtain slots at LHR and accordingly have turned their attention to MAN.
eye2eye5 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2019, 20:50
  #2960 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Age: 48
Posts: 856
...its usually LGW first in that scenario!
VickersVicount is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.