Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

Bmibaby

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Feb 2011, 10:47
  #961 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Co. Antrim UK
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So if the JAN passenger figures are correct, the WW move to BHD has been a total failure - how long will they stay there and lose money?!!!
gate 22 is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2011, 11:20
  #962 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know how the CWL-BHD figures have been? With BE on their own the route was having increasing loads month on month.
planenut321 is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2011, 13:05
  #963 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where ever they send me
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gate 22, that's a bit of a sweeping statement. What exactly are you basing your conclusion of total failure on?
bmi expat is offline  
Old 25th Feb 2011, 13:12
  #964 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Co. Antrim UK
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gate 22, that's a bit of a sweeping statement. What exactly are you basing your conclusion of total failure on?
I take it back. The figures for BHD give the correct total overall for the month, which I thought would be right. The problem is that the figures shown on the domestic route stats didn't include the WW figures. So 'total failure' was based on inaccurate analysis by me.
gate 22 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2011, 20:13
  #965 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry have I missed something or is there some rumour that baby are setting up base at Stansted?
pamann is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2011, 20:18
  #966 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Pamann..

Baby are opening a route from Belfast to Stansted with a Belfast-based aircraft at the end of March.
When it fails, as I expect it will, they will drop it. I don't think Baby would set up a base at STN, they are none too good against strong competition, and at STN they are up against the strongest (FR & EZY).
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2011, 20:26
  #967 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGS6753

Erm... I know they are starting up shop on the BHD-STN route that is not however what I asked.

There is however a lot of talk about STN in this thread so was asking the question as per my previous post.

You obviously speak (or type) with a tone that disagrees with baby @ STN but that is not what I am asking thank you.
pamann is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2011, 20:28
  #968 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North, UK
Age: 67
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe the only talk of a Stansted base is on here, and is merely speculative
pwalhx is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2011, 20:29
  #969 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 35,000ft
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you pwalhx.
pamann is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2011, 06:40
  #970 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGS6753

less of the negativity . . . . it will not be dropped . . . . forward bookings very strong. do you want to see success on this baby route?
sealink is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2011, 15:02
  #971 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anybody know when bmibaby will release their schedules for Birmingham for November onwards?

I`m one of those super organised people who likes to book WELL in advance - I`m going to go to the MTV Europe Music Awards in Belfast !!
ib26uk is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 06:05
  #972 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle NI
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they went very early last year? mid March rings a bell, but talk of bigger thrust ratings suggest new winter routes so it may delay it, most loco have their winter program on sale by mid late April to early May

Travelling from BHX to BHD is unlikely to change in terms of times and BE will still be on the route
Facelookbovvered is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 07:54
  #973 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: STN BHX EMA
Age: 42
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bhd - Stn Ww

Maybe it's just me but if I was a route analyst or network planner this route would possibly be the furthest thing from my mind, don't see a necessity for it personally and without any bias either way my money would be on six months max for operation.
BOAC4ME is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 19:53
  #974 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: dublin
Age: 56
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah its a kinda curve ball route alright.
dublindispatch is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 20:42
  #975 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: belfast
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well FR seemed to do OK on it so why not Baby?
ALLMCC is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 21:16
  #976 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well FR seemed to do OK on it so why not Baby?
Cost base for one. Also Ryanair have a consistently profitable and ruthless business plan. BMI Baby have the "airliners.net pateneted magic dartboard of route planning".
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 22:40
  #977 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Denmark
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FR did so well on it that they no longer operate the route. FR have fuel efficient aircraft.
Copenhagen is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2011, 22:54
  #978 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: STN BHX EMA
Age: 42
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FR vs WW

As much as FR never have been and never will be my cup of tea, ethos wise, they unquestionably do LC better than most, and therefore have the nous to make pretty much anything work. Baby on the other hand, well, the complete reverse in true of them in my mind, I actually like many aspects of the Airline, however they don't seem to make too many things work well, unfortunately for them I would fear that Lufthansa somewhat agree.
BOAC4ME is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2011, 10:53
  #979 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A lot of nonsense and unfounded speculation in this discussion!
However one supposed fact about the Ryanair vs bmibaby Belfast saga is that Ryanair pulled out of Belfast in a typical toys out of the pram dispute with the airport over the proposed runway extension. Not because they weren't making money on the route - which would indicate there's no reason why the route can't be profitable for bmibaby.

That is of course if that was the real reason and not an excuse to get out without losing face. BAA airport fees are good for that....
ravfooty is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2011, 11:47
  #980 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle NI
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well everyone at BHD and WW seem to be happy with the change of airport with pax numbers up significantly on both BHX & EMA.

STN is an all new ball game, WW are more or less unknown at STN and will not be the first people think of in that part of the country when wishing to fly to NI, i would expect early sales to be stronger outbound from NI in a morning and the reverse in an afternoon.

I don't think it will be price sensitive in FR terms so if they can get the volume up to mid 80+ i suspect they will be happy.

Not sure where BOAC4ME is coming from, one is a very profitable low service airline with 300 aircraft all over Europe (many parked) the other is probably break even at best low service airline with 12 aircraft + 2 summer aircraft.

It seems to be common currency that bmi proper is still burning cash, so if WW is more or less break even then its probably good for forward cash flow and paying a share of Toad Hall.

The move to BHD probably required bmi (WW) to comimit an aircraft to STN as part of the deal to bring pax numbers back up following FR going walkies, if so then i expect the airport charges to WW will be very low for the first 6-12 months, but i have to agree STN was not obvious move for WW in terms of route planning, sometime you have to run a route at a loss! part of the big picture? if any one knows what it is please tell
Facelookbovvered is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.