Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Monarch 4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 21:24
  #741 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm thinking that the problems Monarch has had is actually very similar to the problems that airlines like BmiBaby, Bmi Mainline and CityJet have had or are having. You could argue that it's inappropriate to compare an insolvent winding up with an orderly wind down, a takeover and a change in business plan, but actually these were responses to the same problem. And in fact Monarch's trading situation wasn't actually that bad; while it did report a massive loss because of an accounting adjustment the underlying trading numbers weren't awful.

You could say it's about prices, but Monarch competed on that and the people still didn't come in sufficient numbers. You could say it's about destinations, but other airlines survived the same problems. You could say it's about product, but all sorts of airlines survive offering all sorts of products. Here you could say it was about ownership, but actually the one thing Greybull did do is put money in (they just didn't change anything so that it wouldn't keep on needing more).

The problem isn't any of the things anyone has mentioned, but I would argue in fact that it has become more difficult for an airline to differentiate and market themselves (and that Monarch didn't do particularly well at this). I think the problem all these airlines have had is that they were smaller versions of things that already existed, and therefore served a dubious purpose that couldn't be effectively marketed due to economies of scale?
01475 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 21:27
  #742 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seriously titan have a flight code ? Wow, learn something new everyday !
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 21:32
  #743 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cornishsimon
it's good to see others airlines stepping up so quickly
Nothing good about it, its plain business sense for them where fully trained staff are available and airlines crying out for fully trained staff,

If Mon had been flying 738's then FR would have been first in line.

Good look to all the staff and hope they get picked up quickly.
racedo is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 21:34
  #744 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South London
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pressurezero
Monarch's balance sheet alone, actually, isn't bad. Lots of cash available.
I pulled Monarch's Account for 2016 earlier today and had a quick read. While the cash line seemed reasonable, the big red flag was the negative reserves at the bottom of the Balance Sheet, some £500m from memory! The Note on Impairments made for uncomfortable reading as well. Nevertheless, a sad day for British aviation.
Tight Accountant is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 21:37
  #745 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Outer London
Age: 43
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cornishsimon
Seriously titan have a flight code ? Wow, learn something new everyday !

Titan fly various routes of their own out of STN - e.g. Chambery, Lourdes, Zadar, Calvi, Preveza. Dalaman in the near past. Plus various cruise flights and Lourdes pilgrimages from around the UK.
AirportPlanner1 is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 21:52
  #746 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: EU
Age: 54
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cornishsimon
Seriously titan have a flight code ? Wow, learn something new everyday !!!!!!
IATA: ZT
ICAO: AWC
Callsign: ZAP
DjerbaDevil is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 22:00
  #747 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: cornwall, uk
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry guys, that was my attempt to lighten the mood slightly, I'm aware of Titan/ZT, I'm aware they fly routes themselves, including freight.


likewise I'm aware that its good business for others to fill vacancies with trained and now redundant staff, its still good to see other airlines stepping up so quickly
cornishsimon is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 22:04
  #748 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southampton
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your not back tracking by any chance are you!
canberra97 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 22:27
  #749 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Delete me
Age: 58
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad

https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/news/...-airline-fails

British authorities are scrambling to bring home 110,000 travellers after Monarch Airlines collapsed, cancelling all flights by what had been Britain's fifth biggest carrier with 2100 employees.

The Civil Aviation Authority said it has leased 30 aircraft to transport Monarch customers scattered around holiday destinations ranging from Turkey to Spain and Sweden. Flights will be provided at no additional cost to passengers.

"This is a hugely distressing situation for British holidaymakers abroad, and my first priority is to help them get back to the UK,'' Transport Secretary Chris Grayling said in a statement. "That is why I have immediately ordered the country's biggest ever peacetime repatriation to fly about 110,000 passengers who could otherwise have been left stranded.''

Some 860,000 customers in all are affected, with 750,000 with future bookings.

Monarch ceased operations after failing to reach a deal with regulators to extend the company's license to sell package holidays to overseas destinations. Monarch Chief Executive Andrew Swaffield said the airline's troubles stemmed from recent terror attacks in Egypt and Tunisia and the "decimation'' of the tourist trade in Turkey.

The airline had tried to pivot from short-haul flights to long-haul travel to reduce losses as consumers shied away from Middle Eastern and North African destinations after the June 2015 attack on tourists at a resort in Tunisia, the bombing of a Russian airliner that had taken off from Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, a few months later and the attempted coup in Turkey in 2016.

The CAA is advising Monarch customers who are trying to get home from abroad to visit the agency's website for information about their flights. Passengers who were preparing to leave the UK on Monarch flights should not go to the airport.

The first repatriation flight carrying 165 passengers from the Spanish resort island of Ibiza has already arrived at London's Gatwick Airport, the aviation authority said.

"The scale and challenge of this operation means that some disruption is inevitable,'' agency CEO Andrew Haines said. "We ask customers to bear with us as we work around the clock to bring everyone home.''

Monarch's collapse represents the biggest ever failure of a British airline.

KPMG partner Blair Nimmo said administrators are now considering breaking up the company as no buyer has been found to purchase Monarch in its entirety. Counting the airline and tour operator business, the company had 2100 employees.

The airline said companies affected by its failure include Monarch Airlines, Monarch Holidays, First Aviation, Avro, and Somewhere2stay.

"All future holidays and flights provided by these companies have been cancelled and are no longer operating,'' the company said.

Among those affected was a British couple who had intended to fly to Gran Canaria with their family to get married.

Bricklayer Alan Jee, 42, was five minutes away from his scheduled flight time when he learned the news. The flights for 30 of his friends and family - including fiancee Donna Smith - were also affected.

"My missus just burst straight into tears, and my mother-in-law, and my mum,'' he said. "They (Monarch) are doing absolutely nothing about it whatsoever, they've palmed us off.''​
Infieldg is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 22:43
  #750 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPF now lose, so basically all UK taxpayers now Monarch has failed. They/we had a 10% stake in the airline. Could the Phoenix rise from the Admin ashes without this burden?
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 23:23
  #751 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Tight Accountant;9911778]I pulled Monarch's Account for 2016 earlier today and had a quick read. While the cash line seemed reasonable, the big red flag was the negative reserves at the bottom of the Balance Sheet, some £500m from memory! The Note on Impairments made for uncomfortable reading as well. Nevertheless, a sad day for British aviation.[/QUOTE

Shareholder funds had been wiped out which is probably what was causing concern at the CAA. It never ceases to amaze me that you can be an airline executive and be financially illiterate. If for every £1 coming in, £1.20 is going out of the door then there is no point in whinging about currency movements and terrorism or getting your new strategic plan considered by time wasting consultants, you have to take action to increase yield per passenger and reduce costs.
runway30 is online now  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 00:38
  #752 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't understand why the powers that be have hired a load of Qatar aircraft when there are lots of Monarch aircraft sitting on the ground, along with the crews, who are perfectly capable of going and fetching the stranded passengers.

I think that as soon as they went into administration the insurance would have been suspended. I have heard of cases where The Administrator has arranged and paid for insurance, fuel and crew to collect aircraft from far and wide and return them to either The Administrators, or the financiers of the aircraft's jurisdiction. Tends to happen someway into the process of liquidation when some money has become available.
parabellum is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 00:49
  #753 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But greybull sail off into the sunset with your taxpounds! Life's so fair!!
Burpbot is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 01:21
  #754 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is more to do with overseas ports; if Monarch owe landing fees, eurocontrol fees, fuel bills etc and one of their planes lands in their creditor's country then there is no way that it will be leaving in a hurry. The creditor would get a lien put on the airframe as quickly as they could get into the courthouse.

This will have happened in the UK too - but it is much easier for UK based administrators to deal with UK assets in a UK court than it is to have them stranded throughout Europe.
James 1077 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 01:29
  #755 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happens next

A very sad day for Monarch and particularly its crew, who have had to endure much uncertainty in the last couple of years.

The question is where to from here, what happens next? There will be many competitors interested in aspects of the company, in the current climate i'd guess in particular Gatwick slots and its pilots being most sought after...it has become most apparent with the current Ryanair situation how acute the pilot shortage is, though airbus rated, with deep pockets no doubt the conversion training could easily financed / funded.
The Gatwick slots will be the hottest topic, easyJet will want to maintain its stronghold and Monarch would appear to be the last and biggest opportunity for them to grow their largest base, jet2's success makes LGW a perfect dot on the map, and Ryanair otherwise would appear to be significantly preoccupied with their current challenges to be interested? Though taking Monarch lock stock and barrel could potenytially plug their short term woes and limit some of the reputation damage.. assuming if redeployed into the FR network?

Is a BA/IAG move to be expected? Norwegian would appear to be significantlyn committed with expansion plans at this stage ...
EI-BUD is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 01:40
  #756 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Krone
I would do your homework brfore joining CX as a Second Officer. A big kick in the pants if you were an SFO or Capt with Monarch. Simply put, a devastating drop in self respect and esteem if you become a radio operator and/ or bunk maker @ CX . Unless you are under 30, no chance.

HKA - they have a few planes on order but have a queue of Malaysian pilots inline to fill their needs. Theres no way they ever going to challeng CX on fleet size. More equatable to CXDragon.

Asia is not the answer for most, unless its china and the big $$$. But having 20 years in Monarch n going to china .. ffs thats a gutsy move .

CX is no direct entry Captain, and 10+ years to command for FOs (longer for SOs)

HKA better, but also suffers from very expensive cost of living in HK (you will end up in a tiny flat for £3000/month rent)

Air Macau pays similar to HKA (approx double the UK after tax), is cheaper to live, and *urgently* needs DECs, as well as experienced FOs for rapid command. 9/3 and 5/2 commuting patterns available.

Advert for FOs is here:
https://app.airmacau.com.mo:8080/rec...otice_TFO.html
Arrowhead is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 04:00
  #757 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Leeds
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well nice to see Mr Swaffield already busy with his new aviation consultancy company.

ALCEDO CONSULTING SERVICES LTD
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10990438
lee757 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 06:40
  #758 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One word about Titan. I see they have been using an A320 on repatriation flights from Gibraltar. Must have sexperienced flight deck crews familiar with the 'problems' associated with the airport.
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 07:18
  #759 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
I recall the delivery of G-AOVI in 1968, and have flown Monarch both long- and short-haul numerous times. This development is tragic, particularly for the staff.

I do wish that some of the idiots who post on this site blaming the management understood just what management can and can't do. They are subject to the law, the owners, and numerous other interests. I have no doubt that every manager (and they've lost their jobs too), did what they could under difficult circumstances.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 07:28
  #760 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LSG; A good point about the management but at some level there was a distinct lack of direction and product placement. It was no secret that their financial basis was unsound.
HZ123 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.