DUBLIN - 2
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cheers Jamie,
Dublin has often mirrored MAN when it comes to Etihad, so, this news is quite shocking.
I just didn't think things had got that bad for EY at Dublin. That said, EY website and all GDS platforms still taking bookings for 2 daily, so, I suppose it's a wait and see.
With EDI getting chopped to 5 weekly too, seems Etihad isn't quite able to keep up with the Joneses down in Dubai.
Dublin has often mirrored MAN when it comes to Etihad, so, this news is quite shocking.
I just didn't think things had got that bad for EY at Dublin. That said, EY website and all GDS platforms still taking bookings for 2 daily, so, I suppose it's a wait and see.
With EDI getting chopped to 5 weekly too, seems Etihad isn't quite able to keep up with the Joneses down in Dubai.
They were planning to provide average of 40,440 seats per month while the B777 will cut that to 24,720 while most winter months just gone were just over 25,000 mark while capacity was around 31,440 (2 A332) as they dropped 777 middle of last winter.
When they had 2 daily B777 (year round) it was average loads of 50%.
Airline route has amended tweet:
From 1 December 12 of 14 weekly bookable
From 1 January 7 of 14 weekly bookable
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What makes you think EK will keep 2 daily let alone 3 or an A380? The second EK had poor load factors whenever I flew with them so I thought 'most people who go to Asia or Aus must go through AUH'.
Of note, EY have their own dedicated business lounge at DUB. EK doesn't.
EK A380 or EY A380? Who is the planning permission for?
Of note, EY have their own dedicated business lounge at DUB. EK doesn't.
EK A380 or EY A380? Who is the planning permission for?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What makes you think EK will keep 2 daily let alone 3 or an A380? The second EK had poor load factors whenever I flew with them so I thought 'most people who go to Asia or Aus must go through AUH'.
Of note, EY have their own dedicated business lounge at DUB. EK doesn't.
EK A380 or EY A380? Who is the planning permission for?
Of note, EY have their own dedicated business lounge at DUB. EK doesn't.
EK A380 or EY A380? Who is the planning permission for?
2014 Loads
Jan - 96%
Feb - 89%
Mar - 93%
Apr - 94%
May - 92%
Jun - 100% +
Jul - 100% +
Aug - 100% +
Sep - 66% - Second started
Oct - 62%
Nov - 63%
Dec - 81%
2015 Loads
Jan - 77%
Feb - 57%
Mar - 71%
Apr - 72%
All based on 3 class but they did send quiet a few 2 class particularly during summer so not bothered looking at specifics.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for those figures Jamie. The figures DAA release always show an increase in numbers. If EY is reducing to 1x daily is there something wrong with Dublin Airports figures? You have 4x Daily to middle East giving following:
09th April -
15th May -
07th June -
15th July -
How many passengers would 4 daily 777's carry per month?
very interesting point EI-A330-300 - so our travel agents are not that independent?
EY had an interest in EI but that has now gone to AIG so whatever plans they had on that one are gone.
09th April -
Other international passenger traffic to the Middle East grew by 45% with just over 63,000 passengers travelling last month.
15th May -
Other international traffic, predominantly to the Middle East, recorded a 23% increase, as almost 62,000 passengers travelled
07th June -
Other international traffic, which includes flights to the Middle East, increased by 22% in May, with over 56,000 passengers travelling these routes during the month
15th July -
Other international traffic, which includes flights to two destinations in the Middle East and three to African destinations rose by 33%
How many passengers would 4 daily 777's carry per month?
EK have been very kind to travel agents
EY had an interest in EI but that has now gone to AIG so whatever plans they had on that one are gone.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have 4x Daily to middle East giving following:
daa figures are consistent with stats, here is March 15 v 14 for example:
Other international passenger traffic to the Middle East grew by 45% with just over 63,000 passengers travelling last month.
EY - 25,935, EK - 31,196 = 57.131
RAK - 2,865
AGA - 1,090
SSH - 1,490
Total - 62,576*
2014
EY - 20,662, EK - 20,719 = 41,381
AGA - 1,594
SSH - 557
Total - 43,532*
* - No including once off flights such as that to TLV on both years etc
EY loads over last few months
2014 - 6 777, 8 332
Jan - 83%
Feb - 64%
Mar - 66%
Apr - 84%
May - 68%
Jun - 82%
July - 87% - 10 -14 weekly (15/7)
Aug - 92%
Sep - 67%
Oct - 59%
Nov - 58%
Dec - 72%
2015
Jan - 70%
Feb - 68% - 2 daily A332 resumes
Mar - 80%
Apr - 80%
Show how B777 wasn't ever required and A330 improves numbers considerably however EY increase actual numbers year on year even with B777 gone.
_______
In other news Finnair will increase HEL by 1 weekly to make it daily from 27 March 16, another along wtih ADD who will be looking to increase eastern long haul services.
Last edited by Jamie2k9; 20th Aug 2015 at 09:37.
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Cork
Age: 47
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EI779 diversion to FAO
Have noticed and not for 1st time over past 2 weeks the ACE-DUB rotation diverting to FAO. EI779 diverted to FAO before proceeding to DUB from ACE on Monday evening any reason why this is occurring or was it medical related?
How are the ET IAD and YYZ pax counted? Are they included in the pax figures for Middle East and Africa or just as transit pax in general?
Also anybody know how are AA's loads holding up on CLT? I honestly thought they were going to drop it, not extend the season with an aircraft twice the size
Also anybody know how are AA's loads holding up on CLT? I honestly thought they were going to drop it, not extend the season with an aircraft twice the size
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very interesting point EI-A330-300 - so our travel agents are not that independent?
In unrelated news revised application for runway will likely be launched in the next few months possibly by December. While passenger numbers will be at required levels, anybody guess as to how long application will take and contracts to be signed.
If all went well construction could start by late 2016 and it has been estimated to take 36 months to complete.
Whenever the new runway opens (and it's been talked about for 20 odd years now) expect the current 10/28 to close shortly after for resurfacing and a new taxiway layout to be built
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whenever the new runway opens (and it's been talked about for 20 odd years now) expect the current 10/28 to close shortly after for resurfacing and a new taxiway layout to be built
That would require butting heads with the Portmarnock crowd again, they might not bother if the new runway is the 3,600m they now want, only the heavies will require more than the 2,600m already available. The DAA might not consider it worth their while.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would require butting heads with the Portmarnock crowd again, they might not bother if the new runway is the 3,600m they now want, only the heavies will require more than the 2,600m already available. The DAA might not consider it worth their while.
RY28 extension is 390m would be added and it would be 3,027m. Cost of 55 million and would require planning application, house buyout/insulation programme, 34/28 intersection re-profiled.
Not sure what the daa position is on this but they would of seriously considered if the cap was much higher for new one I think.
When speaking to some of my colleagues in DUB last year they said they and the DAA were going to try ammend the proposal for 3,600m, whether that's still the position I'm not sure, but they believed there was scope to do this in the existing planning permission granted?
Also from speaking to pilots based in Dublin, most think widening 10/28 is more of an issue for them. They say they prefer 16 in gusty condions from 220-240 degrees because it's wider and therefore easier to recover from a gust below 50 feet, whereas on 10/28 that requires a go-around
Also from speaking to pilots based in Dublin, most think widening 10/28 is more of an issue for them. They say they prefer 16 in gusty condions from 220-240 degrees because it's wider and therefore easier to recover from a gust below 50 feet, whereas on 10/28 that requires a go-around
Last edited by Una Due Tfc; 20th Aug 2015 at 17:46.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dublin
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When speaking to some of my colleagues in DUB last year they said they and the DAA were going to try ammend the proposal for 3,600m, whether that's still the position I'm not sure, but they believed there was scope to do this in the existing planning permission granted?
There will definitely be a new application to over turn usage or runways between 23.00-07.00. Can't remember exact limits but the even runway could not be used between 6.00-7.00 and movements between 23.00-07.00 were restricted to either current levels or not much more.
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EY
in various postings by EY they have said the reduction is because they will be down 4 aircraft between between Jan/June until 2 class Dreamliner's arrive for the route and 777 was used to minimize capacity reduction.
All four A340 leaving by end of year and there A350 replacment not arriving until 2017. They will receive a few 787 before June though.
All four A340 leaving by end of year and there A350 replacment not arriving until 2017. They will receive a few 787 before June though.