Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BMI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Feb 2008, 19:25
  #101 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Halfwayback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes they are being damp leased with Astraeus pilots and bmi cabin crew - BUT assuming dicussions with the Union are satisfactory- some bmi mainline pilots will also carry out a 757 conversion to fly tha aircraft as well!

HWB
Halfwayback is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2008, 20:49
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Far flung shores
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Heffer - just to clarify it, what AEU's Part A actually says is:
3000 hours as Operating Flight Crew of which 2500 hours must be as operating crew on an aircraft over 12.5 tonnes*

* may be varied at the discretion of the Director of Flight Operations
Which I think you'll find relates to the DirFltOps being able to vary the requirements wrt to the total hours required for command upgrade, i.e. in respect of those pilots whom have relevant & significant operational experiece, albeit gained flying light jets, e.g. such as corporate business jets.
Puritan is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 07:42
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: taking up the hold
Age: 53
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3000 hours as Operating Flight Crew of which 2500 hours must be as operating crew on an aircraft over 12.5 tonnes
bmi command requirements are in excess of that (4000 hours) & infact all SFOs who are nearing promotion have more like 6000 hours on B737 &/or A320.
Tail-take-off is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 11:38
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget that most of these SFOs have a shed load of longhaul experience on the A330 as well.
Nubboy is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 15:02
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Far flung shores
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Tail-take-off - that figure refers to the 'minimum' requirement... and aside from which, simply having lots of hours in the RHS does not mean that one is going to pass the command assessment sim ride, and / or the subsequent command course.
Puritan is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 21:07
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: london
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Astraeus will not disadvantage any of it's own pilots and are not required to by the contract in place. This means that any AEU pilot wishing to bid for LHR will be given preference, including those only rated on the B737. As the AEU B737 fleet is due to reduce I expect that there will be many UK based pilots interested in the LHR base.

The other thing to note here is that AEU have been operating 5 B757s for some time, so one would imagine that the aircraft are already crewed up. The bmi operation does not require AEU to add to it's B757 fleet.

Whilst the company has been through some extreme change, the investment from their backers and the new contracts in place surely mean that those who are there (having seen it through the difficult times) will stay.

Also, I understand there are a handful of AEU F/Os up for command on the B757.

If AEU had to go into the market place for pilots to crew the bmi operation, then it would make sense to use anything bmi could offer; captains and F/Os.

I know for a fact that there are AEU B757 pilots who would be better placed with a commute to LHR rather than LGW.

Good luck to the management on both sides in sorting this one.
standbyils is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2008, 22:23
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Far flung shores
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wrt
If AEU had to go into the market place for pilots to crew the bmi operation, then it would make sense to use anything bmi could offer; captains and F/Os.
Uhm, therein the really interesting bit would be how to handle the undoubted disparity between BMI's & AEU's pay scales & T&C's?!

One can certainly envisage a situation where there are two pilots (1 BMI and 1 AEU), of the same rank, flying in the exact same aircraft, on the same route, but being paid different rates / allowances... and that's really going to go down like a lead balloon, isn't it ?!
Puritan is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 20:02
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Dublin
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based on the way Astraeus have operated in the past, surely they will go to the agencies and get typed pilots on short term contracts? Having said that, there may well be no holes to plug! WRT guys operating on vastly different pay scales..is this the right message to send to the loyal AEU crews whom have stayed through the restructure? Having said that I understand most of the FO's on the 757 and 737 fleet have significant time and presumably the bosses will want to protect thier assets.
Puritan summed it up..this won't be an upgrade passport but may be a chance to put another useful type on the ticket..Best of luck to both the red corner and the blue corner!
Kirks gusset is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2008, 12:57
  #109 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Halfwayback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has happened in the past (albeit where bmi was the lessor) that other pilots have undergone a type conversion and then flown as operating crew. The fact that there was a totally different pay structure in place in the two different airlines was immaterial.

A Newsflash issued this morning by BALPA and bmi states that good progress has been made and there will be a positive benefit for the bmi pilot workforce. It goes on to say that there needs to be further discussions with Astraeus before a further details communication will be issued. We need to see what that contains before prejudging the case.

HWB
Halfwayback is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2008, 20:46
  #110 (permalink)  
fade to grey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hmmm,
could make for some interesting CRM moments, I hope it all works out.... I have a vested interest.
 
Old 5th Mar 2008, 14:11
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it true that Bmi aim to introduce centralized load planning and will only require Dispatchers not Load Controllers?

Cheers
mathers_wales_uk is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2008, 19:03
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wherever my current employers wish to send me !!
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, we tried that one back in the late 90's.....
I'd be surprised and disappointed if it made a comeback !
Little Blue is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2008, 19:19
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that, i was just wondering becuase they were testing it out on the WW2901/WW2902 last weekend at Cardiff. I know it is a BmiBaby flight and it would have some cost savings in the long run as you would pay the handling agents less for Dispatch compared to load control.

One major problem is that unless standard loading is used (as currently), then it may cause more problems and delays than what it's worth. I have much more control of a flight if i prepare the loadsheet than trusting somone from Castle Donnington. Any errors would take longer to rectify awaiting for a new loadsheed (not the best for a 25 min turnaround).
mathers_wales_uk is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2008, 19:37
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,195
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
than trusting somone from Castle Donnington
IIRC The last time it was all done from a trading estate somewhere outside Edinburgh. Cannot see why it would work any better this time, unless there is an investment in mobile datacomms.

YS

Sorry, bmi and invest? Silly idea!
Yellow Sun is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2008, 19:52
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: taking up the hold
Age: 53
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Puritan
that figure refers to the 'minimum' requirement... and aside from which, simply having lots of hours in the RHS does not mean that one is going to pass the command assessment sim ride, and / or the subsequent command course.
Exactly the same at bmi but the basic hours requirement is higher. If Ashtrays'R'us weren't doing these routes for us these very same FOs would be doing them in the LHS of a 321. Those in the frame have already passed bmi command assessments & I doubt the required standard is much different.
Tail-take-off is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 00:20
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: GB
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mathers_wales_uk
than trusting somone from Castle Donington
pilots will be doing the loadsheets themselves on the new laptops. had a look at the system the other day and its quite impressive although i forgot to ask about a "hard copy" (they just take figures from the screen), but would assume its sent somewhere to be printed.
pavil is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 00:34
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what is required then is for the captain to receive the weights, distribution of bags etc. Then he is to tell the dispatcher where to load the bags etc. and then they complete the loadsheet on their laptops?



Cheers
mathers_wales_uk is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 01:05
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: GB
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not wanting to steer this thread into a dispatch discussion but, and i could be wrong, im pretty sure the captain said "tell us how its loaded" so i would assume that to save time theyll be trusting stations to load how they see fit. sorry for being a bit vague but i didnt really have time to discuss it with him in great detail.
pavil is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 02:29
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have seen a briefing on a similar automated loadsheet system that my company was looking at. Probably most systems are the same but the one that I saw resulted in the crew member inputting the various load information. Obviously the Captain can't 'sign' an e-loadsheet so the crew member is given a User ID and a Password and this is used to verify who accepted the loadsheet! A copy is then e-mailed from the PDA/Laptop to Ops where it is stored and archived in accordance with the regulations.

A good system!
Mister Geezer is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2008, 07:06
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: gate 67 JFK
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A laptop on a boeing!!

What ever next? APU's that do what it says on the can
INKJET is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.